{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,31]],"date-time":"2026-10-31T00:42:09Z","timestamp":1793407329998,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559347200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["jcrsjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,20]],"date-time":"2019-03-20T02:04:25Z","timestamp":1553047465000},"page":"778-788","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":61,"title":["Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Robert","family":"Herber","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisa","family":"Ramm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eberhard","family":"Spoerl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frederik","family":"Raiskup","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lutz E.","family":"Pillunat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Naim","family":"Terai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R2-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1465","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2014-305120","article-title":"Early diagnosis of keratoconus: What difference is it making?","volume":"98","author":"Fernandez Perez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R3-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.07.021","article-title":"New perspectives on the detection and progression of keratoconus.","volume":"43","author":"Martinez-Abad","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R4-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2017-310355","article-title":"Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.","volume":"102","author":"Chan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R5-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1948","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.09-4177","article-title":"Corneal biomechanics, refraction, and corneal aberrometry in keratoconus: an integrated study.","volume":"51","author":"Pinero","year":"2010","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R6-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.06.029","article-title":"Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: Curve analysis.","volume":"37","author":"Touboul","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R7-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20120103-03","article-title":"Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.","volume":"28","author":"Galletti","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R8-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20161221-03","article-title":"Introduction of two novel stiffness parameters and interpretation of air puff-induced biomechanical deformation parameters with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.","volume":"33","author":"Roberts","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R9-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3651","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.13-13715","article-title":"Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact Scheimpflug-based tonometer.","volume":"55","author":"Ali","year":"2014","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R10-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.3109\/02713681003678824","article-title":"Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements.","volume":"35","author":"Gaton","year":"2010","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res"},{"key":"R11-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.3109\/02713683.2012.669007","article-title":"Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer.","volume":"37","author":"Terai","year":"2012","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res"},{"key":"R12-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.07.058","article-title":"Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Reichert ocular response analyzer.","volume":"142","author":"Kirwan","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R13-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e258","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.12056","article-title":"Biomechanical diagnosis of keratoconus: evaluation of the keratoconus match index and the keratoconus match probability.","volume":"91","author":"Labiris","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R14-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20130129-03","article-title":"Scheimpflug-based tomography and biomechanical assessment in pressure-induced stromal keratopathy.","volume":"29","author":"Faria-Correia","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R15-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-10984","article-title":"A new tonometerthe Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.","volume":"54","author":"Hong","year":"2013","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R16-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.16-21045","article-title":"Factors associated with corneal deformation responses measured with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.","volume":"58","author":"Miki","year":"2017","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R17-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20160629-01","article-title":"Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index.","volume":"32","author":"Vinciguerra","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R18-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2015.1077515","article-title":"Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry.","volume":"19","author":"Joda","year":"2016","journal-title":"Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin"},{"key":"R19-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20160524-01","article-title":"Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients.","volume":"32","author":"Vinciguerra","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R20-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000000293","article-title":"Repeatability, reproducibility, and age dependency of dynamic Scheimpflug-based pneumotonometer and its correlation with a dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry device.","volume":"34","author":"Bak-Nielsen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"R21-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.2147\/CLEP.S30816","article-title":"Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology.","volume":"4","author":"Niven","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"R22-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.2307\/2531595","article-title":"Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.","volume":"44","author":"DeLong","year":"1988","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"R23-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2014.04.013","article-title":"Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments.","volume":"40","author":"Roberts","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R24-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.01.014","article-title":"Staging of keratoconus indices regarding tomography, topography, and biomechanical measurements.","volume":"159","author":"Goebels","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R25-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1025","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000001639","article-title":"Diagnostic ability of corneal shape and biomechanical parameters for detecting frank keratoconus.","volume":"37","author":"Sedaghat","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"R26-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2009.09.023","article-title":"Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.","volume":"117","author":"Fontes","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R27-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1590\/S0004-27492011000100003","article-title":"Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases.","volume":"74","author":"Fontes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arq Bras Oftalmol"},{"key":"R28-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20100415-02","article-title":"Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes.","volume":"27","author":"Fontes","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R29-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.09.013","article-title":"Discriminant value of custom ocular response analyzer waveform derivatives in keratoconus.","volume":"121","author":"Hallahan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R30-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2015.12.031","article-title":"Detection of subclinical keratoconus through non-contact tonometry and the use of discriminant biomechanical functions.","volume":"49","author":"Pena-Garcia","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Biomech"},{"key":"R31-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2013.12.024","article-title":"Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.","volume":"157","author":"Huseynova","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R32-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2010.12.001","article-title":"Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population.","volume":"118","author":"Narayanaswamy","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R33-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1590\/S0004-27492013000400008","article-title":"Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera.","volume":"76","author":"Valbon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arq Bras Oftalmol"},{"key":"R34-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.10.044","article-title":"Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.","volume":"31","author":"Luce","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R35-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20110106-01","article-title":"Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software.","volume":"27","author":"Spoerl","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R36-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2018.08.005","article-title":"Enhanced tomographic assessment to detect corneal ectasia based on artificial intelligence.","volume":"195","author":"Lopes","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R37-11-20210210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20170426-02","article-title":"Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection.","volume":"33","author":"Ambrosio","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0886335018310198?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0886335018310198?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.015","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]],"date-time":"2023-09-14T17:36:12Z","timestamp":1694712972000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/02158034-201906000-00011"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.015","relation":{},"ISSN":["0886-3350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0886-3350","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.015","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}