{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T04:23:16Z","timestamp":1782879796891,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":74,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]],"date-time":"2012-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354320000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,4]],"date-time":"2012-11-04T00:01:50Z","timestamp":1351987310000},"page":"772-781","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Situations cliniques particuli\u00e8res, maternelles ou f\u0153tales, influen\u00e7ant le choix du mode d\u2019accouchement en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"T.","family":"Schmitz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028","article-title":"B\u00e9n\u00e9fices et risques maternels de la tentative de voie basse compar\u00e9e \u00e0 la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne","author":"Beucher","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.034","article-title":"B\u00e9n\u00e9fices et risques n\u00e9onataux de la tentative de voie basse compar\u00e9e \u00e0 la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne","author":"Lopez","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01792-6","article-title":"The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"Shipp","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.055","article-title":"Trial of labor in patients with a previous cesarean section: does maternal age influence the outcome?","volume":"190","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0030","first-page":"414","article-title":"Risk of labor abnormalities with advancing maternal age","volume":"55","author":"Cohen","year":"1980","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00335-4","article-title":"Effect of very advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome and rate of cesarean delivery","volume":"92","author":"Dulitzki","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2002-20175","article-title":"Impact of advance maternal age on pregnancy outcome","volume":"19","author":"Seoud","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(96)02747-6","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section in the grand multipara with a previous lower segment scar","volume":"55","author":"Dyack","year":"1996","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0490-6","article-title":"The safety of a trial of labor after cesarean section in a grand multiparous population","volume":"277","author":"Kugler","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery","volume":"111","author":"Mercer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032","article-title":"Quels facteurs influencent la voie d\u2019accouchement en cas de tentative de voie basse sur ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0?","author":"Haumont\u00e9","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0065","first-page":"987","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean in the diabetic gravida","volume":"45","author":"Blackwell","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1104","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115176","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean among women with gestational diabetes","volume":"184","author":"Coleman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1239487","article-title":"Pregestational diabetes: a risk factor for vaginal birth after cesarean section failure?","volume":"27","author":"Dharan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c534ca","volume":"115","author":"Cormier","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.068","article-title":"Diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus does not influence the success rates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"190","author":"Marchiano","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000107291.46159.00","article-title":"Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome","volume":"103","author":"Cedergren","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e8444","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0008444","article-title":"Severe obesity in young women and reproductive health: the Danish National Birth Cohort","volume":"4","author":"Nohr","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-789X.2009.00700.x","article-title":"Obesity and postoperative complications in patients undergoing non-bariatric surgery","volume":"11","author":"Doyle","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obes Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2010.03.012","article-title":"Obesity increases wound complications in rectal cancer surgery","volume":"163","author":"Balentine","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70227-6","article-title":"Massive maternal obesity and perioperative cesarean morbidity","volume":"170","author":"Perlow","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"959","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02323-2","article-title":"Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery","volume":"100","author":"Myles","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116729","article-title":"Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section","volume":"185","author":"Chauhan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1516","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.472","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: weight-based outcomes","volume":"188","author":"Carroll","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00710-5","article-title":"Deciding on route of delivery for obese women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"189","author":"Edwards","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.051","article-title":"The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success","volume":"191","author":"Durnwald","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.075","article-title":"Obesity as a risk factor for failed trial of labor in patients with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"192","author":"Goodall","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Hibbard","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0155","series-title":"RCOG green top guidelines: the management of breech presentation guideline No.\u00a020","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200112000-00045","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion No.\u00a0265. Mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"98","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34222-0","article-title":"Vaginal delivery of breech presentation","volume":"31","author":"Kotaska","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200607000-00058","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion No.