{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T03:47:55Z","timestamp":1792813675889,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"C","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,9]],"date-time":"2020-06-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1591660800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":160,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Colon perforation caused by the intrauterine device (IUD) migration is rare, but severe complication that can occur years after the insertion. Depending on the location of the injured intestine, the different methods for extracting migrated IUD raging from colonoscopy to laparotomy can be chosen.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Case presentation<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A 41-year-old female presented with the discomfort in the epigastric area went to the outpatient clinic. A doctor performed gastroscopy and found a polyp. During a colonoscopy, we found a small solid object protruding through the intestinal wall. CT scan showed IUD like \u201cT\u201d shape foreign body, which longest part was protruding a wall of the colon. After these CT findings, the patient informed us that she had IUD inserted almost ten years ago. We found the device with the laparoscopic approach. IUD was removed and the intestinal damage was repaired during the mini-laparotomy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Perforation of IUD can be asymptomatic, although sometimes it can cause short-term or long-term symptoms. Penetrated IUDs should be removed whenever identified. For intra-abdominal penetrations, the laparoscopic or mini-laparotomy approach is a safe and appropriate method.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Highlights<\/jats:title>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijscr.2020.06.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,12]],"date-time":"2020-06-12T11:54:09Z","timestamp":1591962849000},"page":"306-308","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Intrauterine device migration into the lumen of large bowel"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"72","author":[{"given":"Vygintas","family":"Aliukonis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marius","family":"Lasinskas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Algirdas","family":"Pilvelis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Audrius","family":"Gradauskas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1525","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1201695","article-title":"A means to prevent conception","volume":"35","author":"Richter","year":"1909","journal-title":"Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr"},{"key":"R2-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12130","article-title":"Women\u2019s willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device","volume":"137","author":"Melo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet"},{"key":"R3-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0716-2","article-title":"Colonpenetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report withliterature review","volume":"279","author":"Arslan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet"},{"key":"R4-67-20260114","first-page":"97","article-title":"The perforated intrauterine device: endoscopic retrieval","volume":"12","author":"Heinberg","year":"2008","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"R5-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0882-2","article-title":"Ovarian embedding of a transmigrated intrauterine device: a case report and literature review","volume":"280","author":"Verma","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet"},{"key":"R6-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2005.02.003","article-title":"Sigmoid penetration by an intrauterine device","volume":"12","author":"Baakdah","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R7-67-20260114","first-page":"182","article-title":"Canadian contraception consensus (part 3 of 4): Chapter 7 e intrauterine contraception","volume":"2016","author":"Black","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Can"},{"key":"R9-67-20260114","first-page":"195","article-title":"Lost intrauterine devices and their localization","volume":"20","author":"Rao","year":"1978","journal-title":"J. Reprod. Med"},{"key":"R10-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.003","article-title":"Minimally invasive approach to cases of lost intra-uterine device: a 7-year experience","volume":"159","author":"Cetinkaya","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol"},{"key":"R11-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e127","DOI":"10.7205\/MILMED-D-13-00268","article-title":"Sigmoid colon penetration by an intrauterine device: a case report and literature review","volume":"179","author":"Takahashi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Mil. Med"},{"key":"R12-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-198108000-00001","article-title":"Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management","volume":"36","author":"Zakin","year":"1981","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol. Surv"},{"key":"R14-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180801892868","article-title":"Incidental finding of an intrauterine device in the sigmoid colon","volume":"13","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care"},{"key":"R15-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.07.025","article-title":"Surgical removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine devices at one center in a 20-year period","volume":"128","author":"Ertopcu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet"},{"key":"R16-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.322115068","article-title":"Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care","volume":"32","author":"Boortz","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"R17-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.037","article-title":"Endoscopic treatment of a transmigrated intrauterine device to colonic wall: a case report","volume":"204","author":"Gonenc","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e00090","DOI":"10.14309\/crj.0000000000000090","article-title":"Endoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device: case report and review of literature and technique","volume":"6","author":"Lei","year":"2019","journal-title":"ACG Case Rep. J"},{"key":"R19-67-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.04.015","article-title":"Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review","volume":"85","author":"Gill","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Surgery Case Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S221026122030403X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S221026122030403X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2020.06.011","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,14]],"date-time":"2026-01-14T13:05:30Z","timestamp":1768395930000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2020.06.011"}},"subtitle":["A case report"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"C","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2020.06.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["2210-2612"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2210-2612","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]}}}