{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T18:44:17Z","timestamp":1791398657820,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,31]],"date-time":"2012-10-31T11:31:12Z","timestamp":1351683072000},"page":"31-35","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["Choice of anaesthetic agents for caesarean section: A UK survey of current practice"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"H.","family":"Murdoch","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Scrutton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.H.","family":"Laxton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/S0959-289X(03)00045-1","article-title":"Propofol should be the induction agent of choice for caesarean section under general anaesthesia","volume":"12","author":"Duggal","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0010","unstructured":"The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers\u2019 Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2003\u20132005. The Seventh Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saving Mothers\u2019 Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006\u201308. The Eighth Report on the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011;118(Suppl 1):1\u2013203.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1090","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.2001.01962.x","article-title":"Rapid sequence induction: a national survey of practice","volume":"56","author":"Morris","year":"2001","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2008.05681.x","article-title":"Variation in rapid sequence induction techniques: current practice in Wales","volume":"64","author":"Koerber","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1999.00738.x","article-title":"Rapid sequence induction: a questionnaire survey of its routine conduct and continued management during a failed intubation","volume":"54","author":"Twaites","year":"1999","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2006.04.008","article-title":"Traditional rapid sequence induction is an outmoded technique for caesarean section and should be modified","volume":"15","author":"Levy","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0b013e3283294c4a","article-title":"RSI in obstetrics revisited","volume":"22","author":"Sharp","year":"2009","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2008.01.016","article-title":"A prospective study of awareness and recall associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean section","volume":"17","author":"Paech","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/31.4.152","article-title":"General anaesthesia for operative obstetrics","volume":"31","author":"Hamer Hodges","year":"1959","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09321.x","article-title":"Awareness during caesarean section","volume":"46","author":"Lyons","year":"1991","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"9423","key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0060","first-page":"363","article-title":"Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-aware randomised controlled trial","volume":"29","author":"Myles","year":"2004","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2010.06312.x","article-title":"Litigation in obstetric general anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995\u20132007","volume":"65","author":"Ashpole","year":"2010","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/62.6.649","article-title":"Neurobehavioural effects of propofol on the neonate following elective caesarean section","volume":"62","author":"Celleno","year":"1989","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/0959-289X(91)90025-L","article-title":"Propofol and thiopentone for caesarean section revisited: maternal effects and neonatal outcome","volume":"1","author":"Capogna","year":"1991","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/70.3.311","article-title":"Plasma catcholamines and neonatal condition after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone at caesarean section","volume":"70","author":"Gin","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09264.x","article-title":"Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia for elective caesarean section","volume":"44","author":"Valtonen","year":"1989","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-198912000-00003","article-title":"Intravenous propofol during caesarean section: placental transfer, concentrations in breast milk, and neonatal effects: a preliminary study","volume":"71","author":"Dailland","year":"1989","journal-title":"Anaesthesiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0095","first-page":"S121","article-title":"A comparison of the residual effects of thiopental and propofol on newborn nutritive sucking behaviour","volume":"74","author":"Gratz","year":"1992","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09263.x","article-title":"A comparison between propofol and thiopentone as induction agents for obstetric anaesthesia","volume":"44","author":"Moore","year":"1989","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04044.x","article-title":"Intravenous propofol vs. thiamylal-isoflurane for caesarean section, comparative maternal and neonatal effects","volume":"39","author":"Abboud","year":"1995","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/72.5.596","article-title":"Haemodynamic and catecholamine changes after induction of anaesthesia with either thiopentone or propofol with suxamethonium","volume":"72","author":"Brossy","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03037030","article-title":"Intubating conditions and haemodynamic changes following thiopentone or propofol for early tracheal intubation","volume":"40","author":"Wilmot","year":"1993","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0120","unstructured":"Summary of product characteristics for thiopental sodium. http:\/\/www.medicines.org.uk\/emc\/history\/14338\/SPC [accessed March 2012]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0125","unstructured":"Intravenous anaesthetics in British National Formulary, 62nd ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2011. p. 793. http:\/\/www.bnf.org\/bnf\/index.htm [accessed March 2012]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/S0959-289X(99)80149-6","article-title":"Administration of drugs outside of product licence: awareness and current practice","volume":"8","author":"Howell","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200601000-00004","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal effects of remifentanil at induction of general anaesthesia for cesarean delivery","volume":"104","author":"Ngan Kee","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0140","first-page":"E57","article-title":"General anesthesia for c-section should include an opioid prior to delivery of the fetus? Pro-Con discussion","volume":"36","author":"Ortiz-Gomez","year":"2011","journal-title":"Reg Anesth Pain Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04159.x","article-title":"Desflurane: a new volatile anesthetic for cesarean section","volume":"39","author":"Abboud","year":"1995","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0185","series-title":"Anaesthesia for cesarean delivery in Chestnut\u2019s obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice","author":"Tsen","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2004.01.005","article-title":"General anaesthesia with target controlled infusion of propofol for planned caesarean section: maternal and neonatal effects of a remifentanil based technique","volume":"13","author":"Van de Velde","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f","article-title":"The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial","volume":"104","author":"McDonnell","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aep235","article-title":"Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after caesarean delivery","volume":"103","author":"Belavy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2004.10.003","article-title":"The demise of general anesthesia in obstetrics revisited: a prescription for a cure","volume":"14","author":"Lipman","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2009.01.013","article-title":"The preparation and storage of anaesthetic drugs for obstetric emergencies: a survey of UK practice","volume":"18","author":"Stone","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.06.004","article-title":"Prefilled thiopental syringes reduce drug costs and wastage whilst improving safety","volume":"21","author":"Murdoch","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anaesth"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0959289X12001227?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0959289X12001227?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,19]],"date-time":"2018-11-19T18:25:03Z","timestamp":1542651903000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0959289X12001227"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0959289X12001227"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["0959-289X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0959-289X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Choice of anaesthetic agents for caesarean section: A UK survey of current practice","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.09.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}