{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T02:40:08Z","timestamp":1785465608211,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,1]],"date-time":"2016-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1462060800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,1]],"date-time":"2016-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1462060800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"College of Medicine Research Center"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,20]],"date-time":"2016-02-20T21:45:40Z","timestamp":1456004740000},"page":"8-11","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Lateefa O.","family":"AlDakhil","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000202400.13898.8b","article-title":"Professional liability payments in obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"107","author":"Barbieri","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000158864.09443.77","article-title":"Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"105","author":"White","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.043","article-title":"The effects of medical liability on obstetric care supply in Michigan","volume":"198","author":"Xu","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa1012370","article-title":"Malpractice risk according to physician specialty","volume":"365","author":"Jena","year":"2011","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib5","unstructured":"Wilson N, Strunk AL. Overview of the 2012 ACOG Survey on Professional Liability. [Online] [accessed 12.10.14]. Available from:https:\/\/m.acog.org\/-\/media\/Departments\/Professional-Liability\/2012PLSurveyNational.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31818475de","article-title":"Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"47","author":"Yang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib7","first-page":"710","article-title":"An analysis of closed obstetric malpractice claims","volume":"74","author":"Rosenblatt","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.021","article-title":"Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation","volume":"200","author":"Fuglenes","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2609","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.293.21.2609","article-title":"Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment","volume":"293","author":"Studdert","year":"2005","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib10","unstructured":"Klagholz J, Strunk AL. Overview of the 2012 ACOG survey on professional liability. [Online] [accessed 01.10.15]. Available from: https:\/\/m.acog.org\/-\/media\/Departments\/Professional-Liability\/2012PLSurveyNational.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.04.019","article-title":"Legal issues impacting women's access to care in the United States\u2013the malpractice insurance crisis","volume":"94","author":"Hale","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2007.03.011","article-title":"Medical negligence lawsuits relating to labor and delivery","volume":"34","author":"Cohen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818da2c7","article-title":"Reducing obstetric litigation through alterations in practice patterns","volume":"112","author":"Clark","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.031","article-title":"Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety","volume":"199","author":"Clark","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib15","first-page":"751","article-title":"Reduced medicolegal risk by compliance with obstetric clinical pathways: a case-control study","volume":"101","author":"Ransom","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.325.7370.961","article-title":"Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres","volume":"325","author":"Wennberg","year":"2002","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib17","series-title":"Full house: the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin","author":"Gould","year":"1996"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.026","article-title":"Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes","volume":"197","author":"Clark","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.5144\/0256-4947.2006.87","article-title":"Status of medical liability claims in Saudi Arabia","volume":"26","author":"Samarkandi","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ann Saudi Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1382","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000220531.25707.27","article-title":"Obstetric litigation is asphyxiating our maternity services","volume":"107","author":"Hankins","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib21","series-title":"Variation in asbestos litigation compensation and expenses (RAND report)","author":"Kakalik","year":"1984"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(96)02631-0","article-title":"High-risk obstetrics, medicolegal problems","volume":"71","author":"Herczeg","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2010.12.002","article-title":"Obstetric malpractice litigation and cerebral palsy in term infants","volume":"8","author":"Johnson","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Forensic Leg Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90082-3","article-title":"Analysis of 500 obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims: causes and prevention","volume":"165","author":"Ward","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2012.12.006","article-title":"Analysis of obstetrics and gynecology professional liability claims in Catalonia, Spain (1986\u20132010)","volume":"20","author":"G\u00f3mez-Dur\u00e1n","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Forensic Leg Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000144127.78481.8c","article-title":"Disability and litigation from urinary tract injuries at benign gynecologic surgery in Canada","volume":"105","author":"Gilmour","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib27","series-title":"Vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean birth. ACOG Committee Opinion 143","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"1994"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"945","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90032-E","article-title":"Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences","volume":"169","author":"Leung","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.005","article-title":"VBAC: a medicolegal perspective","volume":"38","author":"Bonanno","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000287294.89148.23","article-title":"Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates","volume":"110","author":"Murthy","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001_bib31","series-title":"Medical liability climate hurts patients and ob-gyns Survey reveals continuing trend","author":"American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2012"}],"container-title":["Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1752928X16000457?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1752928X16000457?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T00:09:55Z","timestamp":1761696595000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1752928X16000457"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"references-count":31,"alternative-id":["S1752928X16000457"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1752-928X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1752-928X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jflm.2016.02.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}