{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T11:17:05Z","timestamp":1773227825411,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,1]],"date-time":"2016-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477958400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","em-consulte.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,19]],"date-time":"2016-10-19T21:46:14Z","timestamp":1476913574000},"page":"1037-1044","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["En cas de macrosomie f\u0153tale, la meilleure strat\u00e9gie est le d\u00e9clenchement artificiel du travail \u00e0 38\u00a0semaines d\u2019am\u00e9norrh\u00e9e"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8566-015X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"P.","family":"Rozenberg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1953","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.674990","article-title":"Increased composite maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with ultrasonographically suspected fetal macrosomia","volume":"25","author":"King","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.12.036","article-title":"Obstetric and neonatal risks among extremely macrosomic babies and their mothers","volume":"204","author":"Vidarsdottir","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1480","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1996.03540180036030","article-title":"The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound","volume":"276","author":"Rouse","year":"1996","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0020","first-page":"1045","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists","volume":"100","author":"ACOG","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.12.005","article-title":"How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia","volume":"198","author":"Zhang","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.07.022","article-title":"Neonatal respiratory morbidity in the early term delivery","volume":"207","author":"Ghartey","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1064","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2008-2407","article-title":"Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery","volume":"123","author":"De Luca","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0040","first-page":"492","article-title":"Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia","volume":"81","author":"Combs","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994404","article-title":"Influence of spontaneous or induced labor on delivering the macrosomic fetus","volume":"12","author":"Friesen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199703\/04)6:2<99::AID-MFM7>3.0.CO;2-K","article-title":"Labor induction with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal macrosomia","volume":"6","author":"Leaphart","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0055","first-page":"CD000938","article-title":"Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia","volume":"2","author":"Irion","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00149-X","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study","volume":"89","author":"Gonen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90803-X","article-title":"A prospective randomized trial of induction versus expectant management in nondiabetic pregnancies with fetal macrosomia","volume":"172","author":"Tey","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03248.x","article-title":"Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?","volume":"119","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00590-5","article-title":"Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034\u00a0parturients","volume":"91","author":"Chauhan","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6378","article-title":"Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term","volume":"34","author":"Kayem","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0090","first-page":"639","article-title":"Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements","volume":"95","author":"Chauhan","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870150604","article-title":"Influence of fetal growth patterns on sonographic estimation of fetal weight","volume":"15","author":"Simon","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.001","article-title":"Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect","volume":"191","author":"Luthy","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0110","first-page":"600","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women","volume":"94","author":"Seyb","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0115","first-page":"235","article-title":"Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes","volume":"50","author":"Glantz","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2838","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Darney","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies","volume":"211","author":"Gibson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.130925","article-title":"Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"186","author":"Mishanina","year":"2014","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1509117","article-title":"Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35\u00a0years of age or older","volume":"374","author":"Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231516301028?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0368231516301028?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,7]],"date-time":"2018-09-07T07:52:18Z","timestamp":1536306738000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0368231516301028"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368231516301028"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-2315"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-2315","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"En cas de macrosomie f\u0153tale, la meilleure strat\u00e9gie est le d\u00e9clenchement artificiel du travail \u00e0 38\u00a0semaines d\u2019am\u00e9norrh\u00e9e","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal de Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique et Biologie de la Reproduction","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}