{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T12:25:34Z","timestamp":1763036734758},"reference-count":91,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]],"date-time":"2012-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354320000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,9]],"date-time":"2012-11-09T11:02:25Z","timestamp":1352458945000},"page":"788-802","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["Mode de d\u00e9clenchement du travail et conduite du travail en cas d\u2019ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"P.","family":"Deruelle","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Lepage","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Depret","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Clouqueur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0005","series-title":"Enqu\u00eate nationale p\u00e9rinatale 2010","author":"Blondel","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200407000-00060","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous cesarean","volume":"104","author":"Practice Bulletin ACOG #54","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0015","series-title":"Birth after previous Cesarean birth. Green-Top Guideline No\u00a045","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0020","first-page":"319","article-title":"Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005","volume":"89","author":"SOGC Clinical practice guidelines","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00300-2","article-title":"Weekly administration of prostaglandin E2\u00a0gel compared with expectant management in women with previous cesareans","volume":"94","author":"Rayburn","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619309151705","article-title":"A prospective random allocation trial to compare vaginal prostaglandin E2\u00a0with intravenous oxytocin for labour induction in women previously delivered by caesarean section","volume":"13","author":"Taylor","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13150.x","article-title":"Mifepristone for labour induction after previous caesarean section","volume":"101","author":"Lelaidier","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70256-X","article-title":"Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"179","author":"Wing","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.318.7190.1056","article-title":"Evidence based case report: use of prostaglandins to induce labour in women with a caesarean section scar","volume":"318","author":"Vause","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","article-title":"Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00446-3","article-title":"Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation","volume":"93","author":"Rageth","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section","volume":"117","author":"Al-Zirqi","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study","volume":"117","author":"Dekker","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","article-title":"Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001184","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001184","article-title":"Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study","volume":"9","author":"Fitzpatrick","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2004.00258.x","article-title":"Induction of labour for women with a previous Caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature","volume":"44","author":"Dodd","year":"2004","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0090","first-page":"CD004906","article-title":"Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth","volume":"4","author":"Dodd","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.542516","article-title":"Induction of labour in women with one previous caesarean section","volume":"31","author":"Gupta","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610701812090","article-title":"National survey of obstetricians in Wales regarding induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section","volume":"28","author":"Udayasankar","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00355-7","article-title":"Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"102","author":"Delaney","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03126.x","article-title":"Induction of labour after 1\u00a0previous Caesarean section","volume":"39","author":"McNally","year":"1999","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500280317","article-title":"Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: a retrospective study in a district general hospital","volume":"25","author":"Pathadey","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.045","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?","volume":"195","author":"Cahill","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13149.x","article-title":"Planned vaginal delivery after two previous caesarean sections","volume":"101","author":"Chattopadhyay","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0130","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights","volume":"191","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"183","author":"Ravasia","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery","volume":"181","author":"Zelop","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610902743789","article-title":"Vaginal prostaglandin gel to induce labour in women with one previous caesarean section","volume":"29","author":"Agnew","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.09.005","article-title":"Cervical ripening with dinoprostone gel and previous cesarean delivery","volume":"91","author":"Ardiet","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994118","article-title":"Prostaglandin E2\u00a0for cervical ripening: a multicenter study of patients with prior cesarean delivery","volume":"14","author":"Flamm","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.02.019","article-title":"Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2\u00a0in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix","volume":"116","author":"Yogev","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1551","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70051-7","article-title":"Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital","volume":"180","author":"Blanchette","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00539-5","article-title":"Extemporaneous preparation of misoprostol gel for cervical ripening: a randomized trial","volume":"90","author":"Carlan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91340-8","article-title":"Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2\u00a0gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison","volume":"173","author":"Chuck","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70340-0","article-title":"Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone","volume":"178","author":"Perry","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"774","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00013-1","article-title":"A randomized trial of misoprostol and extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"91","author":"Vengalil","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318209d669","article-title":"Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"117","author":"Wing","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00363-4","article-title":"Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"113","author":"Aslan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1535","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70049-9","article-title":"Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section","volume":"180","author":"Plaut","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.055","article-title":"Trial of labor in patients with a previous cesarean section: does maternal age influence the outcome?","volume":"190","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00421.x","article-title":"Use of the Atad catheter for the induction of labour in women who have had a previous Caesarean section\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a case series","volume":"45","author":"Miller","year":"2005","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","article-title":"Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study","volume":"193","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02190.x","article-title":"Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: a systematic review","volume":"116","author":"Berghella","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.013","article-title":"Second- and third-trimester management of medical termination of pregnancy and fetal death in utero after prior caesarean section","volume":"157","author":"Cayrac","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.02.008","article-title":"Midtrimester abortion using vaginal misoprostol for women with three or more prior cesarean deliveries","volume":"110","author":"Fawzy","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(93)90173-A","article-title":"Intravenous sulprostone and uterine scarring based upon 22\u00a0cases of therapeutic abortion during 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy","volume":"50","author":"Marpeau","year":"1993","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2009.01044.x","article-title":"Midtrimester