{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,27]],"date-time":"2026-03-27T11:38:31Z","timestamp":1774611511145,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":73,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,10]],"date-time":"2011-11-10T19:52:54Z","timestamp":1320954774000},"page":"785-795","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Place de l\u2019\u00e9valuation de la quantit\u00e9 de liquide amniotique, du score biophysique et du doppler dans la surveillance des grossesses prolong\u00e9es"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"M.-V.","family":"S\u00e9nat","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211122","article-title":"Dye-determined amniotic fluid volume and intrapartum\/neonatal outcome","volume":"24","author":"Magann","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0010","first-page":"44","article-title":"Standardized measurement of amniotic fluid volume by correlation of sonography with dye dilution technique","volume":"76","author":"Schiff","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1988.7.7.363","article-title":"Sonographic estimation of amniotic fluid volume. Subjective assessment versus pocket measurements","volume":"7","author":"Goldstein","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0020","first-page":"40","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume: methods and clinical accuracy","volume":"75","author":"Gramellini","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(84)90359-4","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome","volume":"150","author":"Chamberlain","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1330","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70015-3","article-title":"Antenatal testing among 1001\u00a0patients at high risk: the role of ultrasonographic estimate of amniotic fluid volume","volume":"180","author":"Magann","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00634-1","article-title":"Amniotic fluid volume estimation and the biophysical profile: a confusion of criteria","volume":"96","author":"Magann","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-3782(99)00043-2","article-title":"A comparison of three ultrasound estimates of intrapartum oligohydramnios for prediction of fetal hypoxia-reperfusion injury","volume":"56","author":"Rogers","year":"1999","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0045","first-page":"540","article-title":"Amniotic fluid volume assessment with the four-quadrant technique at 36-42\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"32","author":"Phelan","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70189-3","article-title":"Ultrasonographic assessment of amniotic fluid does not reflect actual amniotic fluid volume","volume":"177","author":"Chauhan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1533","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91734-R","article-title":"Measurement of amniotic fluid volume: accuracy of ultrasonography techniques","volume":"167","author":"Magann","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)80025-1","article-title":"Amniotic fluid volume assessment: comparison of ultrasonographic estimates versus direct measurements with a dye-dilution technique in human pregnancy","volume":"167","author":"Dildy","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1581","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107325","article-title":"The amniotic fluid index, single deepest pocket, and two-diameter pocket in normal human pregnancy","volume":"182","author":"Magann","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(03)00859-7","article-title":"How well do the amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket indices (below the 3rd and 5th and above the 95th and 97th percentiles) predict oligohydramnios and hydramnios?","volume":"190","author":"Magann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0004-8666.2003.00002.x","article-title":"Comparability of the amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket measurements in clinical practice","volume":"43","author":"Magann","year":"2003","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0080","first-page":"CD006593","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome","author":"Nabhan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11046.x","article-title":"A randomised comparison between amniotic fluid index and maximum pool depth in the monitoring of post-term pregnancy","volume":"104","author":"Alfirevic","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.078","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index vs single deepest pocket technique during modified biophysical profile: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"191","author":"Chauhan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 6","key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.10.437","article-title":"Biophysical profile with amniotic fluid volume assessment: a randomized controlled trial of the amniotic fluid index versus single deepest pocket","volume":"189","author":"Magann","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1564","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.046","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial of the intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume: amniotic fluid index versus the single deepest pocket technique","volume":"190","author":"Moses","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0105","first-page":"180","article-title":"A comparison between two different ultrasonographic methods for assessing amniotic fluid volume in post-term pregnancies [Post-term gebeliklerde amniyotik sivi hacminin degerlendirilmesinde iki farkli ultrasonografi yonteminin karsilastirimasi]","volume":"16","author":"Oral","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi Tip Dergisi"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.10.018","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"104","author":"Nabhan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70393-5","article-title":"Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: A meta-analysis","volume":"181","author":"Chauhan","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90103-5","article-title":"Longitudinal measurement of amniotic fluid index in post-term pregnancies and its association with fetal outcome","volume":"172","author":"Divon","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0125","first-page":"229","article-title":"Longitudinal study of the amniotic fluid index in post-dates pregnancy","volume":"79","author":"Marks","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610802431857","article-title":"The prediction of intra-partum fetal compromise in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"28","author":"Singh","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(93)90833-I","article-title":"Amniotic fluid volume as a predictor of fetal distress in post-term pregnancy","volume":"40","author":"Tongsong","year":"1993","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00121.x","article-title":"Fetal arterial and venous doppler parameters in the interpretation of oligohydramnios in post-term pregnancies","volume":"15","author":"Selam","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90020-J","article-title":"Fetal renal pulsed doppler waveform in prolonged pregnancies","volume":"169","author":"Veille","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0150","first-page":"484","article-title":"Amniotic fluid volume at 41\u00a0weeks and infant outcome","volume":"51","author":"Lam","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"989","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02417.x","article-title":"The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study","volume":"110","author":"Morris","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1168","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90009-V","article-title":"The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy","volume":"162","author":"Moore","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.09.034","article-title":"The maximal vertical pocket and amniotic fluid index in predicting fetal distress in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"96","author":"Dasari","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0170","first-page":"252","article-title":"Antepartum testing in post-term pregnancy","volume":"33","author":"Benedetti","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04781.x","article-title":"The value of ultrasound measurement of amniotic fluid volume in the management of prolonged