{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,25]],"date-time":"2026-03-25T11:24:51Z","timestamp":1774437891701,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]],"date-time":"2012-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354320000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,9]],"date-time":"2012-11-09T04:45:20Z","timestamp":1352436320000},"page":"735-752","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Quels facteurs influencent la voie d\u2019accouchement en cas de tentative de voie basse sur ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"J.-B.","family":"Haumont\u00e9","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Raylet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Sabiani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"O.","family":"Frank\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Bretelle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Boubli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"d\u2019Ercole","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0005","first-page":"9","article-title":"C\u00e9sarienne, cons\u00e9quence et indication","volume":"29","author":"Recommandation pour la pratique clinique, CNGOF","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.11.008","article-title":"Trends in perinatal health in France between 1995\u00a0and 2010: results from the national perinatal surveys","volume":"41","author":"Blondel","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0015","series-title":"Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights, Evidence Report\/Technology Assessment No, 191, (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No 290-2007-10057-I) AHRQ Publication No, 10-E001","author":"Guise","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0020","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery, clinical management guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists","volume":"54","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"1998","journal-title":"ACOG Pract Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0025","first-page":"319","article-title":"Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth, Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005","volume":"89","author":"Society of Obstetricians, Gynaecologists of Canada, SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0030","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean section. Green Top Guideline; February 2005, No 45."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00531-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system","volume":"90","author":"Flamm","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","article-title":"Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","article-title":"The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"193","author":"Landon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0050","first-page":"15","article-title":"Factors affecting mode of delivery in labour following a single previous birth by cesarean","volume":"16","author":"Strong","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwm363","article-title":"Effect of hospital volume on maternal outcomes in women with prior cesarean delivery undergoing trial of labor","volume":"167","author":"Chang","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2003.09.002","article-title":"Predictors of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"85","author":"Cameron","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.03.008","article-title":"Preferred and actual delivery mode after a cesarean in London, UK","volume":"102","author":"Selo-Ojeme","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.075","article-title":"Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"191","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70192-9","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the effect of previous vaginal delivery","volume":"179","author":"Caughey","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-835961","article-title":"Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score","volume":"21","author":"Gonen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139516.43748.1b","article-title":"Increased success of trial of labor after previous vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"104","author":"Gyamfi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1994.03520070044036","article-title":"Socioeconomic factors and the Odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"272","author":"King","year":"1994","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03126.x","article-title":"Induction of labour after 1\u00a0previous caesarean section","volume":"39","author":"McNally","year":"1999","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000153493.15922.85","article-title":"The effect of prematurity on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: success and maternal morbidity","volume":"105","author":"Quinones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00790-0","article-title":"Labor after previous cesarean: influence of prior indication and parity","volume":"95","author":"Shipp","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020252","article-title":"Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section","volume":"2","author":"Smith","year":"2005","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00464-X","article-title":"Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour","volume":"100","author":"Spaans","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259313.46842.71","article-title":"Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"Srinivas","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70393-9","article-title":"Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"174","author":"Weinstein","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01175-3","article-title":"Trial of labor after 40\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation in women with prior cesarean","volume":"97","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117361","article-title":"Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing>4000g","volume":"185","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050600847809","article-title":"Ethnic disparity in the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"19","author":"Hollard","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109386","article-title":"Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks","volume":"184","author":"Macones","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.01.002","article-title":"Obstetrical outcome and risk of uterine rupture following a caesarean section before 32\u00a0weeks","volume":"40","author":"Maisonneuve","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050601036527","article-title":"Outcome of subsequent delivery after a previous early preterm cesarean section","volume":"20","author":"Kwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802491490","article-title":"History of cesarean before 32\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation and trial of labor: what is the risk of uterine rupture?","volume":"88","author":"Estrade","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c915da","article-title":"Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"115","author":"Jastrow","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116729","article-title":"Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section","volume":"185","author":"Chauhan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00046-X","article-title":"Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"89","author":"Hoskins","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1516","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.472","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: weight-based outcomes","volume":"188","author":"Carroll","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9","article-title":"Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery","volume":"111","author":"Mercer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01652-0","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"Huang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2\u00a0versus VBAC-1\u00a0and repeat (third) caesarean sections","volume":"117","author":"Tahseen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000177972.32941.65","article-title":"Effect of body mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"106","author":"Juhasz","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0205","first-page":"CD000161","article-title":"Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at term","volume":"2","author":"Pattinson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.06.011","article-title":"\u00c9tat des lieux en France de la prise en charge des ut\u00e9rus cicatriciels","volume":"40","author":"Sans-Michel","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13462.x","article-title":"The role of postnatal X-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery","volume":"98","author":"Krishnamurthy","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15265.x","article-title":"Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: is X-ray pelvimetry necessary?","volume":"100","author":"Thubisi","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2006.037","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: X-ray pelvimetry at term is informative","volume":"34","author":"Sibony","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8930","article-title":"Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used","volume":"38","author":"Melamed","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0240","first-page":"257","article-title":"Predictors of repeat cesarean delivery after trial of labor: do any 28, exist?","volume":"182","author":"Learman","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f2de49","article-title":"New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean. Can it be predicted?","volume":"116","author":"Eden","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.10.884","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: a prenatal scoring tool","volume":"196","author":"Hashima","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)80046-9","article-title":"Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system","volume":"167","author":"Troyer","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0260","first-page":"729","article-title":"Evaluation of prognostic factors for vaginal delivery after cesarean section","volume":"38","author":"Jakobi","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1811","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91572-R","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: are there useful and valid predictors of success or failure?","volume":"166","author":"Pickhardt","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000110544.42128.7a","article-title":"Predicting failed trial of labor after primary cesarean delivery","volume":"103","author":"Dinsmoor","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0275","first-page":"332","article-title":"Predicting the success of a trial of labor with a simple scoring system","volume":"45","author":"Vinueza","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bb0dde","article-title":"Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"114","author":"Costantine","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alamia VJ, Meyer BA, Selioutski O, Vohra N. Can a VBAC scoring system predict uterine rupture in patients attempting a trial of labor? In: ACOG 47th Annual Clinical Meeting; May 19;1999.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)90143-6"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.042","article-title":"Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?","volume":"195","author":"Macones","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study","volume":"117","author":"Dekker","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.036","article-title":"Rupture ut\u00e9rine\u00a0: pr\u00e9diction, diagnostic et prise en charge","author":"Parant","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028","article-title":"B\u00e9n\u00e9fices et risques maternels de la tentative de voie basse compar\u00e9e \u00e0 la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne","author":"Beucher","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002700?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002700?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,5]],"date-time":"2019-07-05T12:09:51Z","timestamp":1562328591000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231512002700"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231512002700"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}}}