{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T21:41:10Z","timestamp":1769636470202,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":75,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,1]],"date-time":"2016-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1480550400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","jacr.org","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of the American College of Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,28]],"date-time":"2016-10-28T18:01:36Z","timestamp":1477677696000},"page":"1483-1493","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"special_numbering":"PA","title":["ACR Appropriateness Criteria Assessment of Fetal Well-Being"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Lynn","family":"Simpson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nadia J.","family":"Khati","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sandeep P.","family":"Deshmukh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kika M.","family":"Dudiak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mukesh G.","family":"Harisinghani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tara L.","family":"Henrichsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Benjamin J.","family":"Meyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David A.","family":"Nyberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Liina","family":"Poder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas D.","family":"Shipp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carolyn M.","family":"Zelop","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Phyllis","family":"Glanc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318197bd8a","article-title":"Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop","volume":"113","author":"Signore","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)80016-8","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Number 9, October 1999 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 188, January 1994). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists","volume":"68","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S3","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32615-9","article-title":"Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline","volume":"29","author":"Liston","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.022","article-title":"Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"206","author":"Berkley","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1052","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181da93da","article-title":"First- and second-trimester maternal serum markers for aneuploidy and adverse obstetric outcomes","volume":"115","author":"Dugoff","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90164-6","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death","volume":"160","author":"Moore","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S5","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-9-S1-S5","article-title":"Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during\u00a0pregnancy and labour","volume":"9","author":"Haws","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMC Preg Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1097\/RUQ.0b013e31829ea221","article-title":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria\u00ae growth disturbances\u2014risk of intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"29","author":"Zelop","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Q"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib9","first-page":"326","article-title":"Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial","volume":"64","author":"Manning","year":"1984","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199503000-00006","article-title":"Dynamic ultrasound-based fetal assessment: the fetal biophysical profile score","volume":"38","author":"Manning","year":"1995","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.20116","article-title":"Using fetal acoustic stimulation to shorten the biophysical profile","volume":"33","author":"Pinette","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.078","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index vs single deepest pocket technique during modified biophysical profile: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"191","author":"Chauhan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1902","article-title":"Reference ranges for serial measurements of blood velocity and pulsatility index at the intra-abdominal portion, and fetal and placental\u00a0ends of the umbilical artery","volume":"26","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2006.081","article-title":"Umbilical artery pulsatility index: reliability at different sampling sites","volume":"34","author":"Figueras","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600604757","article-title":"Variation in Doppler indices along the length of the cord from the intraabdominal to the placental insertion","volume":"85","author":"Khare","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14818","article-title":"Impact of cerebral redistribution on neurodevelopmental outcome in small-for-gestational-age or growth-restricted babies: a systematic review","volume":"46","author":"Meher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","article-title":"The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses","volume":"213","author":"DeVore","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14822","article-title":"Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 30-34 weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"45","author":"Bakalis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","article-title":"Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission?","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15664","article-title":"Fetal cerebral redistribution: a marker of compromise regardless of fetal size","volume":"46","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2005.08.005","article-title":"Fetal congestive heart failure","volume":"10","author":"Huhta","year":"2005","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1159\/000330762","article-title":"Echocardiographic risk stratification of fetuses with sacrococcygeal teratoma and twin-reversed arterial perfusion","volume":"30","author":"Byrne","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e3181fdffd9","article-title":"Doppler in fetal heart failure","volume":"53","author":"Huhta","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2015.03.007","article-title":"Clinical relevance of fetal hemodynamic monitoring: perinatal implications","volume":"20","author":"Pruetz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2813","article-title":"Assessment of the intraobserver variability in the measurement of fetal cardiothoracic ratio using ellipse and diameter methods","volume":"28","author":"Awadh","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib26","first-page":"1067","article-title":"AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography","volume":"32","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2597","article-title":"Development of z-scores for fetal cardiac dimensions from echocardiography","volume":"26","author":"Schneider","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6278","article-title":"Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: longitudinal changes in ductus venosus and aortic isthmus flow","volume":"33","author":"Figueras","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1540-8175.2001.t01-1-00009.x","article-title":"Quantitative assessment of fetal ventricular function: establishing normal values of the myocardial performance index in the fetus","volume":"18","author":"Eidem","year":"2001","journal-title":"Echocardiography"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11","article-title":"Fetal cardiac function assessed by Doppler myocardial performance index (Tei index)","volume":"21","author":"Friedman","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1442-200x.1999.01155.x","article-title":"Serial evaluation for myocardial performance in fetuses and neonates using a new Doppler index","volume":"41","author":"Tsutsumi","year":"1999","journal-title":"Pediatr Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1159\/000074256","article-title":"The fetal Doppler mechanical PR interval: a validation study","volume":"19","author":"Glickstein","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.047","article-title":"Prospective echocardiographic evaluation of atrioventricular conduction in fetuses with maternal Sjogren\u2019s antibodies","volume":"191","author":"Van Bergen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib34","first-page":"CD001450","article-title":"Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70305-8","article-title":"The modified biophysical profile:\u00a0antepartum testing in the 