{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T12:23:51Z","timestamp":1763036631921},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,7]],"date-time":"2011-11-07T23:58:43Z","timestamp":1320710323000},"page":"734-746","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Grossesses prolong\u00e9es (termes d\u00e9pass\u00e9s)\u00a0: \u00e0 partir de quand doit-on surveiller et \u00e0 quelle fr\u00e9quence\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"J.-B.","family":"Haumont\u00e9","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"d\u2019Ercole","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vorherr H. Placental insufficiency in relation to postterm pregnancy and fetal postmaturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;123:63.","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(75)90951-5"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0010","unstructured":"National institute for clinical excellence. Induction of Labour. London: NICE; 2008."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0015","unstructured":"Haute Autorit\u00e9 de sant\u00e9 (HAS). Recommandations professionnelles. D\u00e9clenchement artificiel du travail \u00e0 partir de 37\u00a0semaines d\u2019am\u00e9norrh\u00e9e\u00a0; 2008."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0020","first-page":"639","article-title":"Management of postterm pregnancy","volume":"3","author":"ACOG Practice bulletin 55","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32945-0","article-title":"Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0\u00a0to 42+0\u00a0weeks","volume":"30","author":"Delaney","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2010.057","article-title":"Guidelines for the management of postterm pregnancy","volume":"38","author":"Mandruzzato","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.006","article-title":"\u00c9pid\u00e9miologie de la grossesse prolong\u00e9e\u00a0: pr\u00e9valence et morbidit\u00e9 maternelle","author":"Chantry","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0040","first-page":"547","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth","volume":"79","author":"Feldman","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10047.x","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality","volume":"105","author":"Hilder","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.446","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978\u20131993","volume":"189","author":"Olesen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709024606","article-title":"Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76,761\u00a0postterm pregnancies in Sweden, 1982\u20131991: a register study","volume":"76","author":"Ingemarsson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000227783.65800.0f","article-title":"Outcomes of pregnancy beyond 37\u00a0weeks of gestation","volume":"108","author":"Heimstad","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211560","article-title":"Maternal complications of pregnancy increase beyond 40\u00a0weeks of gestation in low-risk women","volume":"26","author":"Caughey","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.11.1.50.53","article-title":"Post term pregnancy: should induction of labor be considered after 42\u00a0weeks?","volume":"11","author":"Treger","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.319.7205.287","article-title":"Prospective risk of unexplained stillbirth in singleton pregnancies at term: population based analysis","volume":"319","author":"Cotzias","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00862-0","article-title":"Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestation","volume":"96","author":"Alexander","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109735","article-title":"Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies","volume":"184","author":"Smith","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340500543733","article-title":"Pregnancy risk increases from 41\u00a0weeks of gestation","volume":"85","author":"Nakling","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01328.x","article-title":"Variation in rates of postterm birth in Europe: reality or artefact?","volume":"114","author":"Zeitlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(06)76409-2","article-title":"La sant\u00e9 p\u00e9rinatale en France m\u00e9tropolitaine de 1995\u00a0\u00e0 2003. R\u00e9sultats des enqu\u00eates nationales p\u00e9rinatales","volume":"35","author":"Blondel","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90240-8","article-title":"Postdate fetal surveillance: is 41\u00a0weeks too early?","volume":"161","author":"Guidetti","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80005-X","article-title":"The efficacy of staring postterm antenatal testing at 41\u00a0weeks as compared with 42\u00a0weeks of gestional age","volume":"159","author":"Bauchner","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70269-1","article-title":"A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy","volume":"170","author":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0125","first-page":"101","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: procedure guidelines","volume":"40","author":"Ocon","year":"1997","journal-title":"Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecologia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)00179-3","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome beyond 41\u00a0weeks gestation","volume":"59","author":"Roach","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakravarti S, Goenka B. Conservative policy of induction of labor in uncomplicated postdated pregnancies. XVI FIGO World Congress of Obstetrics & Gynecology; 2000\u00a0Sept 3\u20138; Washington DC, USA (Book 3) 2000:62.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)80498-1"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0140","first-page":"270","article-title":"Management of prolonged pregnancy: a randomized trial of induction of labour and antepartum foetal monitoring","volume":"14","author":"James","year":"2001","journal-title":"Natl Med J India"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0145","first-page":"1","article-title":"Postterm with favourable cervix: is induction necessary?","volume":"4367","author":"Chanrachakul","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41\u00a0weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42\u00a0weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores","volume":"120","author":"Gelisen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255665.77009.94","article-title":"Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy","volume":"109","author":"Heimstad","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0160","first-page":"S338","article-title":"Gestational diabetes","volume":"39","author":"Coll\u00e8ge national des gyn\u00e9cologues et obst\u00e9triciens fran\u00e7ais","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00387-7","article-title":"Outcomes of post-term births: the role of fetal growth restriction and malfor-mations","volume":"94","author":"Clausson","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00049-5","article-title":"Post-term births: risk factors and outcomes in a 10-year cohort of Norwegians births","volume":"89","author":"Campbell","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70482-X","article-title":"Fetal and neonatal mortality in the postterm pregnancy: the impact of gestational age and fetal growth restriction","volume":"178","author":"Divon","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39132.482025.80","article-title":"Racial variation in the association between gestational age and perinatal mortality: prospective study","volume":"334","author":"Balchin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01758-6","article-title":"Prenatal care and black-with fetal death disparity in the United States: heterogeneity by high-risk conditions","volume":"99","author":"Vintzileos","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.119639","article-title":"Parity and pregnancy outcomes","volume":"186","author":"Bai","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.080003235.x","article-title":"Maternal risk factors for cause-specific stillbirth and neonatal death","volume":"80","author":"Winbo","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00536-0","article-title":"Determinants of unexplained fetal deaths","volume":"95","author":"Huang","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13614.x","article-title":"Effects of maternal age, parity, and smoking on the risk of stillbirth","volume":"101","author":"Raymond","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.010","article-title":"Influence of parity on f\u0153tal mortality in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"132","author":"Hilder","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0215","first-page":"CD007863","article-title":"Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment","volume":"1","author":"Grivell","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90008-4","article-title":"A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitiring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results","volume":"143","author":"Freeman","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(79)90406-X","article-title":"Antepartum fetal heart testing. I. Evolution of the non-stress test","volume":"133","author":"Evertson","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0230","series-title":"Assessment and care of the fetus: physiologic, clinical and medicolegal principles","article-title":"The non stress test, in Eden RD","author":"Devoe","year":"1990"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)32583-2","article-title":"The non-stres test: an evaluation of 1000\u00a0patients","volume":"141","author":"Barrett","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0240","first-page":"1024","article-title":"Post-term pregnancy: fetal death rate with antepartum surveillance","volume":"79","author":"Grubb","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>3.0.CO;2-E","article-title":"Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion of seven methods","volume":"17","author":"Newcombe","year":"1998","journal-title":"Stat Med"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231511002523?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231511002523?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,19]],"date-time":"2019-06-19T01:54:38Z","timestamp":1560909278000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231511002523"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231511002523"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.015","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}}}