{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T23:48:06Z","timestamp":1787874486945,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,3]],"date-time":"2018-11-03T05:44:59Z","timestamp":1541223899000},"page":"34-39","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Review of a forensic pseudoscience: Identification of criminals from bitemark patterns"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"61","author":[{"given":"C. Michael","family":"Bowers","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_sref1","series-title":"FBI Admits Flaws in Hair Analysis over Decades, Wash. Post","author":"Hsu","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib2","unstructured":"In the Last Decade, Scientific and Legal Communities outside the Sphere of Forensic Groups Have Thoroughly Investigated the Application of Bitemark Analysis (Also Known as Bitemark \u201cidentification\u201d). Their Comments Form a Substantial Portion of This Paper's Reasoning Due the Lack of Scientific Balance and Scientific Clarity in the Peer-reviewed Bitemark Literature."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1520\/JFS14120J","article-title":"An improved method to recover saliva from human skin. The double swab technique","volume":"42","author":"Sweet","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Forensic Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib4","series-title":"Forensic Dentistry","first-page":"269","article-title":"Bite mark citations","author":"Pitluck","year":"1997"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_sref5","first-page":"261","article-title":"A new method for the identification of teeth marks in cases of assaults and homicide","volume":"1214","author":"Furness","year":"1968","journal-title":"Br Dent J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib5a","first-page":"17","article-title":"The case for better bite and bite mark preservations","volume":"4","author":"Sognnaes","year":"1977","journal-title":"Int J Forensic Dent"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1520\/JFS10538J","article-title":"Unusual three-dimensional bite mark evidence in a homicide case","volume":"21","author":"Vale","year":"1976","journal-title":"J Forensic Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib7","series-title":"Slone, 76 Cal. App. 3d 611, 143 Cal. Rptr. 61","author":"People","year":"1978"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib8","series-title":"Proceedings of the American Academy of Sciences, San Francisco","first-page":"132","article-title":"If your chewing gum lose its flavor, don't spit it out at a murder scene [abstr F32]","author":"Asen","year":"1998"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_sref9","unstructured":"(See variously)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib9a","first-page":"118","article-title":"Statistical Evidence for the similarity of the human dentition","volume":"56","author":"Bush","year":"2011","journal-title":"J For Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib9b","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sheets HD et al. Dental Shape Match Rates in Selected and Orthodontically Treated Populations in New York State: A Two Dimensional Study, 56J.F.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1556-4029.2011.01731.x"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib9c","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1556-4029.2010.01531.x","article-title":"Statistical Evidence for the similarity of the human dentition","volume":"56","author":"Bush","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Forensic Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib9d","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1556-4029.2011.01731.x","article-title":"Dental shape match rates in selected and orthodontically treated populations in New York state: a two dimensional study","volume":"56","author":"Sheets","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Forensic Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib9e","article-title":"Similarity and match rates of the human dentition in three dimensions: relevance to bitemark analysis.125","volume":"799","author":"Bush","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int'l J Leg Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib10","first-page":"166","article-title":"Some laboratory studies on the accuracy of bite comparison","volume":"25","author":"Whittaker","year":"1975","journal-title":"Int Dent J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib11","series-title":"Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony","first-page":"538","article-title":"Identification from bitemarks","author":"Faigman","year":"2017"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1097\/PAF.0000000000000392","article-title":"Epidermis and enamel, insights into published gnawing criticisms of human bitemark evidence","volume":"39","author":"Barsley","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Forensic Med Pathol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1520\/JFS11656J","article-title":"Statistical evidence for the individuality of the human dentition","volume":"29","author":"Rawson","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Forensic Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgp016","article-title":"Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: the new epistemology of forensic identification","volume":"8 L","author":"Cole","year":"2009","journal-title":"Probability & Risk"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib15","unstructured":"Robert Lee Stinson was Exonerated in 2009 after 23 Years in Prison. State v. Stinson, 134 Wis.2d 224, 228, n. 2, 397 N.W.2d 136, vol. 137, n. 2 (1986). https:\/\/www.innocenceproject.org\/cases\/robert-lee-stinson\/Accessed date: 15 August 2018. A number of US state courts still use his original conviction as legal precedents for the acceptance of bitemark testimony. One example of this is Alabama vs. Handley, which uses Stinson as legal precedence for acceptance. https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/alabama\/court-of-appeals-criminal\/1987\/515-so-2d-121-0.html Accessed date: 19 August 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_sref16","series-title":"Bitemark Identification Evidence in Canada","author":"Chin","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib17","unstructured":"The US Legal System Possesses Two Methods of Expert Evidence. Legal Thresholds for \u201cscientific\u201d Acceptance Are Contained in the Frye and Daubert Appellate Opinions. Both Claim a Cohort of Practitioners \u201cgenerally Accepting\u201d Their Own Hypotheses as Evidence of Acceptability. Daubert Also Possesses 4 Other Factors. By Inference, Palm Reading and Astrology Also Fall within This Scope of Legal Acceptability. Federal Rule 702 Overlays These with the \u201cgatekeeping\u201d Judge Determining that \u201cscientific Knowledge\u201d Exists for Expert Testimony."