{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,4]],"date-time":"2026-10-04T02:04:25Z","timestamp":1791079465526,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":82,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,8]],"date-time":"2011-11-08T03:31:05Z","timestamp":1320723065000},"page":"796-811","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Modalit\u00e9s du d\u00e9clenchement dans les grossesses prolong\u00e9es"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"N.","family":"Winer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0005","unstructured":"HAS 2007\u00a0: le d\u00e9clenchement du travail\u00a0: recommandations. http:\/\/www.has-sante.fr\/.\/declenchement-artificiel-du-travail-recommandations."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0010","unstructured":"National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Induction of labour. London: NICE; 2001;.(National Guideline on Induction of Labour) NICE 2001\/021\u00a0Issued 12\u00a0June 2001 http:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/article.asp?a=6834)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0015","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induction of labour. Evidence based clinical guideline number 9. London: RGOG;2001."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0020","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318226442d","article-title":"Using a simplified bishop score to predict vaginal delivery","volume":"118","author":"Laughon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00004","article-title":"Preinduction cervical assessment","volume":"43","author":"Edwards","year":"2000","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score","volume":"7","author":"Gonen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70498-4","article-title":"Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term","volume":"182","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6211","article-title":"Fetal Medicine Foundation Prolonged Pregnancy Group. Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery","volume":"32","author":"Rao","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery","volume":"29","author":"Tan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x","article-title":"Comparison of Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction","volume":"280","author":"Uyar","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2746","article-title":"Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"28","author":"Strobel","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5360","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor","volume":"32","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.014","article-title":"Biochemical and biophysical predictors of the response to the induction of labor in nulliparous postterm pregnancy","volume":"204","author":"Torricelli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0075","first-page":"CD000451","article-title":"Membrane sweeping for induction of labour","volume":"1","author":"Boulvain","year":"2005","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32945-0","article-title":"Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0\u00a0to 42+0\u00a0weeks","volume":"30","author":"Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903387078","article-title":"Membrane sweeping to induce labor in low-risk patients at term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"23","author":"Yildirim","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b8fa00","article-title":"Serial membrane sweeping at term in planned vaginal birth after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"114","author":"Hamdan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2011.30.2.227","article-title":"Effect of membrane sweeping on cervical length by transvaginal ultrasonography and impact of cervical shortening on caesarean delivery","volume":"30","author":"Tan","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816fdcf3","article-title":"The effect of membrane sweeping on prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"111","author":"Hill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00870.x","article-title":"Membrane sweeping and prevention of post-term pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"113","author":"De Miranda","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0110","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"22","author":"G\u00fclmezoglu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0115","first-page":"CD003246","article-title":"Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"7","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1345\/aph.1E037","article-title":"Highversus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation or induction of labor","volume":"39","author":"Patka","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Pharmacother"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00096.x","article-title":"For how long should oxytocin be continued during induction of labour?","volume":"111","author":"Daniel-Spiegel","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.010","article-title":"Oxytocin: new perspectives on an old drug","volume":"200","author":"Clark","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.025","article-title":"A protocol for the use of oxytocin","volume":"197","author":"Freeman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.026","article-title":"Implementation of a conservative, checklist driven protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes","volume":"197","author":"Clark","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.03.007","article-title":"High-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review","volume":"203","author":"Wei","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00338-5","article-title":"Randomized, doublemasked comparison of oxytocin dosage in induction and augmentation of labor","volume":"94","author":"Merrill","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09733.x","article-title":"Induction of labour: a randomised clinical trial of amniotomy versus amniotomy with oxytocininfusion","volume":"103","author":"Moldin","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0160","first-page":"CD003250","article-title":"Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"Howarth","year":"2001","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0165","unstructured":"NICE 2008, Induction of labour, Clinical Guideline,.(www.nice.org.uk\/CG070fullguideline)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0170","first-page":"CD007701","article-title":"Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings","volume":"8","author":"Dowswell","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610802196823","article-title":"A multi-centre audit on the use of vaginal prostaglandin for the induction of labour","volume":"28","author":"Selo-Ojeme","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610601113896","article-title":"Are we complying with NICE guidelines on the use of prostaglandin E2\u00a0for induction of labour? A survey of obstetric units in the UK","volume":"27","author":"Selo-Ojeme","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no\u00a0107: induction of labor","volume":"114","author":"Committee on practice ACOG bulletins\u2013obstetrics","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793e7","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08399.x","article-title":"Misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel","volume":"106","author":"Danielian","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-5456(01)00270-4","article-title":"Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone","volume":"108","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.13.4.254.259","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction","volume":"13","author":"Garry","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01644-1","article-title":"Labour induction with 25\u00a0vs 