{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,3]],"date-time":"2022-04-03T15:59:32Z","timestamp":1649001572810},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,1]],"date-time":"2013-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1370044800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,1]],"date-time":"2013-03-01T08:44:43Z","timestamp":1362127483000},"page":"351-358","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Accouchement du si\u00e8ge et ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0: une situation obst\u00e9tricale particuli\u00e8re\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"42","author":[{"given":"A.","family":"Bourtembourg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Mangin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Ramanah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Maillet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Riethmuller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2009.11.016","article-title":"Prise en charge de l\u2019accouchement des patientes ayant un antecedent de c\u00e9sarienne","volume":"38","author":"Poulain","year":"2010","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0015","first-page":"191","article-title":"Voie d\u2019accouchement en cas de pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge:\u00a0? La position du Coll\u00e8ge National des Gyn\u00e9cologues et Obst\u00e9triciens Fran\u00e7ais","volume":"30","author":"Carbonne","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.039","article-title":"Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"194","author":"Glezerman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)80001-7","article-title":"Mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"77","author":"ACOG Committee Opinion","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200607000-00058","article-title":"Mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"108","author":"ACOG Committee Opinion","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.06.032","article-title":"The term breech presentation: Neonatal results and obstetric practices in France","volume":"125","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2007.09.004","article-title":"Influence de la voie d\u2019accouchement dans la pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge \u00e0 terme sur le score d\u2019Apgar et les transferts en n\u00e9onatologie: R\u00e9sultats de la prise en charge de 568\u00a0grossesses singleton dans une maternit\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise de niveau III","volume":"37","author":"Delotte","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(05)82954-0","article-title":"Pronostic obst\u00e9trical et n\u00e9onatal d\u2019une pr\u00e9sentation podalique de mauvais r\u00e9putation: le si\u00e8ge complet","volume":"34","author":"Broche","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2007.08.007","article-title":"Extraction par ventouse obst\u00e9tricale sur presentation du siege d\u00e9compl\u00e9t\u00e9","volume":"37","author":"Broche","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2008.03.011","article-title":"Pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge \u00e0 terme: facteurs pr\u00e9dictifs de c\u00e9sarienne en cours de travail","volume":"37","author":"Broche","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0065","first-page":"1","article-title":"Grossesse et ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel","volume":"5-016-D-20","author":"Cassignol","year":"2003","journal-title":"Encyclop\u00e9die m\u00e9dicale chirurgicale"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"115","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02498.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean for women with three or more prior caesareans: assessing safety and success","volume":"117","author":"Cahill","year":"2010","journal-title":"Brit J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.082","article-title":"Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?","volume":"192","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0085","series-title":"M\u00e9canique et techniques obst\u00e9tricales","author":"Schaal","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2008.08.012","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"142","author":"Sela","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90223-8","article-title":"Breech presentation after cesarean section: always a section?","volume":"161","author":"Ophir","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.03.015","article-title":"Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth","volume":"89","author":"SOGC clinical practice guidelines.","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.01.052","article-title":"Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37\u00a0weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry","volume":"202","author":"Wilmink","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512003365?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231512003365?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,18]],"date-time":"2018-10-18T10:00:34Z","timestamp":1539856834000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231512003365"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,6]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231512003365"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.10.013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,6]]}}}