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1093\/jlb\/lsw045","volume":"3","author":"Saks","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Law Biosci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib19","unstructured":"The highly qualified wording of this 2016 ABFO bitemark document removes the possibility of linking a particular suspect to a bitemark bruise. http:\/\/abfo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ABFO-Bitemark-Standards-03162016.pdf Accessed date: 6 August 2018."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1520\/JFS12045J","article-title":"Analysis of salivary DNA evidence from a bite mark on a body submerged in water","volume":"44","author":"Sweet","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Forensic Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib21","unstructured":"The Innocence Network. http:\/\/innocencenetwork.org\/Accessed date: 19 August 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib22","series-title":"New Jersey v Fortin 2007","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib23","series-title":"Problem-based Analysis of Bitemark Misidentifications: The Role of DNA","author":"Bowers","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib24","unstructured":"Whittaker DK. Supra, Note 10."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib25","unstructured":"Faigman D, Saks MJ, et al. Modern Scientific Evidence. (Chapter 34) on \u201cForensic Odontology.\u201d."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1520\/JFS15160J","article-title":"Digital bitemark overlays - an analysis of effectiveness","volume":"46","author":"Pretty","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Forensic Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib27","unstructured":"Innocence Project: Description of Bitemark Exonerations. https:\/\/www.innocenceproject.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Description-of-bite-mark-exonerations-and-statistical-analysis_final.pdf. Accessed date: 9 August 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib28","unstructured":"The American Board of Forensic Odontology is recognized as a forensic certification agency for forensic dentistry by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. This forensic dental board averages 100 members. www.abfo.org."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib29","unstructured":"Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community National Research Council. http:\/\/www.nasonline.org findings occur on pages 173-176.Accessed date: 7 August 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib30","unstructured":"Id."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib31","unstructured":"Id."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib32","unstructured":"Id."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib33","unstructured":"Id."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib34","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib35","unstructured":"\u201cAgreed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Applicant's Subsequent Writ of Habeas Corpus\u201d WRIT No. W87-95754-k(A). Criminal District Court No, 4 Dallas County, Texas."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib36","unstructured":"Id, Item 1. Page 4."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib37","unstructured":"Id, Item 5. Page 5."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib38","unstructured":"The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_President%27s_Council_of_Advisors_on_Science_and_Technology Accessed date: 7 August 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib39","unstructured":"President\u2019s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Forensic in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods. Accessed date: 7 August 2018.https:\/\/obamawhitehouse.archives.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/microsites\/ostp\/PCAST\/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib40","unstructured":"Balko, Radley. California's Senate Has Approved an Important New Forensics Bill. https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-watch\/wp\/2014\/04\/11\/californias-senate-has-approved-an-important-new-forensics-bill\/?utm_term=.25637cd30915."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib41","unstructured":"PCAST, Supra Note 39. Pages 83 to 90."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib42","unstructured":"Id."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib43","unstructured":"Id."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib44","unstructured":"Freeman A, Pretty IA \u201cConstruct Validity of Bitemark Assessments Using the ABFO Decision Tree,\u201d Presentation at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. See: online.wsj.com\/public\/resources\/documents\/ConstructValidBMdecisiontreePRETTYFREEMAN.pdf. (The link in PCAST sends you to their AAFS presentation slides)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib45","series-title":"A Bite Mark Matching Advocacy Group Just Conducted a Study that Discredits Bite Mark Evidence, Washington Post","author":"Balko","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001_bib46","unstructured":"Saks, supra note at 18. This article was modified from \u201cAmici Brief\u201d of Michael Saks, Thomas Albright, Thomas L. Bohan, Barbara E. Bierer, C. Michael Bowers and 33 Other Scientists, Statisticians and Law-and-Science Scholars and Practitioners In Support of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by William Joseph Richards. https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jlb\/article\/3\/3\/538\/2544494. Accessed date: 15 August 2018."}],"container-title":["Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1752928X18305080?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1752928X18305080?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T00:12:45Z","timestamp":1761696765000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1752928X18305080"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"references-count":52,"alternative-id":["S1752928X18305080"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1752-928X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1752-928X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Review of a forensic pseudoscience: Identification of criminals from bitemark patterns","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jflm.2018.11.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}