{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,26]],"date-time":"2026-10-26T22:31:14Z","timestamp":1793053874943,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,25]],"date-time":"2015-09-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1443139200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,25]],"date-time":"2015-09-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1443139200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,1]],"date-time":"2015-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1441065600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ijgo.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the association between sonographically measured head circumference (HC) and labor outcome.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>In a retrospective study at a tertiary medical center in Israel, data were reviewed for all term singleton deliveries between July 2007 and December 2012 with HC measurements up to 7 days before delivery. HC was compared between women with operative vaginal delivery (OVD) or cesarean delivery for prolonged second stage and those with normal vaginal delivery. The impact of HC above the 75th percentile on pregnancy outcome was analyzed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The study included 2351 women, of whom 2045 (87.0%) had a normal vaginal delivery, 259 (11.0%) underwent OVD, and 47 (2.0%) cesarean. Each 10 mm increase in HC was associated with increased risk for obstetric intervention because of a prolonged second stage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08\u20131.46). HC above the 75th percentile was independently associated with increased odds of OVD (aOR 1.77; 95% CI 1.30\u20132.41), 1\u2010minute Apgar score less than 7 (aOR 2.91; 95% CI 1.50\u20135.66), and neonatal asphyxia (aOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.02\u20134.71).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Term HC above the 75th percentile was associated with increased rates of obstetric interventions because of a prolonged second stage and might be associated with neonatal asphyxia.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.043","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,26]],"date-time":"2015-09-26T05:47:59Z","timestamp":1443246479000},"page":"72-76","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Association between sonographic measurement of fetal head circumference and labor outcome"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"132","author":[{"given":"Amir","family":"Aviram","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yariv","family":"Yogev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ron","family":"Bardin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liran","family":"Hiersch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arnon","family":"Wiznitzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eran","family":"Hadar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0630-7"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","first-page":"159","article-title":"The influence of birth weight on labor in nulliparas","volume":"76","author":"Turner M.J.","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.11.6.409.413","article-title":"Obstetric risk factors for failure to progress in the first versus the second stage of labor","volume":"11","author":"Sheiner E.","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000010239"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.043"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.308.6933.887"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.789850"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.09.006"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2011-0306","article-title":"Can a customized standard for large for gestational age identify women at risk of operative delivery and shoulder dystocia?","volume":"40","author":"Cha H.H.","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","first-page":"569","article-title":"Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements","volume":"67","author":"Warsof S.L.","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2005.00311.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.03.028"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03486.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01358.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/0144361031000153701"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-106"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-012-1013-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.138.4.649"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870100803"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7760"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_2","volume-title":"Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology","author":"Callen P.W.","year":"2008"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_6_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1319","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200611000-00058","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 348, November 2006: Umbilical cord blood gas and acid\u2013base analysis","volume":"108","author":"ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729215005925?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729215005925?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2015.06.043","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2015.06.043","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.043","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,3]],"date-time":"2023-10-03T22:47:52Z","timestamp":1696373272000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.043"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,25]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.043"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.043","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Association between sonographic measurement of fetal head circumference and labor outcome","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.043","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}