{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T09:36:20Z","timestamp":1787736980535,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,12]],"date-time":"2012-02-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1329004800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Business Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,3]],"date-time":"2012-03-03T23:09:59Z","timestamp":1330816199000},"page":"1298-1306","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["\u201cTranslating\u201d between survey answer formats"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"66","author":[{"given":"Sara","family":"Dolnicar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bettina","family":"Gr\u00fcn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1037\/h0055647","article-title":"Reliability and the number of rating scale categories","volume":"38","author":"Bendig","year":"1954","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Psychology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0010","first-page":"53","article-title":"Reliability testing of psychographic scales: Five-point or seven-point? Anchored or labeled?","volume":"21","author":"Boote","year":"1981","journal-title":"Journal of Advertising Research"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1037\/h0054522","article-title":"Optimal refinement of the rating scale","volume":"23","author":"Champney","year":"1939","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Psychology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1177\/014662168500900103","article-title":"The effect of number of rating scale categories upon levels of interrater reliability: A Monte Carlo investigation","volume":"9","author":"Cicchetti","year":"1985","journal-title":"Applied Psychological Measurement"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.2307\/3150495","article-title":"The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review","volume":"17","author":"Cox","year":"1980","journal-title":"Journal of Marketing Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jretconser.2006.09.006","article-title":"How constrained a response: A comparison of binary, ordinal and metric answer formats","volume":"14","author":"Dolnicar","year":"2007","journal-title":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/S1441-3582(07)70041-1","article-title":"Question stability in brand image measurement \u2014 Comparing alternative answer formats and accounting for heterogeneity in descriptive models","volume":"15","author":"Dolnicar","year":"2007","journal-title":"Australasian Marketing Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ausmj.2009.04.001","article-title":"Does one size fit all? The suitability of answer formats for different constructs measured","volume":"17","author":"Dolnicar","year":"2009","journal-title":"Australasian Marketing Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.2501\/IJMR-53-2-231-252","article-title":"Quick, simple and reliable: Forced binary survey questions","volume":"53","author":"Dolnicar","year":"2011","journal-title":"International Journal of Market Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijresmar.2007.10.002","article-title":"The low stability of brand\u2013attribute associations is partly due to measurement factors","volume":"25","author":"Dolnicar","year":"2008","journal-title":"International Journal of Research in Marketing"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0180","series-title":"Proceedings of the 2006 AWWA Desalination Symposium (CD)","article-title":"Public perception of desalinated versus recycled water in Australia","author":"Dolnicar","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1177\/001316447203200203","article-title":"Effects of some variations in rating scale characteristics on the means and reliabilities of rating","volume":"32","author":"Finn","year":"1972","journal-title":"Educational and Psychological Measurement"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1037\/h0043047","article-title":"Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission","volume":"67","author":"Garner","year":"1960","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.2307\/1249817","article-title":"Rating scales and information recovery \u2014 How many scales and response categories to use?","volume":"34","author":"Green","year":"1970","journal-title":"Journal of Marketing"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.2307\/1250267","article-title":"Testing thirteen attitude scales for agreement and brand discrimination","volume":"43","author":"Haley","year":"1979","journal-title":"Journal of Marketing"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/0003-6870(91)90153-9","article-title":"The effect of scale manipulations on validity: Targeting frequency rating scales for anticipated performance levels","volume":"22","author":"Hancock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Applied Ergonomics"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1177\/0022022189203004","article-title":"Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style","volume":"20","author":"Hui","year":"1989","journal-title":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0090","first-page":"58","article-title":"Melbourne office worker attitudes to recycled water use","volume":"33","author":"Hurlimann","year":"2006","journal-title":"Water (Journal of the Australian Water Association)"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.62.4.392","article-title":"A Monte Carlo study of factors affecting three indices of composite scale reliability","volume":"62","author":"Jenkins","year":"1977","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Psychology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1177\/001316446502500404","article-title":"Number of scale points and the reliability of scales","volume":"25","author":"Komorita","year":"1965","journal-title":"Educational and Psychological Measurement"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0105","first-page":"1","article-title":"A technique for the measurement of attitudes","volume":"140","author":"Likert","year":"1932","journal-title":"Archives of Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1037\/h0076268","article-title":"Effect of the number of scale points on reliability: A Monte Carlo approach","volume":"60","author":"Lissitz","year":"1975","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Psychology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1177\/001316447403400307","article-title":"An investigation of the effect of the number of scale intervals on principal components factor analysis","volume":"34","author":"Martin","year":"1974","journal-title":"Educational and Psychological Measurement"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0120","first-page":"495","article-title":"Communication and research notes","volume":"8","author":"Matell","year":"1971","journal-title":"Journal of Marketing Research"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1177\/001316447103100307","article-title":"Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study 1: Reliability and validity","volume":"31","author":"Matell","year":"1971","journal-title":"Educational and Psychological Measurement"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1037\/h0043158","article-title":"The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information","volume":"63","author":"Miller","year":"1956","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.2466\/pms.1989.68.2.549","article-title":"Number of alternatives per choice point and stability of Likert-type scales","volume":"68","author":"Oaster","year":"1989","journal-title":"Perceptual and Motor Skills"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1037\/h0039737","article-title":"Two components in bipolar scales: Direction and extremeness","volume":"69","author":"Peabody","year":"1962","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1037\/h0061781","article-title":"Reliability of multiple-choice measuring instruments as a function of the Spearman\u2013Brown prophecy formula","volume":"32","author":"Remmers","year":"1941","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Psychology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-8116(02)00097-6","article-title":"The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing","volume":"19","author":"Rossiter","year":"2002","journal-title":"International Journal of Research in Marketing"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0155","series-title":"Measurement for the social sciences \u2014 The C-OAR-SE method and why it must replace psychometrics","author":"Rossiter","year":"2011"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijresmar.2004.11.005","article-title":"Measuring and modeling the (limited) reliability of free choice attitude questions","volume":"22","author":"Rungie","year":"2005","journal-title":"International Journal of Research in Marketing"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1287\/mksc.3.1.23","article-title":"Assessing validity and test\u2013retest reliability for \u201cPick K of N\u201d data","volume":"3","author":"Schmittlein","year":"1984","journal-title":"Marketing Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1177\/001316447503500210","article-title":"A comparison of variable configurations across scale lengths: An empirical study","volume":"35","author":"Schutz","year":"1975","journal-title":"Educational and Psychological Measurement"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029_bb0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1037\/h0074469","article-title":"On the loss of reliability in rating due to coarseness of the scale","volume":"7","author":"Symonds","year":"1924","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology"}],"container-title":["Journal of Business Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0148296312000616?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0148296312000616?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,25]],"date-time":"2018-11-25T10:58:34Z","timestamp":1543143514000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0148296312000616"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0148296312000616"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029","relation":{},"ISSN":["0148-2963"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0148-2963","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"\u201cTranslating\u201d between survey answer formats","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Business Research","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.02.029","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2012 Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}