termination of pregnancy using gemeprost in combination with laminaria in women who have previously undergone cesarean section","volume":"35","author":"Obata-Yasuoka","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.08.031","article-title":"Patients\u2019 obstetric history in mid-trimester termination of pregnancy with gemeprost: does it really matter?","volume":"130","author":"Scioscia","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.10.005","article-title":"Second- and third-trimester termination of pregnancy in women with uterine scar - a retrospective analysis of 111\u00a0gemeprost-induced terminations of pregnancy after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"85","author":"Domrose","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1992.tb01948.x","article-title":"Symptoms and signs with scar rupture\u00a0\u2013\u00a0value of uterine activity measurements","volume":"32","author":"Arulkumaran","year":"1992","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13391.x","article-title":"Scar rupture in labour after previous lower uterine segment caesarean section: the role of uterine activity measurement","volume":"98","author":"Beckley","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01171-6","article-title":"Oxytocin dose and the risk of uterine rupture in trial of labor after cesarean","volume":"97","author":"Goetzl","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section","volume":"112","author":"Kayani","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90375-X","article-title":"Uterine rupture: are intrauterine pressure catheters useful in the diagnosis?","volume":"161","author":"Rodriguez","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0285","first-page":"713","article-title":"Trial of labor in previous cesarean section patients, excluding classical cesarean sections","volume":"70","author":"Stovall","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.04.005","article-title":"Does a maximum dose of oxytocin affect risk for uterine rupture in candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery?","volume":"197","author":"Cahill","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.001","article-title":"Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"199","author":"Cahill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"996","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90457-3","article-title":"Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section","volume":"165","author":"Farmer","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)90765-0","article-title":"Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case-control study","volume":"168","author":"Leung","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(95)02431-B","article-title":"The partograph in the management of labor following cesarean section","volume":"50","author":"Khan","year":"1995","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0315","first-page":"307","article-title":"Peridural obstetrical analgesia and the cicatricial uterus. A 4-year evaluation","volume":"39","author":"Charrat","year":"1991","journal-title":"Cah Anesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0320","first-page":"621","article-title":"Epidural analgesia for planned vaginal delivery following previous cesarean section","volume":"64","author":"Rudick","year":"1984","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00164-M","article-title":"Comparison of the effects of meperidine and nalbuphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings","volume":"86","author":"Giannina","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)90265-8","article-title":"Uterine rupture in pregnancy reviewed","volume":"56","author":"Gardeil","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02161-0","article-title":"A 10-year population-based study of uterine rupture","volume":"100","author":"Kieser","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0340","first-page":"51","article-title":"Is cesarean section indicated for the cicatricial uterus?","volume":"29","author":"D\u2019Ercole","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349409013434","article-title":"Routine revision of uterine scar after prior cesarean section","volume":"73","author":"Kaplan","year":"1994","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(92)90082-A","article-title":"Routine previous cesarean scar exploration following successful vaginal delivery. Is it necessary?","volume":"45","author":"Lurie","year":"1992","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0355","first-page":"253","article-title":"Scarred uterus: is routine exploration of the cesarean scar after vaginal birth always necessary?","volume":"28","author":"Perrotin","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(98)00005-0","article-title":"Routine revision of uterine scar after cesarean section: has it ever been necessary?","volume":"78","author":"Silberstein","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(90)91019-M","article-title":"True rupture\/scar dehiscence in delivery following prior section","volume":"31","author":"Meehan","year":"1990","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1159\/000053007","article-title":"Induction of labor in grand multiparous women and previous cesarean section: is it safe?","volume":"53","author":"Abu-Heija","year":"2002","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994519","article-title":"Labor induction in patients with previous cesarean section","volume":"12","author":"Adair","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1159\/000143388","article-title":"Conducting labor in women with previous caesarean section in a low gestational week. A prospective case-controlled study","volume":"66","author":"Binder","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.114852","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after cesarean safe? Experience at a community hospital","volume":"184","author":"Blanchette","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00006","article-title":"Trial of labor following cesarean delivery","volume":"83","author":"Cowan","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0395","first-page":"709","article-title":"Oxytocin during labor after previous cesarean section: results of a multicenter study","volume":"70","author":"Flamm","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.005","article-title":"Uterine rupture and its complications in the Netherlands: a prospective study","volume":"128","author":"Kwee","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1394","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00287.x","article-title":"Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section","volume":"111","author":"Locatelli","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1275386","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: risk of uterine rupture with labor induction","volume":"28","author":"Ouzounian","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0415","first-page":"549","article-title":"Uterine rupture with the use of PGE2\u00a0vaginal inserts for labor induction in women with previous cesarean sections","volume":"47","author":"Taylor","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.022","article-title":"Association of induction of labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean: a survival analysis","volume":"206","author":"Harper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.03.023","article-title":"Risk factors for uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section: a case-control study","volume":"151","author":"Weimar","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00312-6","article-title":"Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy in the scarred uterus","volume":"83","author":"Herabutya","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000151996.16422.88","article-title":"Misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"105","author":"Dickinson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00285.x","article-title":"Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean section","volume":"112","author":"Daskalakis","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.12.047","article-title":"Second-trimester pregnancy termination with oral misoprostol in women who have had one cesarean section","volume":"90","author":"Tarim","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.03.023","article-title":"The use of vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with previous single cesarean section","volume":"74","author":"Daponte","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030_bib0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2006.00673.x","article-title":"Misoprostol for termination of mid-trimester post-Caesarean pregnancy","volume":"47","author":"Bhattacharjee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002682?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002682?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,21]],"date-time":"2018-10-21T14:56:01Z","timestamp":1540133761000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231512002682"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":91,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231512002682"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}}}