{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T12:10:04Z","timestamp":1769602204945,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,1]],"date-time":"2021-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1614556800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,1]],"date-time":"2021-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1614556800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,26]],"date-time":"2020-08-26T22:16:30Z","timestamp":1598480190000},"page":"135-140","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Colposcopic endocervical brushing cytology appears to be more sensitive than histologic endocervical curettage for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6548-3424","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tianle","family":"Zou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1975-6230","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shubha","family":"Dave","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ronald N.","family":"Adler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mark J.","family":"Manning","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mary Patricia","family":"Scott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cara","family":"Strock","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dina","family":"Kandil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ediz","family":"Cosar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andrew H.","family":"Fischer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2008.09.007","article-title":"To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains","volume":"35","author":"Driggers","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000525","article-title":"2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors","volume":"24","author":"Perkins","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Low Genit Tract Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000322","article-title":"Evidence-based consensus recommendations for colposcopy practice for cervical cancer prevention in the United States","volume":"21","author":"Wentzensen","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Low Genit Tract Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182883a34","article-title":"2012 Updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors","volume":"121","author":"Massad","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2019.05.001","article-title":"Role of ThinPrep liquid-based cytology in evaluation of the endocervical canal in patients with abnormal cervical screening","volume":"8","author":"Al-Nourhji","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Soc Cytopathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2019.08.067","article-title":"Accuracy of Pap testing and endocervical curettings in diagnosing primary endocervical glandular lesions","volume":"8","author":"Bruehl","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Soc Cytopathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib7","first-page":"27","article-title":"Using cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal after loop excision","volume":"6","author":"Dinh","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Low Genit Tract Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2542-9","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of two endocervical sampling method: randomized controlled trial","volume":"287","author":"Goksedef","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.20448","article-title":"Endocervical curetting vs. endocervical brushing as case finding methods","volume":"34","author":"Maksem","year":"2006","journal-title":"Diagn Cytopathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib10","first-page":"426","article-title":"A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette","volume":"101","author":"Boardman","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0186812","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0186812","article-title":"User perception of endocervical sampling: a randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush","volume":"12","author":"Undurraga","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80038-3","article-title":"Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal","volume":"159","author":"Andersen","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib13","first-page":"195","article-title":"Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal","volume":"14","author":"Martin","year":"1995","journal-title":"P R Health Sci J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib14","first-page":"677","article-title":"Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?","volume":"33","author":"Weitzman","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.critrevonc.2019.01.006","article-title":"Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: pathologic features, treatment options, clinical outcome and prognostic variables","volume":"135","author":"Gadducci","year":"2019","journal-title":"Crit Rev Oncol Hematol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1002\/cncy.21724","article-title":"Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells in Pap tests: an analysis of more than 3000 cases at a large academic women's center","volume":"124","author":"Pradhan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cancer Cytopathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2019.07.006","article-title":"Cytologic processing of ureteral microbiopsies is associated with higher sensitivity for detection of urothelial carcinoma compared with conventional biopsy processing","volume":"9","author":"Sheridan","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Am Soc Cytopathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib18","first-page":"297","article-title":"Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening","volume":"68","author":"Smith","year":"2018","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2011.3385","article-title":"Cervical cancer trends in the United States: a 35-year population-based analysis","volume":"21","author":"Adegoke","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0215(19980209)75:4<536::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-U","article-title":"International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas","volume":"75","author":"Vizcaino","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.24010","article-title":"Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and older","volume":"124","author":"Meijer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2018.12.004","article-title":"Challenges in the Pap diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ","volume":"8","author":"Niu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Soc Cytopathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1002\/cncy.21343","article-title":"The Cellient automated cell block system is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Papanicolaou tests","volume":"122","author":"Xing","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cancer Cytopathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1995.1118","article-title":"Management and follow-up of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix","volume":"57","author":"Poynor","year":"1995","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00083-X","article-title":"Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: significance of cone biopsy margins","volume":"88","author":"Wolf","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.5505\/ejm.2019.64325","article-title":"Agreement between endocervical brush and endocervical curettage for the diagnosis of cervical cancer","volume":"24","author":"Bestel","year":"2019","journal-title":"East J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709047788","article-title":"Cytobrush and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of dysplasia and malignancy of the uterine cervix","volume":"76","author":"Mogensen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"iii","DOI":"10.3310\/hta8340","article-title":"Evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding: comparison of three outpatient procedures within cohorts defined by age and menopausal status","volume":"8","author":"Critchley","year":"2004","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1111\/cyt.12177","article-title":"Increasing the sensitivity of endocervical curettings by performing ThinPrep\u00ae Pap on transport container fluid: is diagnostic material going down the drain?","volume":"26","author":"Lastra","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cytopathology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1002\/jcb.22585","article-title":"The cytologic criteria of malignancy","volume":"110","author":"Fischer","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Cell Biochem"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00470-5","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage","volume":"90","author":"Tate","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib32","first-page":"159","article-title":"The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy","volume":"45","author":"Stillson","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Fam Pract"},{"issue":"4 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib33","first-page":"573","article-title":"Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush","volume":"82","author":"Hoffman","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008_bib34","first-page":"159","article-title":"The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy","volume":"74","author":"el-Dabh","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2213294520302799?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2213294520302799?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T06:46:48Z","timestamp":1761979608000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2213294520302799"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S2213294520302799"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["2213-2945"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2213-2945","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Colposcopic endocervical brushing cytology appears to be more sensitive than histologic endocervical curettage for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jasc.2020.08.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}