\u00a0340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"108","author":"ACOG Committee on obstetric practice","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90223-8","article-title":"Breech presentation after cesarean section: always a section?","volume":"161","author":"Ophir","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0185","first-page":"831","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Trial of labor in women with breech presentation","volume":"34","author":"Sarno","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(90)90580-E","article-title":"Breech vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: a retrospective study","volume":"33","author":"El Gammal","year":"1990","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0195","series-title":"Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. C\u00e9sarienne\u00a0: cons\u00e9quences et indications","author":"CNGOF","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0200","series-title":"Indications de la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e \u00e0 terme","author":"Haute Autorit\u00e9 de sant\u00e9","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2009.006","article-title":"External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36\u00a0cases and review of the literature","volume":"37","author":"Abenhaim","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2008.08.012","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"142","author":"Sela","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(98)00149-3","article-title":"External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: a series of 38\u00a0cases","volume":"81","author":"De-Meeus","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(94)90760-9","article-title":"External cephalic version after previous cesarean section\u00a0\u2014\u00a0a clinical dilemma","volume":"45","author":"Schachter","year":"1994","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90095-9","article-title":"External cephalic version after previous cesarean section","volume":"165","author":"Flamm","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-536x.2000.00019.x","article-title":"Routine use of external cephalic version in three hospitals","volume":"27","author":"Regalia","year":"2000","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.008","article-title":"Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis","volume":"199","author":"Kok","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06824.x","article-title":"The management of multiple pregnancy in women with a lower segment cesarean scar. Is a repeat cesarean section really the \u201csafe\u201d option?","volume":"95","author":"Gilbert","year":"1988","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90224-X","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the twin gestation","volume":"161","author":"Strong","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70274-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation","volume":"175","author":"Miller","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709024607","article-title":"Evidence that women with a history of cesarean section can deliver twins safely","volume":"76","author":"Odeh","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0260","first-page":"820","article-title":"Twin delivery after cesarean section: is a trial of labor warranted?","volume":"28","author":"Aboulfalah","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0265","first-page":"205","article-title":"Twin vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"64","author":"Wax","year":"2000","journal-title":"Conn Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31031-3","article-title":"Trial of labour compared to elective Cesarean in twin gestations with a previous Cesarean delivery","volume":"25","author":"Delaney","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31032-5","article-title":"Twin delivery after a previous cesarean: a twelve-year experience","volume":"25","author":"Sansregret","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.3.171.174","article-title":"Vaginal birth of twins after a previous Cesarean section","volume":"10","author":"Myles","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903156700","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean section in twin pregnancies: maternal and neonatal safety","volume":"23","author":"Aaronson","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.06.038","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies: is it safe?","volume":"193","author":"Cahill","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.03.023","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation","volume":"193","author":"Varner","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.036","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: a large, nationwide sample of deliveries","volume":"195","author":"Ford","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2004.08.013","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestation: is trial of labor allowed?","volume":"32","author":"Coutty","year":"2004","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0310","first-page":"36","article-title":"Previous cesarean birth. Trial of labor in women with macrosomic infants","volume":"29","author":"Phelan","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0315","first-page":"694","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication?","volume":"74","author":"Flamm","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0320","first-page":"409","article-title":"Delivery of large baby after cesarean section: role of trial of labor. A propos of 355\u00a0cases","volume":"29","author":"Aboulfalah","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117361","article-title":"Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with f\u0153tuses weighing>4000g","volume":"185","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.186","article-title":"The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates","volume":"188","author":"Elkousy","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c915da","article-title":"Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"115","author":"Jastrow","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0340","first-page":"41","article-title":"Post-term pregnancy after previous cesarean section","volume":"29","author":"Yeh","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0345","first-page":"606","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of attempted vaginal birth after cesarean beyond the estimated date of delivery","volume":"44","author":"Callahan","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01175-3","article-title":"Trial of labor after 40\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation in women with prior cesarean","volume":"97","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668329","article-title":"The effect of gestational age on trial of labor after Cesarean section","volume":"15","author":"Hammoud","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000179389.82986.50","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40\u00a0weeks of gestation","volume":"106","author":"Coassolo","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000153493.15922.85","article-title":"The effect of prematurity on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: success and maternal morbidity","volume":"105","author":"Qui\u00f1ones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.047","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry: safety and efficacy of a trial of labor in preterm pregnancy after a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"195","author":"Durnwald","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002670?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002670?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,21]],"date-time":"2018-10-21T19:23:19Z","timestamp":1540149799000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231512002670"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":74,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231512002670"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}}}