{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,7]],"date-time":"2025-10-07T01:12:03Z","timestamp":1759799523080,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,1]],"date-time":"2024-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1711929600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,1]],"date-time":"2024-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1711929600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,26]],"date-time":"2024-02-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1708905600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Food Protection"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,28]],"date-time":"2024-02-28T11:35:51Z","timestamp":1709120151000},"page":"100258","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of Three Preharvest Sampling Strategies to Monitor Pathogens in Cattle Lairage Areas"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"87","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-8188-1595","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Makenzie G.","family":"Flach","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7389-3263","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Onay B.","family":"Dogan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mark F.","family":"Miller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marcos X.","family":"Sanchez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8016-6769","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mindy M.","family":"Brashears","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.meatsci.2010.04.019","article-title":"Super shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by cattle and impact on beef carcass contamination","volume":"86","author":"Arthur","year":"2010","journal-title":"Meat Science"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1089\/fpd.2016.2189","article-title":"Evaluation of bacteriophage application to cattle in lairage at beef processing plants to reduce Escherichia coli O157:H7 prevalence on hides and carcasses","volume":"2017","author":"Arthur","year":"2017","journal-title":"Foodborne Pathogens and Disease"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1017\/S0950268814000521","article-title":"Risk factors for Escherichia coli O157 on beef cattle ranches located near a major produce production region","volume":"143","author":"Benjamin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Epidemiology and Infection"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0020","first-page":"2","article-title":"Lactic acid bacteria and their uses in animal feeding to improve food safety","volume":"50","author":"Brashears","year":"2005","journal-title":"Advances in Food and Nutrition Research"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.meatsci.2017.03.015","article-title":"The diversity of beef safety: A global reason to strengthen our current systems","volume":"132","author":"Brashears","year":"2017","journal-title":"Meat Science"},{"year":"2021","series-title":"Mitigation strategies for Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, and antimicrobial resistance throughout the beef production chain","author":"Casas","key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0030"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0035","unstructured":"Cattlemen\u2019s Beef Board. (2018). 2017 Cattlemen\u2019s Stewardship Review. Retrieved March 12, 2023, from https:\/\/www.beefitswhatsfordinner.com\/Media\/BIWFD\/Docs\/beef-csr-report-2017-final.pdf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0040","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E. coli (Escherichia coli) questions and answers. Retrieved March, 12 2023, from https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/ecoli\/general\/index.html"},{"year":"2015","series-title":"Chapter 3: Summer and winter prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157 in feces of Feedlot cattle","author":"Dewsbury","key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0045"},{"year":"2004","series-title":"Survival and distribution of Escherichia coli O157 in bovine manure","author":"Echeverry","key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0050"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/jas\/skaa040","article-title":"Animal welfare in the U.S. slaughter industry \u2013 A focus on fed cattle","volume":"98","author":"Edwards-Callaway","year":"2020","journal-title":"Journal of Animal Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0060","unstructured":"Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA. (2020). Ante-mortem livestock inspection-revision 3. Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https:\/\/www.fsis.usda.gov\/policy\/fsis-directives\/6100.1"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0065","unstructured":"Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA. Component 1: requiring incoming flocks be tested for Salmonella before entering an establishment. (2022). Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https:\/\/www.fsis.usda.gov\/inspection\/inspection-programs\/inspection-poultry-products\/reducing-salmonella-poultry\/proposed-0"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0070","unstructured":"Fremonta. MicroTally\u2122 for beef. Retrieved March 14, 2023, from https:\/\/www.fremonta.com\/beef-sampling"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0075","unstructured":"Hygiena. (n.d. a). BAX\u00ae system real-time PCR assay Salmonella. Retrieved February 5, 2024, from https:\/\/www.hygiena.com\/documents\/63061\/bax-system-q7-real-time-pcr-assay-salmonella-instructions-en.pdf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0080","unstructured":"Hygiena. (n.d. b). BAX\u00ae system real-time PCR assay E. coli O157:H7 exact. Retrieved February 5, 2024, from https:\/\/www.hygiena.com\/documents\/64141\/bax-system-q7-assay-e-coli-real-time-exact-instructions-en.pdf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.meatsci.2007.04.004","article-title":"Interventions to reduce\/eliminate Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef","volume":"77","author":"Koohmaraie","year":"2007","journal-title":"Meat Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetmic.2014.06.008","article-title":"Transmission of ESBL\/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli from broiler chicken farms to surrounding areas","volume":"172","author":"Laube","year":"2014","journal-title":"Veterinary Microbiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.3390\/agriculture12010057","article-title":"Boot swabs to evaluate cleaning and disinfection success in poultry barns","volume":"12","author":"Mateus-Vargas","year":"2022","journal-title":"Agriculture"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1863-2378.2007.01059.x","article-title":"Pre-harvest interventions to reduce the shedding of E. coli O157 in the faeces of weaned domestic ruminants: A systematic review","volume":"54","author":"Sargent","year":"2007","journal-title":"Zoonoses Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1111\/zph.12468","article-title":"Cross-sectional study to estimate the prevalence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli on the hides of market beef cows at harvest","volume":"65","author":"Schneider","year":"2018","journal-title":"Zoonoses and Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2672.1999.00715.x","article-title":"Evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks","volume":"86","author":"Skov","year":"1999","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Microbiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2386","DOI":"10.4315\/0362-028X-70.10.2386","article-title":"Reduction of Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella in feces and on hides of feedlot cattle using various doses of a direct-fed microbial","volume":"70","author":"Stephens","year":"2007","journal-title":"Journal of Food Protection"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0120","unstructured":"U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (2022). Cattle & beef sector at a glance. Retrieved March 12, 2023, from https:\/\/www.ers.usda.gov\/topics\/animal-products\/cattle-beef\/sector-at-a-glance\/"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0125","first-page":"332","article-title":"The prevalence of verotoxin, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Salmonella in the feces and rumen of cattle at processing","volume":"40","author":"Van Donkersgoed","year":"1999","journal-title":"The Canadian Veterinary Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1111\/zph.12187","article-title":"Reduced burden on Salmonella enterica in bovine subiliac lymph nodes associated with administration of direct-fed microbial","volume":"62","author":"Vipham","year":"2015","journal-title":"Zoonoses and Public Health"}],"container-title":["Journal of Food Protection"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0362028X24000425?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0362028X24000425?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,6]],"date-time":"2025-10-06T22:35:56Z","timestamp":1759790156000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0362028X24000425"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0362028X24000425"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258","relation":{},"ISSN":["0362-028X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0362-028X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparison of Three Preharvest Sampling Strategies to Monitor Pathogens in Cattle Lairage Areas","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Food Protection","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jfp.2024.100258","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Association for Food Protection.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100258"}}