{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T08:05:01Z","timestamp":1759565101413,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":4,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,2]],"date-time":"2014-01-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1388620800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,1]],"date-time":"2015-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1441065600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":607,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ijgo.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:label\/><jats:p>While transverse incision is the recommended entry technique for cesarean delivery in high\u2010income countries, it is our experience that midline incision is still used routinely in many low\u2010income settings. Accordingly, international guidelines lack uniformity on this matter. Although evidence is limited, the literature suggests important advantages of the transverse incision, with lower risk of long\u2010term disabilities such as wound disruption and hernia. Also, potential extra time spent on this incision appears not to impact neonatal outcome. Therefore, we suggest that it is time for a change in guidelines for low\u2010income settings in which resources are limited for treating complications that may be life threatening.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.09.030","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,2]],"date-time":"2014-01-02T20:45:28Z","timestamp":1388695528000},"page":"1-2","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Midline versus transverse incision for cesarean delivery in low\u2010income countries"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"125","author":[{"given":"Nanna","family":"Maal\u00f8e","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anna J.M.","family":"Aabakke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Niels J.","family":"Secher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9888","key":"e_1_2_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)60441-9","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial","volume":"382","author":"CORONIS Collaborative Group","year":"2013","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_2","unstructured":"World Health Organization UNFPA UNICEF World Bank.Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth. Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwives and doctors.http:\/\/whqlibdoc.who.int\/publications\/2007\/9241545879_eng.pdf Published 2000. Upadated 2007. Accessed August 23 2013"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03215866"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_2","first-page":"CD005199","article-title":"Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery","volume":"4","author":"Brown S.R.","year":"2005","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729213006759?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729213006759?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2013.09.030","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2013.09.030","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.09.030","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T00:24:39Z","timestamp":1696465479000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.09.030"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,2]]},"references-count":4,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.09.030"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.09.030","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0020-7292"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1879-3479"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Midline versus transverse incision for cesarean delivery in low-income countries","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.09.030","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}