{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T10:08:53Z","timestamp":1791281333042,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,1]],"date-time":"2012-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1328054400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,22]],"date-time":"2011-10-22T21:58:29Z","timestamp":1319320709000},"page":"62-68","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["De l\u2019impact des RPC pour r\u00e9duire le taux d\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"D.","family":"Reinbold","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"\u00c9boue","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Morello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Lamendour","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Herlicoviez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Dreyfus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0005","unstructured":"Recommandations pour la pratique clinique\u00a0: l\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2006; 35;1S1\u201380."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1S68","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(06)76500-0","article-title":"Peut-on r\u00e9duire le taux d\u2019\u00e9pisiotomies\u00a0?","volume":"35","author":"Faruel-Fosse","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2009.09.013","article-title":"\u00c9valuation d\u2019une politique restrictive d\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie avant et apr\u00e8s les recommandations du Coll\u00e8ge national des gyn\u00e9cologues obst\u00e9triciens fran\u00e7ais","volume":"39","author":"Eckman","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1202","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2008.08.011","article-title":"R\u00e9seau sentinelle Audipog 2004\u20132005. Partie 2\u00a0: \u00e9valuation des pratiques professionnelles","volume":"36","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0030","volume":"vol. 48, No. 14","author":"Curtin","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1997.tb00578.x","article-title":"Episiotomy counts: trends and prevalence in Canada, 1981\/1982\u00a0to 1993\/1994","volume":"24","author":"Graham","year":"1997","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.093","article-title":"Evidence based labor and delivery management","volume":"199","author":"Berghella","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0040","first-page":"769","article-title":"Physicians beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care","volume":"153","author":"Klein","year":"1995","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1468","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.282.15.1458","article-title":"Why don\u2019t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement","volume":"282","author":"Cabana","year":"1999","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.03.004","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland","volume":"136","author":"Macleod","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.04.006","article-title":"Episiotomy: beliefs, practice and the impact of educational intervention","volume":"123","author":"Lowenstein","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340903002857","article-title":"Audit and feedback: effects on professional obstetrical practice and healthcare outcomes in a university hospital","volume":"88","author":"Costa","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2009.06.003","article-title":"Impact maternel et n\u00e9onatal des recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF relatives \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie. \u00c9tude unicentrique \u00e0 propos de 5409\u00a0accouchements par voie vaginale","volume":"37","author":"Koskas","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0070","first-page":"275","article-title":"Reducing the frequency of episiotomies through a continuous quality improvement program","volume":"153","author":"Reynolds","year":"1995","journal-title":"Can Med Assoc J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0075","first-page":"CD000259","article-title":"Audit and feedback: effects on professionnal practice and health care outcomes","author":"Jamtvedt","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0080","first-page":"803","article-title":"Episiotomy practice in a community hospital setting","volume":"53","author":"Gosset","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"945","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7343.945","article-title":"Episiotomy rates in primipares women in Latin America: hopsital based descriptive study","volume":"324","author":"Althabe","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/0091-2182(96)00016-X","article-title":"Practices styles. A comparison of obstetricians and nurse-midwives","volume":"41","author":"Fullerton","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Nurse Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00868-1","article-title":"Predictors of episiotomy use at first spontaneous vaginal delivery","volume":"96","author":"Robinson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S244","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(08)74762-8","article-title":"Complications maternelles des extractions instrumentales","volume":"37","author":"Beucher","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7456.24","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis","volume":"329","author":"Demissie","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1325","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70049-2","article-title":"A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-Cup vacuum extractor","volume":"175","author":"Bofill","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1688","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x","article-title":"A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery","volume":"115","author":"Macleod","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"668e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.002","article-title":"Reducing high-order perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery","volume":"198","author":"Hirsch","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1S32","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(06)76496-1","article-title":"Pratique lib\u00e9rale versus restrictive de l\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie\u00a0: existe-t-il des indications obst\u00e9tricales sp\u00e9cifiques de l\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie\u00a0?","volume":"35","author":"Riethmuller","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0130","first-page":"CD000081","article-title":"Episiotomy for vaginal birth","volume":"2","author":"Carroli","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.309.6964.1255","article-title":"Methods and consequences in use of episiotomy","volume":"309","author":"Henriksen","year":"1994","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1929","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa071456","article-title":"A behavorial intervention to improve obstetrical care","volume":"358","author":"Althabe","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.303.6799.398","article-title":"Effects of feedback on information on clinical practice: a review","volume":"303","author":"Mugford","year":"1991","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231511002146?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231511002146?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,29]],"date-time":"2018-11-29T07:25:59Z","timestamp":1543476359000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231511002146"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231511002146"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]}}}