{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,7]],"date-time":"2026-11-07T12:18:57Z","timestamp":1794053937920,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,1]],"date-time":"2019-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1567296000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,1]],"date-time":"2019-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1567296000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jclinepi.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,9]],"date-time":"2019-05-09T13:50:04Z","timestamp":1557409804000},"page":"44-57","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":104,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"113","author":[{"given":"Derya","family":"\u00c7elik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"\u00d6zge","family":"\u00c7oban","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0023-7094","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"\u00d6nder","family":"K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7o\u011flu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib1","first-page":"33","author":"Higgins","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib2","series-title":"Methods and applications of statistics in clinical trials: Concepts principles, trials, and designs","first-page":"170","article-title":"Clinical significance","author":"Kamath","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.11.016","article-title":"The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies","volume":"82","author":"Angst","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012","article-title":"Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes","volume":"61","author":"Revicki","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-014-0144-x","article-title":"Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions","volume":"10","author":"Katz","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010","article-title":"Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods","volume":"63","author":"Terwee","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement","volume":"4","author":"Moher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1097\/00002281-200203000-00006","article-title":"Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research","volume":"14","author":"Beaton","year":"2002","journal-title":"Curr Opin Rheumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2013.09.009","article-title":"Total knee replacement; minimal clinically important differences and responders","volume":"21","author":"Escobar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.150398","article-title":"Examining the minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures for individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a model using the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score","volume":"43","author":"Mills","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Rheumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwj063","article-title":"The inconsistency of \"optimal\" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve","volume":"163","author":"Perkins","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/art.24282","article-title":"Perception of improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis varies with disease activity levels at baseline","volume":"61","author":"Aletaha","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(89)90005-6","article-title":"Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference","volume":"10","author":"Jaeschke","year":"1989","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.1993.00410110045008","article-title":"Assessing the clinical importance of symptomatic improvements: an illustration in rheumatology","volume":"153","author":"Redelmeier","year":"1993","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib15","series-title":"Applied logistic regression","author":"Hosmer","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.12.011","article-title":"Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score","volume":"24","author":"Martin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1862","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2018.01.050","article-title":"Minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after revision hip arthroscopy","volume":"34","author":"Nwachukwu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2065","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546513494173","article-title":"Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery","volume":"41","author":"Kemp","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009","article-title":"Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery","volume":"68","author":"Beard","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2012.03.019","article-title":"The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: success depends on how you measure it","volume":"20","author":"Impellizzeri","year":"2012","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.62.10.935","article-title":"Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip","volume":"62","author":"Hoeksma","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546516669325","article-title":"Preoperative outcome scores are predictive of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement","volume":"45","author":"Nwachukwu","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-017-1568-3","article-title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Hip Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis","volume":"18","author":"Mart\u00edn-Fern\u00e1ndez","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1002\/acr.21570","article-title":"Outcomes after total hip replacement based on patients' baseline status: what results can be expected?","volume":"64","author":"Quintana","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0000000000000609","article-title":"Responsiveness and minimal important changes of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index in subjects undergoing rehabilitation following hip fracture","volume":"96","author":"Monticone","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2005.06.012","article-title":"Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement","volume":"13","author":"Quintana","year":"2005","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.2004.022905","article-title":"Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement","volume":"64","author":"Tubach","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.10.014","article-title":"Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR\/TKR surgery","volume":"61","author":"Chesworth","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2432","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000456","article-title":"What are the minimal and substantial improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR versions after total joint replacement?","volume":"476","author":"Lyman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2018.1480739","article-title":"Minimal important change values for the Oxford knee score and the forgotten joint score at 1 year after total knee replacement","volume":"89","author":"Ingelsrud","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1933","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-013-2776-5","article-title":"The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty","volume":"22","author":"Clement","year":"2014","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e003365","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003365","article-title":"Extending the use of PROMs in the NHS--using the Oxford Knee Score in patients undergoing non-operative management for knee osteoarthritis: a validation study","volume":"3","author":"Harris","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3354","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-016-4208-9","article-title":"The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis","volume":"25","author":"Lee","year":"2017","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc : official J ESSKA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2012.4038","article-title":"Comparison of reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported clinical outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation","volume":"42","author":"Williams","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Orthop Sports Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546509354163","volume":"38","author":"Greco","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.01.039","article-title":"Predictors of satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty","volume":"30","author":"Maratt","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1186\/1756-0500-5-58","article-title":"Clinically