{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,15]],"date-time":"2026-01-15T04:09:11Z","timestamp":1768450151087,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,1]],"date-time":"2019-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1556668800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","jacr.org","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.com.au","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of the American College of Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,1]],"date-time":"2019-05-01T09:08:08Z","timestamp":1556701688000},"page":"S116-S125","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"special_numbering":"S","title":["ACR Appropriateness Criteria\u00ae Growth Disturbances-Risk of Fetal Growth Restriction"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Thomas D.","family":"Shipp","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carolyn M.","family":"Zelop","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Katherine E.","family":"Maturen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sandeep Prakash","family":"Deshmukh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kika M.","family":"Dudiak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tara L.","family":"Henrichsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Edward R.","family":"Oliver","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Liina","family":"Poder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth A.","family":"Sadowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lynn","family":"Simpson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Therese M.","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tom","family":"Winter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Phyllis","family":"Glanc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000232","article-title":"A\u00a0practical approach to fetal growth restriction","volume":"123","author":"Copel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2016.10.006","article-title":"An integrated approach to fetal growth restriction","volume":"38","author":"Figueras","year":"2017","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2000.19.10.661","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction and Doppler ultrasonography","volume":"19","author":"Ott","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12391","article-title":"Neurodevelopmental outcome of full-term small-for-gestational-age infants with normal placental function","volume":"42","author":"Savchev","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13319","article-title":"Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term","volume":"43","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14758","article-title":"Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise?","volume":"46","author":"Prior","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","article-title":"A\u00a0randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation","volume":"110","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4412","article-title":"Stage-based approach to the management of fetal growth restriction","volume":"34","author":"Figueras","year":"2014","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16809-8","article-title":"Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial","volume":"364","author":"Thornton","year":"2004","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.015","article-title":"Number of episodes of reduced fetal movement at term: association with adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"213","author":"Scala","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9","article-title":"134: fetal growth restriction","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.22025","article-title":"Doppler study of the fetal vertebral and middle cerebral arteries in fetuses with normal and increased umbilical artery resistance indices","volume":"41","author":"Morales Rosello","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0128","article-title":"Cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and placental histopathological features in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction","volume":"42","author":"Spinillo","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","article-title":"The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses","volume":"213","author":"DeVore","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2014.211","article-title":"Doppler for growth restriction: the association between the cerebroplacental ratio and a reduced interval to delivery","volume":"35","author":"Warshak","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2017.02.006","article-title":"Review: systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"54","author":"Dunn","year":"2017","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1240","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000187540.37795.3a","article-title":"Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"106","author":"Cosmi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75","article-title":"Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction","volume":"109","author":"Baschat","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.09.020","article-title":"Cardiac function in early onset small for gestational age and growth restricted fetuses","volume":"171","author":"Hassan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13060","article-title":"Placental pulsatility index: a new, more sensitive parameter for predicting adverse outcome in pregnancies suspected of fetal growth restriction","volume":"96","author":"Gudmundsson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90491-Z","article-title":"Fetal growth retardation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities","volume":"168","author":"Snijders","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1332","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4476","article-title":"Uterine artery Doppler longitudinal changes in pregnancies complicated with intrauterine growth restriction without preeclampsia","volume":"34","author":"Contro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1159\/000355525","article-title":"Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"36","author":"Savchev","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"211","author":"Crimmins","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14915","article-title":"Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks\u2019 gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE)","volume":"46","author":"Roma","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8389(22)01229-5","article-title":"The use of sonography in the evaluation of the high-risk pregnancy","volume":"28","author":"Manning","year":"1990","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1265","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.34.7.1265","article-title":"Evaluating the optimal definition of abnormal first-trimester uterine artery Doppler parameters to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"34","author":"Carter","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"594 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.06.013","article-title":"Role of early second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening to predict small-for-gestational-age babies in nulliparous women","volume":"217","author":"Parry","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2107","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.32.12.2107","article-title":"Third-trimester abnormal uterine artery Doppler findings are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"32","author":"Shwarzman","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90396-O","article-title":"An evaluation of the efficacy of Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis as a screening test in pregnancy","volume":"162","author":"Newnham","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14855","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure at 19-24 weeks","volume":"46","author":"Lesmes","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14706","article-title":"Clinical utility of third-trimester uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of brain hemodynamic deterioration and adverse perinatal outcome in small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"45","author":"Cruz-Martinez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90466-2","article-title":"Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"172","author":"Alfirevic","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14714","article-title":"An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"45","author":"Figueras","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.899574","article-title":"Prognostic value of obstetric Doppler ultrasound in fetuses with fetal growth restriction: an observational study in a tertiary care hospital","volume":"28","author":"Isalm","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib38","first-page":"221","article-title":"Comparison of perinatal outcome in growth restricted fetuses retaining normal umbilical artery Doppler flow to those with diminished end-diastolic flow","volume":"26","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.07.033","article-title":"Defining the residual risk of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with normal umbilical artery blood flow","volume":"211","author":"O\u2019Dwyer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.039","article-title":"Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist?","volume":"209","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1018170","article-title":"When is the optimal time to deliver late preterm IUGR fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers?","volume":"29","author":"Lee","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib42","first-page":"523","article-title":"Early term versus term delivery in the management of fetal growth restriction: a comparison of two protocols","volume":"32","author":"Dahlke","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000737","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes with normal compared with elevated umbilical artery systolic-to-diastolic ratios in fetal growth restriction","volume":"125","author":"Maggio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13052","article-title":"Fetal hemodynamics and adverse outcome in primary school-aged children with fetal growth restriction: a prospective longitudinal study","volume":"96","author":"Korkalainen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1007\/s13312-013-0235-5","article-title":"Outcome of very low birth weight infants with abnormal antenatal Doppler flow patterns: a prospective cohort study","volume":"50","author":"Lakshmi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Indian Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14818","article-title":"Impact of cerebral redistribution on neurodevelopmental outcome in small-for-gestational-age or growth-restricted babies: a systematic review","volume":"46","author":"Meher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3","article-title":"2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial","volume":"385","author":"Lees","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18815","article-title":"Severe fetal growth restriction at 26-32 weeks: key messages from the TRUFFLE study","volume":"50","author":"Bilardo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17361","article-title":"Fetal monitoring indications for delivery and 2-year outcome in 310 infants with\u00a0fetal growth restriction delivered before 32 weeks\u2019 gestation in the TRUFFLE study","volume":"50","author":"Visser","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.24011","article-title":"ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013","volume":"37","author":"Kanal","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Magn Reson Imaging"}],"container-title":["Journal of the American College of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1546144019301498?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1546144019301498?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,17]],"date-time":"2022-09-17T06:42:09Z","timestamp":1663396929000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1546144019301498"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S1546144019301498"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["1546-1440"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1546-1440","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria\u00ae Growth Disturbances-Risk of Fetal Growth Restriction","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.02.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 American College of Radiology","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}