{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T12:25:32Z","timestamp":1763036732770},"reference-count":84,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]],"date-time":"2012-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354320000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,14]],"date-time":"2012-11-14T19:45:18Z","timestamp":1352922318000},"page":"708-726","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["B\u00e9n\u00e9fices et risques maternels de la tentative de voie basse compar\u00e9e \u00e0 la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"G.","family":"Beucher","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Dolley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"L\u00e9vy-Thissier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Florian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Dreyfus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.11.008","article-title":"La sant\u00e9 p\u00e9rinatale en France m\u00e9tropolitaine de 1995\u00a0\u00e0 2010. R\u00e9sultats des enqu\u00eates nationales p\u00e9rinatales","volume":"41","author":"Blondel","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5","article-title":"National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement. Vaginal birth after caesarean: new insights March 8\u201310, 2010","volume":"115","author":"National Institutes of Health","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery. ACOG practice bulletin 115","volume":"116","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0020","series-title":"Vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery. ACOG practice bulletin 5","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0025","unstructured":"Blondel B, Kermarrec M. Enqu\u00eate nationale p\u00e9rinatale 2010. Les naissances en 2010\u00a0et leur \u00e9volution depuis 2003. Rapport mai 2011. www.drees.sante.gouv.fr."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0030","first-page":"51","article-title":"La c\u00e9sarienne a-t-elle une indication en cas d\u2019ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0?","volume":"29","author":"D\u2019Ercole","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0035","first-page":"CD004224","article-title":"Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth","volume":"4","author":"Dodd","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0040","first-page":"465","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality","volume":"77","author":"Rosen","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.108890","article-title":"Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989\u00a0to 1999","volume":"183","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.04.025","article-title":"Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after caesarean section vs elective repeat caesarean delivery: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"199","author":"Rossi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean: new insights on maternal and fetal outcomes","volume":"115","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior caesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001192","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001192","article-title":"Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial","volume":"9","author":"Crowther","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999621","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity to elective repeat caesarean section","volume":"6","author":"Eriksen","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0075","first-page":"161","article-title":"Twice a caesarean, always a caesarean?","volume":"73","author":"Phelan","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(90)90003-J","article-title":"The course of delivery after previous caesarean section","volume":"34","author":"Roumen","year":"1990","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0085","first-page":"1459","article-title":"Reducing the caesarean section rate in a rural community hospital","volume":"145","author":"Iglesias","year":"1991","journal-title":"Can Med Assoc J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.303.6806.818","article-title":"Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region","volume":"303","author":"Paterson","year":"1991","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0095","first-page":"1099","article-title":"Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system","volume":"167","author":"Troyer","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90885-6","article-title":"The experience with vaginal birth after caesarean delivery in a small rural community practice","volume":"168","author":"Raynor","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0105","first-page":"129","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: the patient's point of view","volume":"47","author":"Abitbol","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00005","article-title":"Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter trial","volume":"83","author":"Flamm","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1994.22.1.13","article-title":"The management of labor in women with more than one uterine scar: is a repeat caesarean section really the only \u201csafe\u201d option?","volume":"22","author":"Granovsky-Grisaru","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second caesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.100.3.348","article-title":"Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section and trial of labor","volume":"100","author":"Hook","year":"1997","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1998.tb00063.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: results in 310\u00a0pregnancies","volume":"24","author":"Obara","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00186-0","article-title":"Umbilical cord blood pH after prior caesarean delivery","volume":"92","author":"Swaim","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00446-3","article-title":"Delivery after previous caesarean: a risk evaluation","volume":"93","author":"Rageth","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after caesarean delivery","volume":"110","author":"Spong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31","article-title":"Trial of labor or repeat caesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous caesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Hibbard","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior caesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat caesarean deliveries","volume":"107","author":"Silver","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00416-4","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rate","volume":"96","author":"Bais","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.114852","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after caesarean safe? Experience at a communityhospital","volume":"184","author":"Blanchette","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115044","article-title":"Failed vaginal birth after a caesarean section: how risky is it?\u00a0I.\u00a0Maternal morbidity","volume":"184","author":"Hibbard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00464-X","article-title":"Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour","volume":"100","author":"Spaans","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017","article-title":"Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands","volume":"132","author":"Kwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2006.00675.x","article-title":"Labour and perinatal outcome in women at term with one previous lower-segment caesarean: a review of 1000\u00a0consecutive cases","volume":"47","author":"Tan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0195","series-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean: new insights. Evidence report\/technology assessment No.\u00a0191. AHRQ publication No.