{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,7]],"date-time":"2025-11-07T09:11:05Z","timestamp":1762506665323},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]],"date-time":"2015-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1448928000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","em-consulte.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,4]],"date-time":"2015-11-04T13:16:01Z","timestamp":1446642961000},"page":"1261-1271","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Modalit\u00e9s de l\u2019accouchement dans la pr\u00e9vention de la dystocie des \u00e9paules en cas de facteurs de risque identifi\u00e9s"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"T.","family":"Schmitz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.020","article-title":"Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review","volume":"193","author":"Chauhan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1461","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00702.x","article-title":"Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review","volume":"112","author":"Coomarasamy","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3999","article-title":"Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict macrosomia","volume":"29","author":"Mazouni","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6378","article-title":"Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term","volume":"34","author":"Kayem","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2010.29.2.225","article-title":"Sonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia: the consequences of false diagnosis","volume":"29","author":"Melamed","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.2337\/diacare.17.4.275","article-title":"Use of fetal ultrasound to select metabolic therapy for pregnancies complicated by mild gestational diabetes","volume":"17","author":"Buchanan","year":"1994","journal-title":"Diabetes Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1904","DOI":"10.2337\/diacare.24.11.1904","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial using glycemic plus fetal ultrasound parameters versus glycemic parameters to determine insulin therapy in gestational diabetes with fasting hyperglycemia","volume":"24","author":"Kjos","year":"2001","journal-title":"Diabetes Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1016\/S1262-3636(07)70114-3","article-title":"Flexible treatment of gestational diabetes modulated on ultrasound evaluation of intrauterine growth: a controlled randomized clinical trial","volume":"30","author":"Bonomo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Diabetes Metab"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.2337\/diacare.27.2.297","article-title":"A randomized trial evaluating a predominantly fetal growth-based strategy to guide management of gestational diabetes in Caucasian women","volume":"27","author":"Schaefer-Graf","year":"2004","journal-title":"Diabetes Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0355","first-page":"975","article-title":"Diagram for the prognosis of cephalo-pelvic disproportions. Application in 300\u00a0cases of pelvic contraction","volume":"4","author":"Magnin","year":"1975","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1186","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70129-2","article-title":"The fetal-pelvic index has minimal utility in predicting fetal-pelvic disproportion","volume":"179","author":"Ferguson","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1080\/01443619964201","article-title":"Has pelvimetry a role in current obstetric practice?","volume":"19","author":"Ikhena","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90508-1","article-title":"The predictability of labor outcome from a comparison of birth weight and X-ray pelvimetry","volume":"139","author":"Jagani","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S274","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(10)70053-3","article-title":"Delivery (timing, mode, glycemic control) in women with gestational diabetes","volume":"39","author":"Garabedian","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0380","first-page":"407","article-title":"Macrosomia. A proposed indication for primary cesarean section","volume":"52","author":"Parks","year":"1978","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1973.tb02132.x","article-title":"Brachial palsy","volume":"80","author":"Tan","year":"1973","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0390","first-page":"754","article-title":"Birth trauma. A five-year review of incidence and associated perinatal factors","volume":"41","author":"Perlow","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00484-0","article-title":"Associated factors in 1611\u00a0cases of brachial plexus injury","volume":"93","author":"Gilbert\u00a0WM","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.07.071","article-title":"Risk factors for brachial plexus injury with and without shoulder dystocia","volume":"194","author":"Gurewitsch","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.020","article-title":"Neonatal brachial plexus injury: comparison of incidence and antecedents between 2\u00a0decades","volume":"204","author":"Walsh","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90424-P","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000\u00a0grams be delivered by cesarean section?","volume":"165","author":"Langer","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107382","article-title":"Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery","volume":"183","author":"Gonen","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70524-1","article-title":"Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased caesarean deliveries","volume":"178","author":"Conway","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1480","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1996.03540180036030","article-title":"The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound","volume":"276","author":"Rouse","year":"1996","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70557-0","article-title":"Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a Faustian bargain?","volume":"181","author":"Rouse","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1203-3","article-title":"Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated withmacrosomia\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a decision analysis","volume":"16","author":"Culligan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0440","series-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No.\u00a022: Fetal Macrosomia","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0445","series-title":"Shoulder dystocia. Green-top Guideline No.