{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,17]],"date-time":"2025-11-17T17:11:52Z","timestamp":1763399512152,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,4]],"date-time":"2013-09-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1378252800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,1]],"date-time":"2015-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1441065600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":727,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ijgo.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To describe the management of third\u2010trimester stillbirth at a single institution, stratifying induction intervals and adverse outcomes by method.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Women diagnosed with fetal demise at 28 weeks or later and admitted to an academic hospital between January 2007 and September 2010 were identified. A chart review extracted demographics, history, induction method, delivery interval, and adverse outcomes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Seventy\u2010four women were included, with a median gestational age of 35.5 weeks (range, 28\u201340 weeks). Ten women had undergone at least 1 prior cesarean. Induction methods included misoprostol alone or for cervical ripening; oxytocin and amniotomy; transcervical Foley catheter; and mifepristone. Overall, 88% of patients delivered within 24 hours; median time to fetal delivery was 11 hours 20 minutes (range, 7 minutes to 57 hours 12 minutes). Adverse outcomes included intrapartum fever and postpartum hemorrhage. In total, 98% of patients, including those with prior cesarean, had a successful vaginal delivery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Regardless of third\u2010trimester induction method for management of stillbirth, the majority of women experience safe delivery within 24 hours. The descriptive data imply that misoprostol\u2010only inductions might confer the shortest induction intervals; however, further prospective trials are needed to identify the optimal misoprostol regimen for women with third\u2010trimester stillbirth.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.06.023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,4]],"date-time":"2013-09-04T01:36:53Z","timestamp":1378258613000},"page":"203-206","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Labor induction outcomes in third\u2010trimester stillbirths"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"123","author":[{"given":"Lori M.","family":"Gawron","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jessica W.","family":"Kiley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"8","key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2005","volume":"57","author":"MacDorman M.F.","year":"2009","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819e9ee2","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: management of stillbirth","volume":"113","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","first-page":"55","article-title":"A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour in women with intra uterine fetal death in Mulago Hospital, Uganda","volume":"1","author":"Nakintu N.","year":"2001","journal-title":"Afr Health Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","first-page":"CD004901","article-title":"Misoprostol for induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second or third trimester for women with a fetal anomaly or after intrauterine fetal death","author":"Dodd J.M.","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","first-page":"70","article-title":"A randomized trial of oral and vaginal misoprostol to manage delivery in cases of fetal death","volume":"101","author":"Chittacharoen A.","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","first-page":"179","article-title":"Comparison of vaginal and oral misoprostol, for the induction of labour in women with intra\u2010uterine foetal death","volume":"81","author":"Nyende L.","year":"2004","journal-title":"East Afr Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.09.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.10.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00338.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.561386"},{"issue":"8","key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","first-page":"897","article-title":"Outcomes of pregnancy termination by misoprostol at 14\u201332 weeks of gestation: a 10\u2010year\u2010experience","volume":"94","author":"Pongsatha S.","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.01.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00224-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(95)02593-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1254548"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08266.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819dbfe2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00285.x"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729213004189?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729213004189?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2013.06.023","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2013.06.023","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.06.023","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,29]],"date-time":"2024-11-29T12:41:24Z","timestamp":1732884084000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.06.023"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,4]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.06.023"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.06.023","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0020-7292"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1879-3479"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Labor induction outcomes in third-trimester stillbirths","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.06.023","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}