{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:16:57Z","timestamp":1787066217256,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,1]],"date-time":"2016-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464739200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","em-consulte.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,1]],"date-time":"2015-10-01T18:17:21Z","timestamp":1443723441000},"page":"641-651","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Peut-on diminuer le taux de c\u00e9sarienne dans un CHU de niveau III\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Lembrouck","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Mottet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Bourtembourg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Ramanah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Riethmuller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0005","series-title":"Guidelines for monitoring the availability and use of obstetric services","author":"UNICEF","year":"1997"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Caughey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0015","series-title":"Better statistics for better health for pregnant women and their babies in 2004","author":"Euro-Peristat project","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0020","series-title":"European Perinatal health report. The health of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010","author":"Euro-Peristat project","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2010.01.002","article-title":"Donn\u00e9es 2007\u00a0de l\u2019extraction instrumentale en France\u00a0: r\u00e9sultats d\u2019une enqu\u00eate nationale aupr\u00e8s de l\u2019ensemble des centres hospitalo-universitaires","volume":"39","author":"Mangin","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2000.0156","article-title":"Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?","volume":"15","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0035","first-page":"444","article-title":"Les facteurs associ\u00e9s \u00e0 la pratique d\u2019une c\u00e9sarienne en France. R\u00e9sultats de l\u2019enqu\u00eate nationale p\u00e9rinatale de 1995","volume":"30","author":"Guihard","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.11.008","article-title":"La sant\u00e9 p\u00e9rinatale en France m\u00e9tropolitaine de 1995\u00a0\u00e0 2010. R\u00e9sultats des enqu\u00eates nationales p\u00e9rinatales","volume":"41","author":"Blondel","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2717","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.712567","article-title":"Comparative analysis of cesarean delivery rates over a 10-year period in a single Institution using 10-class classification","volume":"25","author":"Ciriello","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0050","first-page":"255","article-title":"Examining stratified cesarean section rates using Robson classification system at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital","volume":"11","author":"Amatya","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Nepal Health Res Counc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13199","article-title":"Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?","volume":"122","author":"Le Ray","year":"2015","journal-title":"Brit J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate","volume":"118","author":"Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0065","series-title":"C\u00e9sarienne\u00a0: cons\u00e9quences et indications [Internet]","author":"Coll\u00e8ge national des gyn\u00e9cologues et obst\u00e9triciens fran\u00e7ais","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0070","series-title":"Indications de la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e \u00e0 terme [Internet]","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30992-0","article-title":"Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system","volume":"35","author":"Kelly","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.05.011","article-title":"Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System","volume":"123","author":"Abdel-Aleem","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12608","article-title":"Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System","volume":"41","author":"Tan","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00005","article-title":"Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study","volume":"83","author":"Flamm","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0100","first-page":"737","article-title":"Les implications m\u00e9dico-l\u00e9gales de la c\u00e9sarienne \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de la jurisprudence","volume":"20","author":"Soutoul","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.05.009","article-title":"Analyse de la sinistralit\u00e9 en gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique\u00a0: exp\u00e9rience d\u2019un CHU en France","volume":"42","author":"Shojai","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015","article-title":"Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"170","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0120","first-page":"261","article-title":"La pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge \u00e0 terme\u00a0: \u00e9volution des pratiques en France et analyse des r\u00e9sultats n\u00e9onatals en fonction des pratiques obst\u00e9tricales, \u00e0 partir du R\u00e9seau Sentinelle AUDIPOG","volume":"31","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e97769","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0097769","article-title":"A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn\u2019t work and how to improve it","volume":"9","author":"Betr\u00e1n","year":"2014","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2008.03.011","article-title":"Pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge \u00e0 terme\u00a0: facteurs pr\u00e9dictifs de c\u00e9sarienne en cours du travail","volume":"37","author":"Broche","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.01.001","article-title":"La pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge singleton \u00e0 terme. \u00c0 propos d\u2019une s\u00e9rie continue de 418\u00a0cas","volume":"42","author":"Gannard-Pechin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.004","article-title":"Maternal outcomes at 2\u00a0years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Hannah","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000113625.29073.4c","article-title":"Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option","volume":"103","author":"Alarab","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.039","article-title":"Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"194","author":"Glezerman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0160","first-page":"CD000084","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation before term","author":"Hutton","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1214939","article-title":"A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"369","author":"Barrett","year":"2013","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-55","article-title":"Outcomes of non-vertex second twins, following vertex vaginal delivery of first twin: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on maternal and perinatal health","volume":"14","author":"Vogel","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318163c435","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery","volume":"111","author":"Schmitz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340601089594","article-title":"Attempted vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery in 195\u00a0breech first twin pregnancies","volume":"86","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.10.005","article-title":"L\u2019accouchement g\u00e9mellaire en cas de premier jumeau en pr\u00e9sentation podalique. \u00c9tude d\u2019une s\u00e9rie continue de 137\u00a0cas","volume":"41","author":"Bourtembourg","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0190","first-page":"CD000078","article-title":"Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons","volume":"9","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.458","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"188","author":"Johnson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318204521a","article-title":"The singleton, cephalic, nulliparous woman after 36\u00a0weeks of gestation: contribution to overall cesarean delivery rates","volume":"117","author":"Brennan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies","volume":"211","author":"Gibson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12328","article-title":"Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes","volume":"121","author":"Wood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Brit J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.130925","article-title":"Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"186","author":"Mishanina","year":"2014","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2014.08.003","article-title":"L\u2019introduction d\u2019un audit obst\u00e9trical quotidien\u00a0: une solution pour diminuer le taux de c\u00e9sarienne\u00a0?","volume":"44","author":"Lasnet","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"905","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12439","article-title":"Potential avoidability of planned cesarean sections in a French national database","volume":"93","author":"Coulm","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(92)90388-Y","article-title":"Appropriate technology in maternal and child health","volume":"37","author":"World Health Organization","year":"1992","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349409023447","article-title":"Technology use, cesarean section rates, and perinatal mortality at Danish maternity wards","volume":"73","author":"Lidegaard","year":"1994","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1303","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701644876","article-title":"The relationship of intrapartum and antepartum stillbirth rates to measures of obstetric care in developed and developing countries","volume":"86","author":"Goldenberg","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.06.005","article-title":"Comparaison des taux d\u2019acidose n\u00e9onatale s\u00e9v\u00e8re et analyse des pratiques obst\u00e9tricales dans deux maternit\u00e9s fran\u00e7aises","volume":"43","author":"Pommereau-Lathelize","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-78","article-title":"Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences","volume":"13","author":"Torloni","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231515002070?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231515002070?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,18]],"date-time":"2018-09-18T20:56:59Z","timestamp":1537304219000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231515002070"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231515002070"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Peut-on diminuer le taux de c\u00e9sarienne dans un CHU de niveau III\u00a0?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}