\u00a042","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0450","series-title":"Recommandations de bonne pratique. Indications de la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e \u00e0 terme","author":"HAS","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0455","first-page":"492","article-title":"Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia","volume":"81","author":"Combs","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0460","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994404","article-title":"Influence of spontaneous or induced labor on delivering the macrosomic fetus","volume":"12","author":"Friesen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994344","article-title":"Induction of labor at 38\u00a0to 39\u00a0weeks of gestation reduces the incidence of shoulder dystocia in gestational diabetic patients class A2","volume":"13","author":"Lurie","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199703\/04)6:2<99::AID-MFM7>3.0.CO;2-K","article-title":"Labor induction with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal macrosomia","volume":"6","author":"Leaphart","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Maternal Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03248.x","article-title":"Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?","volume":"119","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-156","article-title":"Does induction\u00a0of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?","volume":"14","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0485","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00149-X","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study","volume":"89","author":"Gonen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0490","first-page":"CD000938","article-title":"Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia","volume":"2","author":"Irion","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02321-9","article-title":"Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review","volume":"100","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0500","series-title":"D\u00e9clenchement artificiel du travail \u00e0 partir de 37\u00a0semaines d\u2019am\u00e9norrh\u00e9e","author":"HAS","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S338","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(10)70058-2","article-title":"Le diab\u00e8te gestationnel. Texte des recommandations","volume":"39","author":"CNGOF","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0510","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8","article-title":"Induction of labour or expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0515","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2557","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62302-3","article-title":"Should pregnancies be induced for impeding macrosomia?","volume":"385","author":"Caughey","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0520","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816499f4","article-title":"Late-preterm birth: does the changing obstetric paradigm alter the epidemiology of respiratory complications?","volume":"111","author":"Yoder","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0525","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0803267","article-title":"Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes","volume":"360","author":"Tita","year":"2009","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0530","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39405.539282.BE","article-title":"Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study","volume":"336","author":"Hansen","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0535","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00486-1","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic maneuvers to reduce head-to-body delivery time in patients at risk for shoulder dystocia","volume":"102","author":"Beall","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0540","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.024","article-title":"Randomized trial of McRoberts versus lithotomy positioning to decrease the force that is applied to the fetus during delivery","volume":"191","author":"Poggi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0545","first-page":"CD005543","article-title":"Intrapartum interventions for preventing shoulder dystocia","volume":"4","author":"Athukorala","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0550","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00564.x","article-title":"Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery","volume":"112","author":"Youssef","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0555","series-title":"Operative Vaginal Delivery: use of forceps and vacuum extractors for operative vaginal delivery","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0560","series-title":"Operative Vaginal Delivery. Guideline No.\u00a026","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0565","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S188","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(08)74757-4","article-title":"Indications and prerequisites for operative vaginal delivery: when, how and where?","volume":"37","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0570","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13193.x","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia: what happens at the next delivery?","volume":"101","author":"Smith","year":"1994","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0575","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00099-D","article-title":"Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia","volume":"86","author":"Baskett","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0580","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1369","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90464-6","article-title":"Reucurrence rate of shoulder dystocia","volume":"172","author":"Lewis","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0585","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S96","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(01)80131-9","article-title":"Recurrent shoulder dsytocia: how high is the risk?","volume":"185","author":"Ouzounian","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0590","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1427","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115117","article-title":"How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia","volume":"184","author":"Ginsberg","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0595","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050701563826","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia and the next delivery: outcomes and management","volume":"20","author":"Mehta","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0600","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.09.050","article-title":"Risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia, Washington state, 1987\u20132004","volume":"198","author":"Moore","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0605","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802415614","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia: what is the risk of recurrence?","volume":"87","author":"Usta","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051_bib0305","first-page":"515","article-title":"Recurrent shoulder dystocia: analysis of incidence and risk factors","volume":"29","author":"Ouzounian","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231515002914?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231515002914?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,18]],"date-time":"2018-09-18T02:26:56Z","timestamp":1537237616000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231515002914"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231515002914"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Modalit\u00e9s de l\u2019accouchement dans la pr\u00e9vention de la dystocie des \u00e9paules en cas de facteurs de risque identifi\u00e9s","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.09.051","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}