important improvement in the WOMAC and predictor factors for response to non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritic patients: a prospective study","volume":"5","author":"Hmamouchi","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Res Notes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2018.7676","article-title":"The ShortMAC: minimum important change of a reduced version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index","volume":"48","author":"Abbott","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Orthop Sports Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.2010.135483","article-title":"Validation of a numerical rating scale to assess functional impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis: comparison with the WOMAC function scale","volume":"70","author":"Ornetti","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2006.09.001","article-title":"Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement","volume":"15","author":"Escobar","year":"2007","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2014.06.006","article-title":"Concordance between important change and acceptable symptom state following knee arthroplasty: the role of baseline scores","volume":"22","author":"Escobar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e000685","DOI":"10.1136\/rmdopen-2018-000685","article-title":"Multidimensional minimal clinically important differences in knee osteoarthritis after comprehensive rehabilitation: a prospective evaluation from the Bad Zurzach Osteoarthritis Study","volume":"4","author":"Angst","year":"2018","journal-title":"RMD open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1567","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546506288855","article-title":"Responsiveness of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form","volume":"34","author":"Irrgang","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0058-1","article-title":"Measurement properties of the German version of the IKDC subjective knee form (IKDC-SKF)","volume":"2","author":"Kummel","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib45","article-title":"The minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit in the patient-reported outcome measures of patients undergoing osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee","volume":"22","author":"Ogura","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cartilage"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1111\/sms.12861","article-title":"Translation and testing of measurement properties of the Swedish version of the IKDC subjective knee form","volume":"27","author":"Grevnerts","year":"2017","journal-title":"Scand J Med Sci Sports"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1177\/2325967118S00137","article-title":"Preoperative outcome scores are predictive of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after treatment of focal cartilage defects of the knee with Osteochondral grafts","volume":"6","author":"Wang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Orthop J Sports Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-017-0814-6","article-title":"Comparing the Chinese versions of two knee-specific questionnaires (IKDC and KOOS): reliability, validity, and responsiveness","volume":"15","author":"Huang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.3109\/09638288.2014.962107","article-title":"Responsiveness and minimally important differences for selected Persian-version of outcome measures used in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome","volume":"37","author":"Negahban","year":"2015","journal-title":"Disabil Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20100229","article-title":"Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement","volume":"91","author":"Wang","year":"2011","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1136\/bjsports-2012-091163","article-title":"Responsiveness of the VISA-P scale for patellar tendinopathy in athletes","volume":"48","author":"Hernandez-Sanchez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Sports Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546518759543","article-title":"Meaningful change scores in the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction","volume":"46","author":"Ingelsrud","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0b013e31829f19d8","article-title":"Responsiveness and minimal important changes for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in subjects undergoing rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty","volume":"92","author":"Monticone","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib54","first-page":"1","article-title":"Responsiveness of a Persian version of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Tegner activity scale in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction following physiotherapy treatment","volume":"23","author":"Mostafaee","year":"2018","journal-title":"Physiother Theory Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100716688724","article-title":"Minimal clinically important differences for American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score in hallux valgus surgery","volume":"38","author":"Chan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"918","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2007.02.003","article-title":"Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus","volume":"15","author":"Dawson","year":"2007","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"968","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070502601113","article-title":"Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM)","volume":"26","author":"Martin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100718800304","article-title":"PROMIS and FAAM minimal clinically important differences in foot and ankle orthopedics","volume":"40","author":"Hung","year":"2019","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib59","first-page":"639","article-title":"The minimum clinically important difference on the visa-a and lefs for patients with insertional achilles tendinopathy","volume":"10","author":"McCormack","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Sports Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-015-3941-9","article-title":"Evaluation of the Dutch version of the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS): responsiveness and minimally important change","volume":"24","author":"Sierevelt","year":"2016","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1586\/erp.11.9","article-title":"A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods","volume":"11","author":"King","year":"2011","journal-title":"Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.4065\/77.4.371","article-title":"Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures","volume":"77","author":"Guyatt","year":"2002","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2107","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdq726","article-title":"Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients","volume":"22","author":"Maringwa","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(97)90194-7","article-title":"Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty","volume":"12","author":"Mancuso","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2014.5248","article-title":"Minimum important differences for the patient-specific functional scale, 4 region-specific outcome measures, and the numeric pain rating scale","volume":"44","author":"Abbott","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Orthop Sports Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib66","first-page":"371","article-title":"The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic rehabilitation research network","volume":"79","author":"Binkley","year":"1999","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.01.008","article-title":"Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods","volume":"7","author":"Copay","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine J"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0895435618309387?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0895435618309387?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,12]],"date-time":"2025-10-12T05:15:47Z","timestamp":1760246147000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0895435618309387"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"references-count":67,"alternative-id":["S0895435618309387"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017","relation":{},"ISSN":["0895-4356"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0895-4356","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}