{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T12:25:23Z","timestamp":1763036723312},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]],"date-time":"2012-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354320000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,31]],"date-time":"2012-10-31T02:09:15Z","timestamp":1351649355000},"page":"817-821","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["\u00c9l\u00e9ments de la prise en charge anesth\u00e9sique en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"P.","family":"Diemunsch","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Pottecher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Chassard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.022","article-title":"Ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0: aspects \u00e9pid\u00e9miologiques","volume":"41","author":"Deneux-Tharaux","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0010","unstructured":"Rapport DREE 2010\u00a0: http:\/\/www.sante.gouv.fr\/l-enquete-nationale-perinatale.html."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.04.014","article-title":"Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995\u00a0to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys","volume":"41","author":"Blondel","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.036","article-title":"Rupture ut\u00e9rine\u00a0: pr\u00e9diction, diagnostic et prise en charge","volume":"41","author":"Parant","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820093a9","article-title":"Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States: 1979-2002","volume":"117","author":"Hawkins","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdfb11","article-title":"Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1998\u00a0to 2005","volume":"116","author":"Berg","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0035","unstructured":"Rapport CNEMM-INVS 2010. Bulletin \u00e9pid\u00e9miologique hebdomadaire (BEH) no\u00a02\u20133\u00a0du 19\u00a0janvier 2010. http:\/\/www.invs.sante.fr\/publications\/2010\/mortalite_maternelle\/rapport_mortalite_maternelle.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000197062.82735.f6","article-title":"Results of a well-defined protocol for a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"107","author":"Gonen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.031","article-title":"Quelles sont les recommandations d\u2019organisation et d\u2019information en cas de proposition de tentative de voie basse pour ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0?","volume":"41","author":"Gallot","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","article-title":"Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries","volume":"181","author":"Caughey","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2\u00a0versus VBAC-1\u00a0and repeat (third) caesarean sections","volume":"117","author":"Tahseen","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1097\/01.anes.0000264744.63275.10","article-title":"Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia","volume":"106","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1186\/1741-7015-7-20","article-title":"Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study","volume":"29","author":"Algert","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0b013e328329b071","article-title":"Anaesthetic practices for scheduled caesarean delivery: a 2005\u00a0French national survey","volume":"26","author":"Benhamou","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0080","first-page":"89","article-title":"Placenta previa\/accreta and prior cesarean section","volume":"66","author":"Clark","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70463-0","article-title":"Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta","volume":"177","author":"Miller","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0090","first-page":"1261","article-title":"Epidural anesthesia for five caesarian sections in patients with placenta previa percreta combined with placenta accreta","volume":"58","author":"Kamiya","year":"2009","journal-title":"Masui"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2011.10.021","article-title":"Impact of anesthetic methods on neonatal outcome in women receiving temporary balloon occlusion of the common iliac artery during cesarean section for placenta accreta","volume":"50","author":"Lan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obst Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2005.03.016","article-title":"H\u00e9morragies du post-partum\u00a0: recommandations du CNGOF pour la pratique clinique (d\u00e9cembre 2004)","volume":"33","author":"Goffinet","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1017\/S0265021507002712","article-title":"Recombinant factor VIIa in massive obstetric haemorrhage","volume":"25","author":"Bhuskute","year":"2008","journal-title":"EJA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0110","series-title":"Ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne. Protocoles en anesth\u00e9sie et analg\u00e9sie obst\u00e9tricale","author":"Chassard","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1646","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2011.05635.x","article-title":"Clinical interventions that increase the uptake and success of vaginal birth after caesarean section: a systematic review","volume":"67","author":"Catling-Paull","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.01.041","article-title":"Frequent epidural dosing as a marker for impending uterine rupture in patients who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"202","author":"Cahill","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0125","first-page":"691","article-title":"L\u2019anesth\u00e9siste-r\u00e9animateur doit-il exiger la pr\u00e9sence de l\u2019obst\u00e9tricien lors de la mise en place d\u2019une analg\u00e9sie p\u00e9ridurale durant le travail\u00a0?","volume":"29","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population- based cohort study","volume":"116","author":"Zwart","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0135","first-page":"313","article-title":"Risk factor for uterine rupture among women who attempt a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean: a case-control study","volume":"56","author":"Barger","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0140","first-page":"1","article-title":"Saving Mothers\u2019 Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-08. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom","volume":"118","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeg214","article-title":"Efficacy of augmentation of epidural analgesia for Caesarean section","volume":"91","author":"Tortosa","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002736?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512002736?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,19]],"date-time":"2018-11-19T18:31:01Z","timestamp":1542652261000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231512002736"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231512002736"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.035","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}}}