\u00a010-E003","author":"Guise","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0200","first-page":"3","article-title":"Outcome of a trial of labor after prior caesarean delivery","volume":"29","author":"Eglinton","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.008","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome","volume":"198","author":"Gregory","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668653","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Caesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Caesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital","volume":"15","author":"Loebel","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90746-9","article-title":"Vaginal delivery following previous caesarean birth","volume":"146","author":"Martin","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1510","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(87)80252-1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean","volume":"157","author":"Phelan","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.022","article-title":"Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective caesarean section among women with previous caesarean delivery","volume":"191","author":"Wen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior caesarean delivery","volume":"181","author":"Zelop","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.045","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat caesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?","volume":"195","author":"Cahill","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","article-title":"Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior caesarean deliveries","volume":"181","author":"Caughey","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00006","article-title":"Trial of labor following caesarean delivery","volume":"83","author":"Cowan","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199011000-00004","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study","volume":"76","author":"Flamm","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90224-4","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: results of a multicenter study","volume":"158","author":"Flamm","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0490-6","article-title":"The safety of a trial of labor after caesarean section in a grand multiparous population","volume":"277","author":"Kugler","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116729","article-title":"Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior caesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat caesarean section","volume":"185","author":"Chauhan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001724290","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure","volume":"15","author":"Durnwald","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1990.tb00722.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two or more caesarean sections: a five-year experience","volume":"17","author":"Hansell","year":"1990","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.10.018","article-title":"Effect of gestational age at the prior caesarean delivery on maternal morbidity in subsequent VBAC attempt","volume":"200","author":"Harper","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000149150.93552.78","article-title":"Risk factors for bladder injury during caesarean delivery","volume":"105","author":"Phipps","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.035","article-title":"Impact of multiple caesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review","volume":"205","author":"Marshall","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311.e11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.02.002","article-title":"Elective repeat caesarean delivery compared spontaneous trial of labor after a prior caesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis","volume":"206","author":"Gilbert","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.036","article-title":"Rupture ut\u00e9rine\u00a0: pr\u00e9diction, diagnostic et prise en charge","author":"Parant","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001184","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001184","article-title":"Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study","volume":"9","author":"Fitzpatrick","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033","article-title":"Crit\u00e8res d\u2019acceptation de la voie vaginale selon les caract\u00e9ristiques de la cicatrice ut\u00e9rine","author":"Kayem","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030","article-title":"Mode de d\u00e9clenchement du travail et conduite du travail en cas d\u2019ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel","author":"Deruelle","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31817946f4","article-title":"Risk factors for bladder injury in patients with a prior hysterotomy","volume":"112","author":"Cahill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.022","article-title":"Ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0: aspects \u00e9pid\u00e9miologiques","author":"Deneux-Tharaux","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.126977","article-title":"Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous patients, vaginal births after caesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery","volume":"187","author":"Richter","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.004","article-title":"Maternal outcomes at 2\u00a0years after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Hannah","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00227-8","article-title":"Caesarean section as a cause of chronic pelvic pain","volume":"79","author":"Almeida","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1914","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.7.1914","article-title":"The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population based sample of 14,541\u00a0pregnancies","volume":"17","author":"Murphy","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1542-2011.2011.00106.x","article-title":"The importance of mode of birth after previous caesarean: success, satisfaction and postnatal health","volume":"57","author":"Shorten","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.028","article-title":"Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat caesarean delivery","volume":"205","author":"Clark","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70192-9","article-title":"Trial of labor after caesarean delivery: the effect of previous vaginal delivery","volume":"179","author":"Caughey","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000134784.09455.21","article-title":"Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after caesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor","volume":"104","author":"Hendler","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9","article-title":"Labor outcomes with increasing with number of prior vaginal births after caesarean delivery","volume":"111","author":"Mercer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S29626","article-title":"Remote prognosis after primary caesarean delivery: the association of VBACs and recurrent caesarean deliveries with maternal morbidity","volume":"4","author":"Erez","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Women Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00833-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: trial of labor or repeat caesarean section? A decision analysis","volume":"189","author":"Mankuta","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00793.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes","volume":"113","author":"Par\u00e9","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0373-x","article-title":"Once a caesarean always a caesarean? A computer-assisted decision analysis","volume":"276","author":"Sadan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.039","article-title":"Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?","volume":"200","author":"Grobman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.104200","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after caesarean less expensive than repeat caesarean delivery?","volume":"182","author":"Clark","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2\u00a0versus VBAC-1\u00a0and repeat (third) caesarean sections","volume":"117","author":"Tahseen","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02498.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean for women with three or more prior caesareans: assessing safety and success","volume":"117","author":"Cahill","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0415","series-title":"Indications de la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e \u00e0 terme","author":"Haute Autorit\u00e9 de sant\u00e9","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.031","article-title":"Quelles sont les recommandations d\u2019organisation et d\u2019information en cas de proposition de tentative de voie basse pour ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0?","author":"Gallot","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002669?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002669?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,21]],"date-time":"2018-10-21T06:51:53Z","timestamp":1540104713000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231512002669"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":84,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231512002669"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}}}