{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]],"date-time":"2026-05-21T17:26:26Z","timestamp":1779384386921,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472688000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472688000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Clinical Anesthesia"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,18]],"date-time":"2016-05-18T15:15:17Z","timestamp":1463584517000},"page":"298-305","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Souvik","family":"Maitra","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dalim K.","family":"Baidya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mahesh K.","family":"Arora","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sulagna","family":"Bhattacharjee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Puneet","family":"Khanna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0005","series-title":"Intersurgical, Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom","article-title":"Intersurgical: user guide: i-gel\u00ae supraglottic airway, adult and paediatric sizes","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0010","first-page":"35","article-title":"Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme laryngeal masks","volume":"63","author":"Van Zundert","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Belg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-012-9673-0","article-title":"Brief review: the LMA Supreme supraglottic airway","volume":"59","author":"Wong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2012.04.012","article-title":"The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more effective than the LMA-Classic in pediatric anesthesia: a meta-analysis","volume":"24","author":"Zhang","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1097\/01.EJA.0000435015.89651.3d","article-title":"Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"31","author":"Maitra","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0030","first-page":"302","article-title":"Comparison of clinical performance of i-gel with LMA-Proseal in elective surgeries","volume":"53","author":"Singh","year":"2009","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0b013e3283340a81","article-title":"The supraglottic airway i-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients","volume":"27","author":"Shin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2010.06422.x","article-title":"Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel","volume":"65","author":"Gasteiger","year":"2010","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.4097\/kjae.2012.63.6.510","article-title":"Comparison of the Proseal LMA and Intersurgical i-gel during gynecological laparoscopy","volume":"63","author":"Jeon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.105798","article-title":"Comparison of clinical performance of the i-gel with LMA Proseal","volume":"29","author":"Chauhan","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0055","first-page":"80","article-title":"i-gel\u2122 in ambulatory surgery: a comparison with LMA-ProSeal\u2122 in paralyzed anaesthetized patients","volume":"8","author":"Das","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.130008","article-title":"Comparison of i-gel with Proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: a prospective randomized study","volume":"30","author":"Kini","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.74583","article-title":"PLMA vs. i-gel: a comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"26","author":"Sharma","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0070","first-page":"705869","article-title":"Influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"2015","author":"Mishra","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anesthesiol Res Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1072","DOI":"10.1111\/pan.12483","article-title":"Evaluation of i-gel(\u2122) airway in children: a meta-analysis","volume":"24","author":"Maitra","year":"2014","journal-title":"Paediatr Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.12772","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the i-gel(\u00ae) vs laryngeal mask airway in adults","author":"de Montblanc","year":"2014","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2007.05284.x","article-title":"Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu Aura once laryngeal mask with the LMA classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients","volume":"63","author":"Shariffuddin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","article-title":"Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample","volume":"5","author":"Hozo","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0095","first-page":"1978","article-title":"Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery","volume":"93","author":"Shi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0100","first-page":"134","article-title":"A comparison of the single-use i-gel with the reusable laryngeal mask airway Proseal in anesthetized adult patients in Japanese population","volume":"62","author":"Hayashi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Masui"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0b013e32835aba6a","article-title":"Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"30","author":"Belena","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2005-921200","article-title":"Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the Proseal laryngeal mask airway","volume":"41","author":"Goldmann","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2008.05682.x","article-title":"The laryngeal mask airway Supreme\u2014a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients","volume":"64","author":"Eschertzhuber","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.12669\/pjms.292.2980","article-title":"Comparison of postoperative complication between laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube during low-flow anesthesia with controlled ventilation","volume":"29","author":"Peirovifar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020_bb0125","first-page":"65","article-title":"Postoperative sore throat in children: comparison between proseal LMA and classic LMA","volume":"22","author":"Mokhtar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Middle East J Anesthesiol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Anesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0952818016301313?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0952818016301313?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,16]],"date-time":"2025-10-16T09:08:10Z","timestamp":1760605690000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0952818016301313"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"references-count":25,"alternative-id":["S0952818016301313"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0952-8180"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0952-8180","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}