{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T13:10:35Z","timestamp":1771333835466,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jmig.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,6,19]],"date-time":"2011-06-19T09:03:38Z","timestamp":1308474218000},"page":"455-461","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":54,"title":["Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Fabio","family":"Ghezzi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Antonella","family":"Cromi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gabriele","family":"Siesto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stefano","family":"Uccella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luigi","family":"Boni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maurizio","family":"Serati","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pierfrancesco","family":"Bolis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(97)00177-2","article-title":"Minilaparoscopy in gynecology","volume":"76","author":"Bruhat","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2009.04945.x","article-title":"Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis","volume":"79","author":"Sajid","year":"2009","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2005.09.002","article-title":"Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial","volume":"12","author":"Ghezzi","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2153","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-008-0010-1","article-title":"Needlescopic hysterectomy: incorporation of 3-mm instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"22","author":"Ghezzi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2009.01.015","article-title":"Microlaparoscopy: a further development of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer staging - initial experience","volume":"113","author":"Ghezzi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib6","first-page":"613","article-title":"Testing for departures from Normality","volume":"60","author":"D\u2019Agostino","year":"1973","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.026","article-title":"Postoperative pain after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a randomized trial","volume":"203","author":"Ghezzi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pmn.2006.09.001","article-title":"(2006) Determination of clinically meaningful levels of pain reduction in patients experiencing acute postoperative pain","volume":"7","author":"Sloman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Pain Manag Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03193146","article-title":"(2007) G\u2217Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences","volume":"39","author":"Faul","year":"2007","journal-title":"Behav Res Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-001-9026-5","article-title":"Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial","volume":"16","author":"Bisgaard","year":"2002","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.140.12.1178","article-title":"Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial","volume":"140","author":"Novitsky","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1007\/s004640020014","article-title":"Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind controlled study","volume":"14","author":"Bisgaard","year":"2000","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib13","first-page":"138","article-title":"Post-operative pain in needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial","volume":"46","author":"Look","year":"2001","journal-title":"J R Coll Surg Edinb"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s004640020063","article-title":"Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results\u00a0after laparoscopic vs. microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"14","author":"Schwenk","year":"2000","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.138.9.1017","article-title":"Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study","volume":"138","author":"Huang","year":"2003","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1437","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-002-6351-3","article-title":"Is minisite cholecystectomy less traumatic? Prospective randomized study comparing minisite and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomies","volume":"26","author":"Alponat","year":"2002","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.2001.01636.x","article-title":"Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"88","author":"Cheah","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sle.0000160290.78288.f4","article-title":"Comparison of needlescopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"15","author":"Lau","year":"2005","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1097\/00129689-200110000-00004","article-title":"Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study","volume":"11","author":"Huang","year":"2001","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.2000.01374.x","article-title":"Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"87","author":"Wills","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3959(00)00406-1","article-title":"Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"90","author":"Bisgaard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib22","first-page":"710","article-title":"Predicting postoperative analgesia outcomes: NNT league tables or procedure-specific evidence?","volume":"94","author":"Gray","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br\u00a0J\u00a0Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340009169217","article-title":"Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: 6a randomized controlled study","volume":"79","author":"H\u00e4rkki-Sir\u00e9n","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/s004640000302","article-title":"Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients","volume":"15","author":"Leggett","year":"2001","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1089\/10926420152389332","article-title":"Omental herniation through a 3-mm umbilical trocar site: unmasking a hidden umbilical hernia","volume":"11","author":"Bergemann","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.20.133","article-title":"Omental herniation through a 3-mm umbilical trocar site","volume":"20","author":"Yee","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S44","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(96)80285-4","article-title":"Decreased performance of skilled laparoscopic surgeons at microlaparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy","volume":"3","author":"Rosser","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1097\/00019509-199806000-00002","article-title":"Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments","volume":"8","author":"Gagner","year":"1998","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1007\/s004649900632","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine-caliber instruments: smaller is not necessarily better","volume":"12","author":"Berci","year":"1998","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1208","DOI":"10.1007\/s004640080024","article-title":"Needlescopic surgery: a logical evolution from conventional laparoscopic surgery","volume":"15","author":"Mamazza","year":"2001","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib31","first-page":"189","article-title":"Desertification of the peritoneum by thin-film evaporation during laparoscopy","volume":"7","author":"Ott","year":"2003","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-003-8238-2","article-title":"Pneumoperitoneum and peritoneal surface changes: a review","volume":"18","author":"Neuhaus","year":"2004","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465011002020?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465011002020?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T09:33:18Z","timestamp":1761557598000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465011002020"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465011002020"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.03.019","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}