{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,23]],"date-time":"2026-04-23T21:42:28Z","timestamp":1776980548328,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"C","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,2]],"date-time":"2024-11-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730505600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction and importance:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The intrauterine device, usually in the form of a copper IUD or levonorgestrel intrauterine system, is a widely used contraceptive method. The risk of uterine perforation is low and ranges from 0.3 to 2.2 per 1000 insertions for Cu-IUD. The bladder, with 24 %, is, after the bowel, the second most common location among all intra-abdominal locations of the migrated IUDs, which can cause development of a bladder stone.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Case presentation:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We present a case of a 32-year-old woman who attends with increasing dysuria. She reported using an IUD before her last pregnancy. Abdominal sonography and computed tomography revealed a lost IUD migrated into the bladder with stone formation. An open abdominal cystotomy was carried out in order to remove the IUD. Patient reported improvement of the symptoms postoperatively.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical discussion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In the case of transvesical migration of IUD, lower urinary tract symptoms can occur and vesicolithiasis can develop. If the IUD is completely inside the bladder or if it gets small stones inside it, the device and stones may need to be removed through a cystoscopic or suprapubic approach. When large stones have formed or when the IUD has partially penetrated the bladder wall, open surgery has been the method of choice for removal.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In case of migrated IUD, a vaginal and abdominal ultrasound, X-rays, and computed tomography are useful tools for detecting dislocated IUDs. For the treatment physicians can choose a cystoscopic, laparoscopic, or abdominal approach based on the symptoms, the size of the stones, the IUD's location on the bladder wall, and their experience in laparoscopy and open surgery. If patients report dysuria after inserting of IUD a migrated IUD into the bladder should be taken into account.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Highlights<\/jats:title>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijscr.2024.110562","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,7]],"date-time":"2024-11-07T12:17:31Z","timestamp":1730981851000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Case report: Bladder stone caused by dislocated Cu-IUD"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"125","author":[{"given":"Elvin","family":"Piriyev","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ahdab","family":"Ali Azim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital \u201cYeni Klinika\u201d Baku, Azerbaijan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gamzat","family":"Jigarov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital \u201cYeni Klinika\u201d Baku, Azerbaijan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Azad","family":"Suleymanov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital \u201cYeni Klinika\u201d Baku, Azerbaijan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emil","family":"Mukhtarov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital \u201cYeni Klinika\u201d Baku, Azerbaijan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"R\u00f6mer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"R1-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.021","article-title":"Contraceptive failure in the United States","volume":"83","author":"Trussell,","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5S","key":"R2-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2019.07.001","article-title":"Intrauterine devices: effective contraception with noncontraceptive benefits for adolescents","volume":"32","author":"Adeyemi-Fowode,","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol."},{"issue":"5","key":"R3-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.001","article-title":"Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the contraceptive CHOICE project","volume":"84","author":"Mestad,","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R4-84-20260423","first-page":"172","article-title":"Case report: pregnancy while using an IUD","volume":"7","author":"Piriyev,","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol. Cases Rev."},{"issue":"4","key":"R5-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.01.007","article-title":"Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European active surveillance study on intrauterine devices","volume":"91","author":"Heinemann,","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"R6-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.12.123","article-title":"Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management and clinical outcomes HHS public access","volume":"21","author":"Kho,","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"issue":"15","key":"R7-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.2147\/OAJC.S458156","article-title":"Migration of intra-uterine devices","volume":"12","author":"Verstraeten,","year":"2024","journal-title":"Open Access J. Contracept."},{"issue":"1","key":"R8-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1186\/s40834-020-00129-2","article-title":"Removal of a missing intrauterine contraceptive device after location through an ultrasound: a case report within a rural setting and review of literature","volume":"7;5","author":"Argaw,","year":"2020","journal-title":"Contracept Reprod. Med."},{"issue":"5","key":"R9-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004967","article-title":"Long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"140","author":"Baker,","year":"2022","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"5","key":"R10-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1136","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000000373","article-title":"The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines","volume":"109","author":"Sohrabi,","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int. J. Surg. Lond. Engl."},{"key":"R11-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(17)37159-8","article-title":"Intravesical migration of intrauterine device","volume":"147","author":"Dietrick,","year":"1992","journal-title":"J. Urol."},{"key":"R12-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.173.2.10430169","article-title":"Vesicle calculus caused by migrant intrauterine device","volume":"173","author":"Lu,","year":"1999","journal-title":"An. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"R13-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S6914","article-title":"Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine copper T-380A contraceptive device","volume":"2","author":"Kaneshiro,","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int. J. Womens Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R14-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1186\/s13256-017-1461-6","article-title":"A large bladder stone caused by the intravesical migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device: a case report","volume":"22;11","author":"De Silva,","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Med Case Reports"},{"issue":"2","key":"R15-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1159\/000281680","article-title":"Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Japan: a chronological and geographical study","volume":"45","author":"Yoshida,","year":"1990","journal-title":"Urol. Int."},{"issue":"8","key":"R16-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1129","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1632-8","article-title":"Intrauterine device embedded into the bladder wall with stone formation: laparoscopic removal is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery","volume":"23","author":"Shin,","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"R17-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(02)01883-6","article-title":"Intravesical migration of intrauterine device resulting in stone formation","volume":"60","author":"Atakan,","year":"2002","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"40","key":"R18-84-20260423","article-title":"Intra uterine device migrating into the bladder with stone formation","volume":"26","author":"Chakir,","year":"2021","journal-title":"Urol. Case Rep."},{"issue":"27","key":"R19-84-20260423","article-title":"Robot-assisted removal of a partially Intravesical intrauterine device (IUD) and large bladder stone","volume":"2023","author":"Heaney,","year":"2023","journal-title":"Case Rep. Urol."},{"issue":"8","key":"R20-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1129","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1632-8","article-title":"Intrauterine device embedded into the bladder wall with stone formation: laparoscopic removal is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery","volume":"23","author":"Shin,","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"R21-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0413-x","article-title":"Urinary complications of migrated intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"19","author":"El-Hefnawy,","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct."},{"key":"R22-84-20260423","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410X.1997.00165.x","article-title":"Vesical calculus around an intra-uterine contraceptive device","volume":"79","author":"Maskey,","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br. J. Urol."}],"container-title":["International Journal of Surgery Case Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2210261224013439?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2210261224013439?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2024.110562","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,23]],"date-time":"2026-04-23T21:03:29Z","timestamp":1776978209000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2024.110562"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"C","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijscr.2024.110562","relation":{},"ISSN":["2210-2612"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2210-2612","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-09-25","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-11-02","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}