{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,11]],"date-time":"2026-06-11T01:06:53Z","timestamp":1781140013692,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,5]],"date-time":"2012-10-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1349395200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare complication rates and short\u2010term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among obese and non\u2010obese women.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective multicenter study of 39 obese women and 111 non\u2010obese women was conducted. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) above 30. Operative parameters (length of operation, associated procedures, complication rate, and length of hospitalization) and short\u2010term (2 months) objective and subjective results were evaluated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The median BMI in the obese group was 30.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 30\u201332) versus 23 (IQR 21\u201325) in the non\u2010obese group (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). Short\u2010term anatomic results (postoperative stage of prolapse) were comparable in the obese and non\u2010obese groups: stage 0\u20131, 87.1% versus 91.6% (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.60); stage 2, 10.2% versus 5.5% (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.60); stage 3\u20134, 2.5% versus 2.5% (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.60). Complication rates were also similar in the obese and non\u2010obese groups: bladder injury, 2.5% versus 5.4% (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.77); laparoconversion, 5.1% versus 4.5% (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.77). Rates of reoperation (excluding women with de novo urinary stress incontinence) were 12.8% in the obese group and 8.1% in the non\u2010obese group (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.58).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has similar complication rates and short\u2010term outcomes among both obese and non\u2010obese women.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.07.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,6]],"date-time":"2012-10-06T00:00:26Z","timestamp":1349481626000},"page":"49-52","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"title":["Outcomes and feasibility of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among obese versus non\u2010obese women"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"120","author":[{"given":"Thibault","family":"Thubert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alix","family":"Naveau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arnaud","family":"Letohic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincent","family":"Villefranque","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jean Louis","family":"Benifla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xavier","family":"Deffieux","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199910073411501"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02327.x"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00367.x","article-title":"Factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction with emphasis on urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse: an epidemiological study","volume":"83","author":"Uustal Fornell E.","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0765-x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.01.016"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.10.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.030"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35133-7","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy related to body mass index","volume":"34","author":"McDermott C.D.","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Can"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1324-9","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) \/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery","volume":"22","author":"Haylen B.T.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.07.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000187299.75024.c4"},{"issue":"7","key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1995.03530070057030","article-title":"Community\u2010based prevalence of anal incontinence","volume":"274","author":"Nelson R.","year":"1995","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-5415.2005.53211.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.50.4.480"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000161367.65261.16"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/CEJ.0b013e32834761c0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000136100.10818.d8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123819"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1687-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00829-9"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729212004997?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729212004997?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2012.07.020","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2012.07.020","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.07.020","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,6]],"date-time":"2023-10-06T02:38:34Z","timestamp":1696559914000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.07.020"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,5]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.07.020"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.07.020","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,5]]}}}