{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T19:35:12Z","timestamp":1791315312142,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,1]],"date-time":"2016-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1454284800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","em-consulte.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,1]],"date-time":"2015-10-01T21:46:49Z","timestamp":1443736009000},"page":"165-176","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":51,"title":["Courbes de croissance in utero ajust\u00e9es et non ajust\u00e9es adapt\u00e9es \u00e0 la population fran\u00e7aise. II\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Comparaison \u00e0 des courbes existantes et apport de l\u2019ajustement"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1025-910X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"A.","family":"Ego","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Prunet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Blondel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Kaminski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Goffinet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Zeitlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.09.010","article-title":"Retard de croissance intra-uterin\u00a0: recommandations pour la pratique clinique\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Introduction","volume":"42","author":"Carbonne","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.09.012","article-title":"D\u00e9finitions\u00a0: petit poids pour l\u2019\u00e2ge gestationnel et retard de croissance intra-uterin","volume":"42","author":"Ego","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"848","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03313.x","article-title":"Maternal and pathological pregnancy characteristics in customised birthweight centiles and identification of at-risk small-for-gestational-age infants: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"119","author":"Anderson","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.816","article-title":"Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study","volume":"194","author":"Ego","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F277","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2006.108621","article-title":"Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity","volume":"92","author":"Figueras","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1356","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02245.x","article-title":"The value of customised centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size","volume":"116","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01273.x","article-title":"The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality","volume":"114","author":"Zhang","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91342-6","article-title":"Customised antenatal growth charts","volume":"339","author":"Gardosi","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0255","article-title":"Courbes de croissance in utero ajust\u00e9es et non ajust\u00e9es adapt\u00e9es \u00e0 la population fran\u00e7aise. I\u00a0\u2013\u00a0M\u00e9thodes de construction","author":"Ego","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0260","series-title":"The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians Gynaecologists (RCOG)","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0265","series-title":"Fetal growth restriction","author":"American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0270","series-title":"Guideline for the management of suspected small for gestational age singleton pregnancies after 34\u00a0weeks of gestation","author":"The New Zealand Maternal Fetal Medicine Network","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30865-3","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management","volume":"35","author":"Lausman","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.034","article-title":"Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0285","series-title":"French national perinatal survey 2010","author":"Blondel","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0290","article-title":"Courbe d\u2019estimation de poids f\u0153tal 2014\u00a0par le Coll\u00e8ge fran\u00e7ais d\u2019\u00e9chographie f\u0153tale (CFEF)","author":"Massoud","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4019","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20\u201336\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range","volume":"29","author":"Salomon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0300","first-page":"391","article-title":"\u00c0 propos de la taille et du poids des nouveau-n\u00e9s \u00e0 la naissance","volume":"66","author":"Leroy","year":"1971","journal-title":"Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0305","first-page":"61","article-title":"Croissance f\u0153tale \u00e0 partir de l\u2019\u00e9tude AUDIPOG. I. \u00c9tablissement de courbes de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences","volume":"25","author":"Mamelle","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2008.01.009","article-title":"Poids des nouveau-n\u00e9s issus de grossesses uniques et non compliqu\u00e9es entre 28\u00a0et 42\u00a0semaines d\u2019am\u00e9norrh\u00e9e \u00e0 partir des donn\u00e9es du r\u00e9seau p\u00e9rinatal de la r\u00e9gion Bourgogne","volume":"37","author":"Rousseau","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2006.09.001","article-title":"Poids et taille de naissance\u00a0: courbes et \u00e9quations","volume":"36","author":"Salomon","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1007\/s00431-005-0045-4","article-title":"Identification of newborns with fetal growth restriction (FGR) in weight and\/or length based on constitutional growth potential","volume":"165","author":"Mamelle","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13148","article-title":"Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study","volume":"122","author":"Monier","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0330","series-title":"Grossesses \u00e0 risque\u00a0: orientation des femmes enceintes entre les maternit\u00e9s en vue de l\u2019accouchement. Recommandations de bonne pratique","author":"Haute Autorit\u00e9 de sant\u00e9","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1993.03020109.x","article-title":"An investigation of fetal growth using serial ultrasound data","volume":"3","author":"Gallivan","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-3782(90)90004-3","article-title":"Normal fetal growth evaluated by longitudinal ultrasound examinations","volume":"24","author":"Larsen","year":"1990","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14164.x","article-title":"Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights","volume":"85","author":"Marsal","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.06050340.x","article-title":"Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low-risk population","volume":"6","author":"Mongelli","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348609158374","article-title":"Intra-uterine weight curves obtained by ultrasound","volume":"65","author":"Persson","year":"1986","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07877.x","article-title":"Birthweight-for-gestational age charts based on early ultrasound estimation of gestational age","volume":"93","author":"Secher","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0365","first-page":"830","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards","volume":"108","author":"Clausson","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00656.x","article-title":"Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity","volume":"112","author":"McCowan","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00285-2","article-title":"Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards","volume":"88","author":"Mongelli","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e531","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.039","article-title":"Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist?","volume":"209","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.506566","article-title":"Association between pregnancy complications and small-for-gestational-age birth weight defined by customized fetal growth standard versus a population-based standard","volume":"24","author":"Odibo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0390","series-title":"Utilisation des courbes individualis\u00e9es de croissance f\u0153tale\u00a0: int\u00e9r\u00eat pour la pratique et la recherche.","first-page":"63","author":"Ego","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2010.01219.x","article-title":"Validation and refinement of an Australian customised birthweight model using routinely collected data","volume":"50","author":"Gibbons","year":"2010","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12041","article-title":"A test of agreement of customised birthweight models","volume":"27","author":"Gibbons","year":"2013","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2006.00623.x","article-title":"Customised birthweight: coefficients for an Australian population and validation of the model","volume":"46","author":"Pain","year":"2006","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.09.004","article-title":"Qualit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es p\u00e9rinatales issues du PMSI\u00a0: comparaison avec l\u2019\u00e9tat civil et l\u2019enqu\u00eate nationale p\u00e9rinatale 2010","volume":"43","author":"Quantin","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231515002136?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231515002136?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,18]],"date-time":"2018-09-18T20:53:47Z","timestamp":1537304027000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231515002136"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,2]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231515002136"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Courbes de croissance in utero ajust\u00e9es et non ajust\u00e9es adapt\u00e9es \u00e0 la population fran\u00e7aise. II\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Comparaison \u00e0 des courbes existantes et apport de l\u2019ajustement","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.009","name":"associatedlink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to the associated document"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}