1990s","volume":"174","author":"Miller","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib36","first-page":"CD001450","article-title":"Routine Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy","author":"Bricker","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(87)80077-7","article-title":"Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths","volume":"157","author":"Manning","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.07.035","article-title":"The effectiveness of antepartum surveillance in reducing the risk of stillbirth in patients with advanced maternal age","volume":"170","author":"Fox","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib39","first-page":"CD000038","article-title":"Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies","author":"Lalor","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000131618.14176.00","article-title":"Biophysical profile with amniotic fluid volume assessments","volume":"104","author":"Magann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.10.018","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"104","author":"Nabhan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7210697","article-title":"Low amniotic fluid index as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"22","author":"Voxman","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.03.011","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes of isolated oligohydramnios at term and post-term pregnancy: a systematic review of literature with meta-analysis","volume":"169","author":"Rossi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.545918","article-title":"Risk factors for intrauterine fetal death (1988-2009)","volume":"24","author":"Ohana","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70345-0","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes after antepartum diagnosis of oligohydramnios at or beyond 34 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"182","author":"Casey","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(96)02551-1","article-title":"Polyhydramnios is an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality and intrapartum morbidity in preterm delivery","volume":"70","author":"Mazor","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"410.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.022","article-title":"The risk of fetal death in nonanomalous pregnancies\u00a0affected by polyhydramnios","volume":"213","author":"Pilliod","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10093","article-title":"Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios","volume":"39","author":"Pri-Paz","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.01.010","article-title":"Relationship between abnormal fetal testing and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"196","author":"Gonzalez","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70505-9","article-title":"Umbilical artery doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance","volume":"182","author":"Baschat","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050601134926","article-title":"Evaluation of the use of umbilical artery Doppler flow studies and outcome of pregnancies at a secondary hospital","volume":"20","author":"Hugo","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib52","first-page":"CD007529","article-title":"Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib53","first-page":"CD007113","article-title":"Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth","author":"Grivell","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70494-7","article-title":"A\u00a0pilot randomized controlled trial of two regimens of fetal surveillance for small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry","volume":"182","author":"McCowan","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5363","article-title":"The value of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the antenatal surveillance of uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies","volume":"31","author":"Hack","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00415.x","article-title":"A\u00a0critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics","volume":"17","author":"Westergaard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.34.4.569","article-title":"Do Doppler studies enhance surveillance of uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins?","volume":"34","author":"Pessel","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5177","article-title":"Prediction of outcome of fetal congenital heart disease using a cardiovascular profile score","volume":"31","author":"Wieczorek","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5210","article-title":"Human fetal cardiovascular profile score and neonatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"31","author":"Makikallio","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.707661","article-title":"Utility of cardiac monitoring in fetuses at risk for congenital heart block: the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) prospective study","volume":"117","author":"Friedman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4254","article-title":"Functional echocardiography in the fetus with non-cardiac disease","volume":"34","author":"Van Mieghem","year":"2014","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00591.x","article-title":"The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens","volume":"18","author":"Baschat","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2657","article-title":"Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results","volume":"27","author":"Baschat","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.008","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction and absent or reverse end-diastolic blood flow in umbilical artery (Doppler class II or III): a retrospective study of short- and long-term fetal morbidity and mortality","volume":"126","author":"Gerber","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1991.01030192.x","article-title":"The clinical significance of absent or reverse end-diastolic flow in the fetal aorta and umbilical artery","volume":"1","author":"Mandruzzato","year":"1991","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9041","article-title":"Neurobehavioral outcomes in preterm, growth-restricted infants with and without prenatal advanced signs of brain-sparing","volume":"38","author":"Figueras","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9011","article-title":"Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction","volume":"38","author":"Turan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5237","article-title":"Doppler assessment of the aortic isthmus and perinatal outcome in preterm fetuses with severe intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"31","author":"Del Rio","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4101","article-title":"Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"30","author":"Turan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1914","article-title":"Qualitative venous Doppler flow waveform analysis in preterm intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses with ARED flow in the umbilical artery\u2014correlation with short-term outcome","volume":"25","author":"Schwarze","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2002.00627.x","article-title":"Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus","volume":"19","author":"Ferrazzi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.039","article-title":"Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist?","volume":"209","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x","article-title":"Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study","volume":"18","author":"Hecher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"989","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02417.x","article-title":"The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study","volume":"110","author":"Morris","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028_bib75","unstructured":"American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria\u00ae: radiation dose assessment introduction. Available at: http:\/\/www.acr.org\/\u223c\/media\/ACR\/Documents\/AppCriteria\/RadiationDoseAssessmentIntro.pdf. Accessed October 19, 2016."}],"container-title":["Journal of the American College of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1546144016308043?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1546144016308043?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,7]],"date-time":"2018-09-07T01:22:55Z","timestamp":1536283375000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1546144016308043"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"references-count":75,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S1546144016308043"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028","relation":{},"ISSN":["1546-1440"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1546-1440","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria Assessment of Fetal Well-Being","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacr.2016.08.028","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2016 American College of Radiology","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}