{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]],"date-time":"2026-01-27T07:26:31Z","timestamp":1769498791110,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,3]],"date-time":"2011-04-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1301788800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To record and compare obstetric and neonatal complication rates in women with reversed and non\u2010reversed type III female genital mutilation (FGM).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective observational study comparing cesarean delivery rates and neonatal outcomes of primiparous and multiparous women who had or had not undergone reversal of FGM III.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Of the 250 women, 230 (92%) had an FGM reversal. Of these, 50 (21.7%) were primiparous (cesarean delivery rate 17\/50; 34%) and 180 (78.3%) were multiparous (cesarean delivery rate 28\/180; 15.6%). Of the 20 women who had not had an FGM reversal, 7 (35%) were primiparous (cesarean delivery rate 5\/7; 71.4%) and 13 (65%) were multiparous (cesarean delivery rate 7\/13; 53.8%). The cesarean delivery rates for primiparae and multiparae were 32.9% and 25%, respectively. Multiparous women with FGM III reversal had a lower possibility of cesarean delivery compared with the hospital multiparous population (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.003) and multiparae who had not undergone FGM III reversal (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.007). There was no significant association between Apgar scores or blood loss at vaginal delivery and FGM reversal.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Reversal of FGM III significantly reduced the increased risk of cesarean delivery seen with multiparae who have FGM III.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.10.028","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,9]],"date-time":"2011-02-09T09:32:57Z","timestamp":1297243977000},"page":"141-143","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women with reversed and non\u2010reversed type III female genital mutilation"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"113","author":[{"given":"Sanaria A.","family":"Raouf","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Teresa","family":"Ball","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alison","family":"Hughes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roger","family":"Holder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Spyros","family":"Papaioannou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","unstructured":"OHCHRUNAIDSUNDPUNECAUNESCOUNFPAUNHCRUNICEFUNIFEMWHO.Eliminating Female genital mutilation: An interagency statementwww.who.inthttp:\/\/whqlibdoc.who.int\/publications\/2008\/9789241596442_eng.pdf Published 2008"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","unstructured":"The Department of Health.CMO's Update 37www.dh.gov.ukhttp:\/\/www.dh.gov.uk\/prod_consum_dh\/groups\/dh_digitalassets\/@dh\/@en\/documents\/digitalasset\/dh_4070176.pdf Published 2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Female genital mutilation and its managementwww.rcog.org.ukhttp:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/files\/rcog\u2010corp\/GreenTop53FemaleGenitalMutilation.pdf Published 2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68805-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11676.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2001.00036.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2000.079009737.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10843.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180701780957"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02215.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00313-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","unstructured":"Foundation For Women's Health Research and DevelopmentDepartment of HealthLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Midwifery City University.A Statistical Study to Estimate the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation in England and Waleshttp:\/\/www.FORWARDuk.org.uk\/download\/96 Accessed 14 December 2010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","unstructured":"United Nations Population Fund.Statement on the International Day Against Female Genital Mutilationwww.unfpa.orghttp:\/\/www.unfpa.org\/public\/News\/pid\/280 Published 2007"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729211000154?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729211000154?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2010.10.028","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2010.10.028","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.10.028","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,6]],"date-time":"2023-10-06T11:50:34Z","timestamp":1696593034000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.10.028"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,3]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.10.028"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.10.028","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,3]]}}}