pregnancies","volume":"91","author":"Crowley","year":"1984","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0180","first-page":"698","article-title":"Amniotic fluid volume estimation in the post-date pregnancy: a comparison of techniques","volume":"81","author":"Fischer","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1354","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70019-0","article-title":"Does an amniotic fluid index of\u22645cm necessitate delivery in high-risk pregnancies? A case-control study","volume":"180","author":"Magann","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70369-1","article-title":"How frequently should the amniotic fluid index be performed during the course of antepartum testing?","volume":"174","author":"Wing","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(75)90951-5","article-title":"Placental insufficiency in relation to post-term pregnancy and fetal postmaturity. Evaluation of fetoplacental function; management of the post-term gravida","volume":"123","author":"Vorherr","year":"1975","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80005-X","article-title":"The efficacy of starting post-term antenatal testing at 41\u00a0weeks as compared with 42\u00a0weeks of gestational age","volume":"159","author":"Bochner","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90240-8","article-title":"Post-date fetal surveillance: is 41\u00a0weeks too early?","volume":"161","author":"Guidetti","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0210","first-page":"CD000170","article-title":"Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term","author":"Crowley","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0215","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","author":"Gulmezoglu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0225","first-page":"639","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists. Number 55, September 2004 (replaces practice pattern number 6, October 1997). Management of post-term pregnancy","volume":"104","author":"ACOG.","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32945-0","article-title":"Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0\u00a0to 42+0\u00a0weeks","volume":"30","author":"Delaney","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0235","series-title":"Induction of Labour- Evidence-based Clinical Guideline. Number 9","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90278-9","article-title":"Umbilical artery velocity waveforms and intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"151","author":"Fleischer","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90150-5","article-title":"The clinical significance of doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in the small for gestational age fetus","volume":"156","author":"Rochelson","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01044.x","article-title":"Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: clinical significance","volume":"92","author":"Trudinger","year":"1985","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1761","article-title":"Reference ranges for umbilical and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio in prolonged pregnancies","volume":"24","author":"Palacio","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1990.18.3.165","article-title":"Normal values of Pulsatility Index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556\u00a0healthy fetuses","volume":"18","author":"Arduini","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.05030189.x","article-title":"Doppler flow velocimetry of the umbilical artery, uteroplacental arteries and fetal middle cerebral artery in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"5","author":"Zimmermann","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1262","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)90620-6","article-title":"Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in normal and small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"166","author":"Mari","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199102000-00010","article-title":"Doppler velocimetry in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"77","author":"Battaglia","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0280","first-page":"259","article-title":"Uterine and umbilical artery doppler velocimetry in post-term pregnancy","volume":"33","author":"Farmakides","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1991.10.1.15","article-title":"Can umbilical and arcuate artery doppler velocimetry predict fetal distress among prolonged pregnancies?","volume":"10","author":"Forouzan","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1521","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(87)80255-7","article-title":"Fetal umbilical artery flow velocimetry in post-date pregnancies","volume":"157","author":"Guidetti","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1080\/j.0001-6349.2005.00741.x","article-title":"The use of fetal doppler cerebroplacental blood flow and amniotic fluid volume measurement in the surveillance of post-dated pregnancies","volume":"84","author":"Lam","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1991.01010040.x","article-title":"Fetal and uteroplacental blood flow in prolonged pregnancies. A clinical study","volume":"1","author":"Malcus","year":"1991","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1991.tb02759.x","article-title":"Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis in post-date pregnancies","volume":"31","author":"Stokes","year":"1991","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(93)90246-9","article-title":"The value of doppler ultrasonography in prolonged pregnancies","volume":"48","author":"Weiner","year":"1993","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)90244-5","article-title":"Post-term pregnancies with normal cardiotocographs and amniotic fluid columns: the role of doppler evaluation in predicting perinatal outcome","volume":"54","author":"Anteby","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0320","first-page":"856","article-title":"Middle cerebral to umbilical artery doppler ratio in post-date pregnancies","volume":"84","author":"Devine","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0325","first-page":"363","article-title":"Doppler evaluation of umbilical and uterine-arcuate arteries in the post-dates pregnancy","volume":"78","author":"Fischer","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199102000-00008","article-title":"A comparison of doppler flow velocity waveforms, amniotic fluid columns, and the nonstress test as a means of monitoring post-dates pregnancies","volume":"77","author":"Pearce","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0335","first-page":"891","article-title":"Fetal and maternal doppler blood flow parameters in post-term pregnancies","volume":"69","author":"Rightmire","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1738","article-title":"Middle cerebral artery doppler indices at different sites: prediction of umbilical cord gases in prolonged pregnancies","volume":"24","author":"Figueras","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13786.x","article-title":"Fetal middle cerebral artery blood flow during normal active labour and in labour with variable decelerations","volume":"99","author":"Yagel","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90276-7","article-title":"Is oligohydramnios in post-term pregnancy associated with redistribution of fetal blood flow?","volume":"173","author":"Bar-Hava","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90275-1","article-title":"Fetal biophysical profile scoring: a prospective study in 1,184\u00a0high-risk patients","volume":"140","author":"Manning","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11402.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of simple compared with complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42\u00a0weeks of gestation","volume":"102","author":"Alfirevic","year":"1995","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020_bib0365","first-page":"CD000038","article-title":"Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies","author":"Lalor","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231511002572?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231511002572?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,19]],"date-time":"2019-06-19T11:13:35Z","timestamp":1560942815000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231511002572"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"references-count":73,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231511002572"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}}}