{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]],"date-time":"2026-04-27T21:50:06Z","timestamp":1777326606571,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]],"date-time":"2020-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1588291200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]],"date-time":"2020-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1588291200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100014349","name":"Society For Maternal-Fetal Medicine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100014349","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100002575","name":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100002575","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jacr.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of the American College of Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]],"date-time":"2020-05-01T04:11:20Z","timestamp":1588306280000},"page":"S26-S35","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"special_numbering":"S","title":["ACR Appropriateness Criteria\u00ae Assessment of Gravid Cervix"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Edward R.","family":"Oliver","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Katherine E.","family":"Maturen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vickie A.","family":"Feldstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Liina","family":"Poder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas D.","family":"Shipp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lynn","family":"Simpson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Loretta M.","family":"Strachowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Betsy L.","family":"Sussman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Therese M.","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tom","family":"Winter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Phyllis","family":"Glanc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60820-4","article-title":"National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications","volume":"379","author":"Blencowe","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2016","volume":"67","author":"Martin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib3","series-title":"Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention","article-title":"Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","article-title":"The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network","volume":"334","author":"Iams","year":"1996","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ca847","article-title":"Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis","volume":"117","author":"Berghella","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa067815","article-title":"Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening G. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix","volume":"357","author":"Fonseca","year":"2007","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1800","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60030-0","article-title":"Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"379","author":"Goya","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9017","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"38","author":"Hassan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.022","article-title":"The choice of progestogen for the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy and prior preterm birth","volume":"216","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S476","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2017.08.051","article-title":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria\u00ae Multiple Gestations","volume":"14","author":"Glanc","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001820","article-title":"Assessment of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length image quality","volume":"129","author":"Boelig","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.07.032","article-title":"Adherence to criteria for transvaginal ultrasound imaging and measurement of cervical length","volume":"209","author":"Iams","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2014-0382","article-title":"Strain at the internal cervical os assessed with quasi-static elastography is associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery at <\/=34 weeks of gestation","volume":"43","author":"Hernandez-Andrade","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12344","article-title":"Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography","volume":"41","author":"Hernandez-Andrade","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0277","article-title":"Cervical strain determined by ultrasound elastography and its association with spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"42","author":"Hernandez-Andrade","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-238","article-title":"Elastography in predicting preterm delivery in asymptomatic, low-risk women: a prospective observational study","volume":"14","author":"Wozniak","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib18","first-page":"65","article-title":"Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success","volume":"36","author":"Fruscalzo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12389","article-title":"Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time","volume":"93","author":"Hee","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.32.6.937","article-title":"Imaging analysis of cervical elastography for prediction of successful induction of labor at term","volume":"32","author":"Hwang","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1159\/000355084","article-title":"Sonoelastography as method for preliminary evaluation of uterine cervix to predict success of induction of labor","volume":"35","author":"Muscatello","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2014-0356","article-title":"Cervical sonoelastography for improving prediction of preterm birth compared with cervical length measurement and fetal fibronectin test","volume":"43","author":"von Schoning","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.12.021","article-title":"Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length?","volume":"208","author":"Friedman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.022","article-title":"Prospective evaluation of a protocol for using transabdominal ultrasound to screen for short cervix","volume":"213","author":"Pandipati","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x","article-title":"Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography","volume":"17","author":"Cicero","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00378.x","article-title":"Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women","volume":"45","author":"Ozdemir","year":"2005","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.10.1071","article-title":"Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: transperineal versus endovaginal imaging","volume":"20","author":"Hertzberg","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.020","article-title":"A\u00a0universal mid-trimester transvaginal cervical length screening program and its associated reduced preterm birth rate","volume":"214","author":"Son","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002","article-title":"Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes","volume":"214","author":"Temming","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000428","article-title":"A\u00a0universal transvaginal cervical length screening program for preterm birth prevention","volume":"124","author":"Orzechowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.1373","article-title":"Predictive accuracy of serial transvaginal cervical lengths and quantitative vaginal fetal fibronectin levels for spontaneous preterm birth among nulliparous women","volume":"317","author":"Esplin","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib33","first-page":"742","article-title":"Confirming the safety of transvaginal sonography in patients suspected of placenta previa","volume":"81","author":"Timor-Tritsch","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12111","article-title":"Can transabdominal ultrasound identify women at high risk for short cervical length?","volume":"92","author":"Friedman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12204","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of cervical length at 18-21 weeks\u2019 gestation in an Australian obstetric population: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approaches","volume":"54","author":"Marren","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b","article-title":"Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth","volume":"120","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.027","article-title":"The role of routine cervical length screening in selected high- and low-risk women for preterm birth prevention","volume":"215","author":"McIntosh","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12361","article-title":"Factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth risk assessed by transvaginal ultrasound following cervical cerclage","volume":"55","author":"Sim","year":"2015","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2181","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.33.12.2181","article-title":"Association between sonographic cervical appearance and preterm delivery after a history-indicated cerclage","volume":"33","author":"Miller","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3229-1","article-title":"Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor","volume":"290","author":"Gauthier","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2016.1154513","article-title":"Use of transperineal sonography during preterm labor","volume":"36","author":"Dimassi","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.10.624","article-title":"A\u00a0short cervix in women with preterm labor and intact membranes: a risk factor for microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity","volume":"192","author":"Gomez","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib43","first-page":"1","article-title":"Is cervical length evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography helpful in detecting true preterm labor?","author":"Maia","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000022","article-title":"Predictive value of cervical length in women with threatened preterm labor","volume":"122","author":"Melamed","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2631","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.12007","article-title":"Role of cervical length measurement for preterm delivery prediction in women with threatened preterm labor and cervical dilatation","volume":"35","author":"Hiersch","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12316","article-title":"Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study","volume":"41","author":"Hassan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0704-z","article-title":"Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor","volume":"15","author":"Benediktsdottir","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12649","article-title":"Transperineal ultrasonography for labor management: accuracy and reliability","volume":"94","author":"Yuce","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12467","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"42","author":"Verhoeven","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2016.1229274","article-title":"Sonographical predictive markers of failure of induction of labour in term pregnancy","volume":"37","author":"Brik","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13411","article-title":"Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography","volume":"44","author":"Pereira","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib52","first-page":"3511","article-title":"Predicting success of labor induction in singleton term pregnancies by combining maternal and ultrasound variables","volume":"29","author":"Prado","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib53","first-page":"CD010762","article-title":"Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening","author":"Ezebialu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.03.031","article-title":"The use of cervical sonography to differentiate true from false labor in term patients presenting for labor check","volume":"215","author":"Kunzier","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.24011","article-title":"ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013","volume":"37","author":"Kanal","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Magn Reson Imaging"}],"container-title":["Journal of the American College of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1546144020301204?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1546144020301204?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T06:23:51Z","timestamp":1761546231000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1546144020301204"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S1546144020301204"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032","relation":{},"ISSN":["1546-1440"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1546-1440","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria\u00ae Assessment of Gravid Cervix","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.032","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 American College of Radiology","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}