{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T16:26:19Z","timestamp":1790007979267,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":94,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]],"date-time":"2012-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354320000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,9]],"date-time":"2012-11-09T11:02:06Z","timestamp":1352458926000},"page":"753-771","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["Crit\u00e8res d\u2019acceptation de la voie vaginale selon les caract\u00e9ristiques de la cicatrice ut\u00e9rine"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"G.","family":"Kayem","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Raiffort","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Legardeur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Gavard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Mandelbrot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Girard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.045","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery\u00a0?","volume":"195","author":"Cahill","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","article-title":"Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries","volume":"181","author":"Caughey","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery","volume":"110","author":"Spong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00006","article-title":"Trial of labor following cesarean delivery","volume":"83","author":"Cowan","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90224-4","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: results of a multicenter study","volume":"158","author":"Flamm","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199011000-00004","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study","volume":"76","author":"Flamm","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668653","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital","volume":"15","author":"Loebel","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7462.359","article-title":"Vaginal delivery after caesarean section","volume":"329","author":"Guise","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.036","article-title":"Rupture ut\u00e9rine: pr\u00e9diction, diagnostic et prise en charge","author":"Parant","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028","article-title":"B\u00e9n\u00e9fices et risques maternels de la tentative de voie basse compar\u00e9e \u00e0 la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne","author":"Beucher","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.034","article-title":"B\u00e9n\u00e9fices et risques n\u00e9onataux de la tentative de voie basse compar\u00e9e \u00e0 la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne","author":"Lopez","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0065","article-title":"Mode de d\u00e9clenchement du travail et conduite du travail en cas d\u2019ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel","author":"Lepage","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.01.012","article-title":"Trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section in patients with uterine Mullerian anomalies: a population-based study","volume":"196","author":"Erez","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70318-2","article-title":"Incidence of uterine rupture among women with mullerian duct anomalies who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"181","author":"Ravasia","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e41be3","article-title":"The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"116","author":"Bujold","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1156","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903551483","article-title":"Vaginal delivery after Misgav-Ladach cesarean section \u2013 is the risk of uterine rupture acceptable?","volume":"23","author":"Hudic","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c915da","article-title":"Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"115","author":"Jastrow","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.03.023","article-title":"Risk factors for uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section: a case-control study","volume":"151","author":"Weimar","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050600849383","article-title":"Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture","volume":"19","author":"Gyamfi","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"925","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)01056-1","article-title":"Uterine rupture perioperative perinatal morbidity after single-layer double-layer closure at cesarean delivery","volume":"189","author":"Durnwald","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)84257-3","article-title":"One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy","volume":"89","author":"Chapman","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.04.013","article-title":"Single versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture","volume":"115","author":"Roberge","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(52)90074-4","article-title":"Myomectomy\u00a0; surgical technique and results in a series of 1150\u00a0cases","volume":"63","author":"Davids","year":"1952","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)34501-X","article-title":"Abdominal myomectomy","volume":"99","author":"Brown","year":"1967","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1128","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(58)90838-X","article-title":"Myomectomy with subsequent pregnancy","volume":"75","author":"McCormick","year":"1958","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1970.tb03499.x","article-title":"Myomectomy at the Chelsea hospital for women","volume":"77","author":"Loeffler","year":"1970","journal-title":"J Obstet Gyn Br Comm"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0140","first-page":"898","article-title":"Uterine rupture during pregnancy: an analysis of 133\u00a0Patients","volume":"23","author":"Garnet","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(66)90064-0","article-title":"Rupture of the gravid uterus in the third trimester","volume":"94","author":"Palerme","year":"1966","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0150","first-page":"752","article-title":"First-trimester spontaneous uterine rupture after traditional myomectomy: case report","volume":"33","author":"Ozeren","year":"1997","journal-title":"Isr J Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0155","first-page":"367","article-title":"Sigmoido-uterine rupture in pregnancy after multiple myomectomy","volume":"66","author":"Georgakopoulos","year":"1981","journal-title":"International surgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(90)90716-X","article-title":"Early spontaneous rupture of the post myomectomy gravid uterus","volume":"31","author":"Golan","year":"1990","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2663","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.12.2663","article-title":"Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy","volume":"15","author":"Seracchioli","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.11.075","article-title":"Obstetric and delivery outcome of pregnancies achieved after laparoscopic myomectomy","volume":"86","author":"Seracchioli","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertility and sterility"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.4.869","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome and deliveries following laparoscopic myomectomy","volume":"15","author":"Dubuisson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.01.013","article-title":"Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy","volume":"14","author":"Sizzi","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.10.011","article-title":"Uterine rupture in a primigravida with adenomyosis recently subjected to laparoscopic resection of rectovaginal endometriosis: case report","volume":"15","author":"Villa","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610701811738","article-title":"Does the surgical approach used for myomectomy influence the morbidity in subsequent pregnancy?","volume":"28","author":"Kelly","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.10.024","article-title":"Uterine rupture after laparoscopic removal of a pedunculated myoma","volume":"14","author":"Parker","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0200","first-page":"141","article-title":"Laparoscopic Myomectomy","volume":"15","author":"Peacock","year":"2006","journal-title":"Surgical technology international"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.04.015","article-title":"Risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy","volume":"17","author":"Parker","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.10.010","article-title":"Late complications of operative hysteroscopy: predicting patients at risk of uterine rupture during subsequent pregnancy","volume":"120","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"934\u00a0e1-3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.08.075","article-title":"Uterine rupture at the 29th week of subsequent pregnancy after hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum","volume":"91","author":"Satiroglu","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1666","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91398-X","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower-segment, vertical uterine incision: is it safe?","volume":"172","author":"Naef","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"966","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70334-4","article-title":"Trial of labor in patients with a previous lower uterine vertical cesarean section","volume":"174","author":"Adair","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00398-1","article-title":"Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with prior lower uterine segment vertical and transverse incisions","volume":"94","author":"Shipp","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1997.tb02243.x","article-title":"The relationship between gestational age and the incidence of classical caesarean section","volume":"37","author":"Bethune","year":"1997","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1957.tb02607.x","article-title":"The ruptured caesarean section scar","volume":"64","author":"Dewhurst","year":"1957","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0245","first-page":"465","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality","volume":"77","author":"Rosen","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0250","first-page":"197","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Number 5, July 1999 (replaces practice bulletin number 2, October 1998). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","volume":"66","author":"ACOG practice bulletin","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0255","series-title":"Pregnancy and labor following cesarean section","author":"Douglas","year":"1969"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02239-1","article-title":"Pregnancy after classic cesarean delivery","volume":"100","author":"Chauhan","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06502.x","article-title":"Classical versus low-segment transverse incision for preterm caesarean section: maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies","volume":"95","author":"Halperin","year":"1988","journal-title":"Brit J Obstet Gynaec"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0270","first-page":"31","article-title":"Vaginal delivery after cesarean section in women with unknown types of uterine scar","volume":"29","author":"Beall","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80141-8","article-title":"Unknown uterine scar and trial of labor","volume":"159","author":"Pruett","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)90765-0","article-title":"Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case-control study","volume":"168","author":"Leung","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(89)80029-8","article-title":"Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery","volume":"160","author":"Nielsen","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02319-0","article-title":"Post-cesarean delivery fever and uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor","volume":"101","author":"Shipp","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00328-6","article-title":"Vaginal birth following two previous cesarean sections","volume":"94","author":"Bretelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00078-6","article-title":"More than one previous cesarean delivery: a 5-year experience with 435\u00a0patients","volume":"85","author":"Asakura","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.082","article-title":"Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?","volume":"192","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.01.041","article-title":"Frequent epidural dosing as a marker for impending uterine rupture in patients who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"202","author":"Cahill","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2\u00a0versus VBAC-1\u00a0and repeat (third) caesarean sections","volume":"117","author":"Tahseen","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/s003300050103","article-title":"Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections","volume":"7","author":"Dicle","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1180","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109046","article-title":"Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case-control study","volume":"183","author":"Esposito","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01129-7","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture","volume":"97","author":"Shipp","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01652-0","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"Huang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127138","volume":"187","author":"Bujold","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46","article-title":"Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"110","author":"Stamilio","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1003","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d992fb","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18\u00a0and 24\u00a0months","volume":"115","author":"Bujold","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500275911","article-title":"Previous preterm cesarean delivery: identification of a new risk factor for uterine rupture in VBAC candidates","volume":"18","author":"Rochelson","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802491490","article-title":"History of cesarean before 32\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation and trial of labor: what is the risk of uterine rupture?","volume":"88","author":"Estrade","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050601036527","article-title":"Outcome of subsequent delivery after a previous early preterm cesarean section","volume":"20","author":"Kwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.01.002","article-title":"Obstetrical outcome and risk of uterine rupture following a caesarean section before 32\u00a0weeks","volume":"40","author":"Maisonneuve","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.10.018","article-title":"Effect of gestational age at the prior cesarean delivery on maternal morbidity in subsequent VBAC attempt","volume":"200","author":"Harper","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318163cd3e","article-title":"Previous preterm cesarean delivery and risk of subsequent uterine rupture","volume":"111","author":"Sciscione","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00634711","article-title":"Prenatal predictors of cesarean section due to labor arrest","volume":"256","author":"Harper","year":"1995","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34475-9","article-title":"Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review","volume":"32","author":"Jastrow","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.014","article-title":"Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment","volume":"201","author":"Bujold","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"952","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2008.00823.x","article-title":"Prospective comparison of delivery outcomes of vaginal births after cesarean section versus laparoscopic myomectomy","volume":"34","author":"Makino","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2008.04.008","article-title":"Prospective evaluation for the feasibility and safety of vaginal birth after laparoscopic myomectomy","volume":"15","author":"Kumakiri","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.12.047","article-title":"A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes","volume":"88","author":"Palomba","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02498.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean for women with three or more prior caesareans: assessing safety and success","volume":"117","author":"Cahill","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(96)90464-X","article-title":"Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus","volume":"347","author":"Rozenberg","year":"1996","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(99)00069-X","article-title":"Thickness of the lower uterine segment: its influence in the management of patients with previous cesarean sections","volume":"87","author":"Rozenberg","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.07.023","article-title":"Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section","volume":"87","author":"Sen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02390090","article-title":"Ultrasound examination of caesarean section scars during pregnancy","volume":"248","author":"Fukuda","year":"1991","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0096(199609)24:7<355::AID-JCU5>3.0.CO;2-A","article-title":"Sonographic evaluation of the wall thickness of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean section","volume":"24","author":"Tanik","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0450","first-page":"107","article-title":"[Transvaginal ultrasonic evaluation of the thickness of the section of the uterine wall in previous cesarean sections]","volume":"51","author":"Montanari","year":"1999","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1272\/jnms.67.352","article-title":"Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography","volume":"67","author":"Asakura","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Nihon Med Sch"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0460","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00620-1","article-title":"Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean","volume":"95","author":"Gotoh","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2004.23.11.1441","article-title":"Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"23","author":"Cheung","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033_bib0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30545-X","article-title":"Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section","volume":"27","author":"Cheung","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002712?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002712?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,1]],"date-time":"2024-05-01T07:01:31Z","timestamp":1714546891000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231512002712"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":94,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231512002712"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.033","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}}}