{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T23:30:47Z","timestamp":1789601447690,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,1]],"date-time":"2007-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1170288000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.10.039","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,3]],"date-time":"2007-02-03T07:46:33Z","timestamp":1170488793000},"page":"301-304","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Suture-related complications after congenital cataract surgery: Vicryl versus Mersilene sutures"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Shai M.","family":"Bar-Sela","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oriel","family":"Spierer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abraham","family":"Spierer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1994.70","article-title":"Corneal sutures: is routine removal really necessary?","volume":"8","author":"Danjoux","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"R2-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1991.20","article-title":"Ocular morbidity due to monofilament nylon corneal sutures.","volume":"5","author":"Acheson","year":"1991","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"R3-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(83)90274-X","article-title":"Complications of exposed monofilament sutures.","volume":"95","author":"Nirankari","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R4-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.75.11.663","article-title":"Should nylon corneal sutures be routinely removed?","volume":"75","author":"Jackson","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R5-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1994.167","article-title":"In situ degradation of 110 polyester (Mersilene) suture material following cataract surgery.","volume":"8","author":"King","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"R6-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1996.128","article-title":"Do Mersilene sutures need to be removed after cataract surgery?","volume":"10","author":"Hollick","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"R7-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1998.94","article-title":"A prospective controlled study of a 100 absorbable polyglactin suture for corneal incision phacoemulsification.","volume":"12","author":"Bainbridge","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"R8-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80827-9","article-title":"Natural history of corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery.","volume":"17","author":"Talamo","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R9-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1993.30","article-title":"Timing of removal of sutures in control of post-operative astigmatism.","volume":"7","author":"Stanford","year":"1993","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"R10-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.122.5.695","article-title":"Changes in astigmatism after congenital cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation; a comparative study.","volume":"122","author":"Spierer","year":"2004","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R11-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(14)74861-5","article-title":"Cycloplegic refractions in infants and young children.","volume":"90","author":"Fulton","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R12-38-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)00020-6","article-title":"Bacterial endophthalmitis after suture removal.","volume":"25","author":"Culbert","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0886335006014593?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0886335006014593?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.10.039","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,13]],"date-time":"2021-05-13T16:34:06Z","timestamp":1620923646000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/02158034-200702000-00038"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,2]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.10.039","relation":{},"ISSN":["0886-3350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0886-3350","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,2]]}}}