{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,15]],"date-time":"2026-01-15T00:00:11Z","timestamp":1768435211766,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"D","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]],"date-time":"2020-08-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598572800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":240,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To report a case of uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Presentation of case<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The patient is a 42-year old Caucasian woman with pelvic organ prolapse. She previously had undergone a pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal surgical approach, she had suffered from anorexia nervosa and she had two childbirths with vaginal deliveries. The woman was treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and retropubic colposuspension.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Data suggest that abdominal surgery, typically with an abdominal sacralcolpopexy, provides better objective anatomic outcomes, than vaginal procedures, despite the longer operating times and grater delay in the resumption of activities which can be mitigated by the use of laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Several studies about vaginal approaches suggest that uterus-preserving surgery with vaginal procedures have similar success rates, less blood loss and shorter surgical time compared with hysterectomy. A multicenter study compared laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal mesh hysteropexy reported similar one-year cure rates, improvement in pelvic floor symptoms, improvement in sexual function, and satisfaction rates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We found robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy to be a feasible and successful procedure. Combining robotic retropubic colposuspension to sacrohysteropexy is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Further studies are needed to define the standard surgical steps and confirm the efficacy and the advantages of this procedure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Highlights<\/jats:title>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijscr.2020.08.055","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,4]],"date-time":"2020-09-04T07:47:51Z","timestamp":1599205671000},"page":"S143-S146","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"77","author":[{"given":"Gaspare","family":"Cucinella","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Silvia","family":"Culmone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ettore","family":"Guastella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Francesco","family":"Gentile","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Francesca","family":"De Maria","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roberto","family":"Gran\u00e0","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bruno","family":"Carlisi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stefano","family":"Rotolo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gloria","family":"Calagna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.300.11.1311","article-title":"Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women","volume":"300","author":"Nygaard","year":"2008","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R2-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","article-title":"Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"24","author":"Barber","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J"},{"key":"R3-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","article-title":"Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"209","author":"Korbly","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R4-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c","article-title":"Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Paraiso","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R5-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2018.10.028","article-title":"The SCARE 2018 Statement: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines","volume":"60","author":"Agha","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int. J. Surg"},{"key":"R6-37-20260114","first-page":"75","article-title":"Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging","volume":"4","author":"Persu","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Med. Life"},{"key":"R7-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73729","article-title":"Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"116","author":"Smith","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R8-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000570","article-title":"Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"125","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R9-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2031","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.24115","article-title":"Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature","volume":"38","author":"Szymczak","year":"2019","journal-title":"Neurourol. Urodyn"},{"key":"R10-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1752","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.11.051","article-title":"Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study","volume":"192","author":"Paraiso","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-37-20260114","first-page":"113","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study","volume":"37","author":"Cucinella","year":"2016","journal-title":"G Chir"},{"key":"R12-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.035","article-title":"Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"213","author":"Ridgeway","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R13-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","article-title":"Uterine-preserving POP surgery","volume":"24","author":"Gutman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J"},{"key":"R14-37-20260114","first-page":"143","article-title":"Uterine preservation in the surgical management of genuine stress urinary incontinence associated with uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"168","author":"Nesbitt","year":"1989","journal-title":"Surg. Gynecol. Obstet"},{"key":"R15-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00665-3","article-title":"Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: long-term follow-up","volume":"189","author":"Barranger","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R16-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1631-9","article-title":"Sacrohysteropexy followed by successful pregnancy and eventual reoperation for prolapse","volume":"23","author":"Lewis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J"},{"key":"R17-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818ce394","article-title":"Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy","volume":"112","author":"Geller","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1097\/igc.0000000000001130","article-title":"The patient and observer scar assessment scale to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of the robotic single-site hysterectomy in endometrial cancer","volume":"28","author":"Corrado","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer"},{"key":"R19-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1159\/000371726","article-title":"Outcomes and postoperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterosacropexy: initial experience","volume":"95","author":"Cerruto","year":"2015","journal-title":"Urol. Int"},{"key":"R20-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2869-4","article-title":"Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"27","author":"Paek","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J"},{"key":"R21-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ucl.2012.06.008","article-title":"Robotic\/laparoscopic prolapse repair: role of hysteropexy: a urogynecology perspective","volume":"39","author":"Ramm","year":"2012","journal-title":"Urol. Clin. North Am"},{"key":"R22-37-20260114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.447","article-title":"Robotic sacral hysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"8","author":"Vitobello","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. J. Med. Robot"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Surgery Case Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2210261220306556?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2210261220306556?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2020.08.055","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,14]],"date-time":"2026-01-14T13:36:03Z","timestamp":1768397763000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2020.08.055"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"D","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2020.08.055","relation":{},"ISSN":["2210-2612"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2210-2612","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]}}}