50\u03bcg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review","volume":"99","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0210","first-page":"CD000941","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0843-9","article-title":"Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial","volume":"280","author":"Ozkan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318209d669","article-title":"Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"117","author":"Wing","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279e88","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01829.x","article-title":"Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-labelstudy of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone","volume":"115","author":"Calder","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0230","first-page":"CD000941","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"10","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38729.513819.63","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial","volume":"332","author":"Dodd","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0240","first-page":"404","article-title":"Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction","volume":"57","author":"Rasheed","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Pak Med Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1366","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01111.x","article-title":"Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2\u00a0for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review","volume":"113","author":"Crane","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0250","first-page":"CD001338","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour","volume":"2","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00539-5","article-title":"Extemporaneous preparation of misoprostol gel for cervical ripening: a randomized trial","volume":"90","author":"Carlan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.00010.x","article-title":"A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction","volume":"111","author":"Van Gemund","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00496.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term","volume":"112","author":"Gregson","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03931.x","article-title":"The unfavorable cervix and the induction of labor using a cervical balloon","volume":"74","author":"Embrey","year":"1967","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0275","first-page":"CD001233","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"4","author":"Boulvain","year":"2001","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","article-title":"Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Vaknin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-009-1136-7","article-title":"Complications of trans-cervical Foley catheter for labor induction among 1,083\u00a0women","volume":"281","author":"Maslovitz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02905.x","article-title":"Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Fox","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005","article-title":"Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review","volume":"199","author":"Heinemann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12066.x","article-title":"Nitric oxide donors induce ripening of the human uterine cervix: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"104","author":"Thomson","year":"1997","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.034","article-title":"Outpatient vaginal administration of the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening and labor induction postterm: a randomized controlled study","volume":"196","author":"Bullarbo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1325","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(94)92468-6","article-title":"Arrest of preterm labour and prolongation of gestation with glyceryl trinitrate, a nitric oxide donor","volume":"343","author":"Lees","year":"1994","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0315","first-page":"77","article-title":"Pr\u00e9paration \u00e0 l\u2019accouchement par hom\u00e9opathie","volume":"94","author":"Dorfman","year":"1987","journal-title":"Cah Biother"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2006.12.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with homeopathy: a case report","volume":"52","author":"Kistin","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0325","first-page":"CD003399","article-title":"Homoeopathy for induction of labour","volume":"4","author":"Smith","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050600730740","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for initiation of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"19","author":"Harper","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0335","first-page":"CD002962","article-title":"Acupuncture for induction of labour","volume":"1","author":"Smith","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1067","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b46bb","article-title":"Acupuncture to induce labor: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"112","author":"Smith","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02647.x","article-title":"Acupuncture for the induction of labour: a double-blind randomised controlled study","volume":"117","author":"Modlock","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909020990","article-title":"Effect of nipple stimulation on uterine activity and on plasma levels of oxytocin in full term, healthy pregnant women","volume":"68","author":"Christensson","year":"1989","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0355","first-page":"CD003392","article-title":"Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"Kavanagh","year":"2005","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000223229.83920.af","article-title":"Effect of coitus at term on length of gestation, induction of labor, and mode of delivery","volume":"108","author":"Tan","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0365","first-page":"1062","article-title":"Coitus and orgasm at term: effect on spontaneous labour and pregnancy outcome","volume":"50","author":"Tan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-5456(00)00140-6","article-title":"Are there common triggers of preterm deliveries?","volume":"108","author":"Petridou","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000220507.91904.4a","article-title":"Sexual intercourse at term and onset of labor","volume":"107","author":"Schaffir","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.03.015","article-title":"Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Society of obstetricians and gynaecologists of Canada","volume":"89","author":"Clinical practice SOGC guidelines","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00355-7","article-title":"Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"102","author":"Delaney","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section","volume":"112","author":"Kayani","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.108890","article-title":"Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989\u00a0to 1999","volume":"183","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00675-6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075\u00a0patients who attempted vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: a review of the literature","volume":"189","author":"Chauhan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2\u00a0versus VBAC-1\u00a0and repeat (third) caesarean sections","volume":"117","author":"Tahseen","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231511002584?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231511002584?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,19]],"date-time":"2019-06-19T02:27:58Z","timestamp":1560911278000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231511002584"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"references-count":82,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231511002584"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}}}