{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T15:53:50Z","timestamp":1767887630614,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,1]],"date-time":"2011-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1320105600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,1]],"date-time":"2011-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1320105600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jmig.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,27]],"date-time":"2011-10-27T08:13:08Z","timestamp":1319703188000},"page":"716-719","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["Barbed vs Standard Suture: Randomized Single-Blinded Comparison of Adhesion Formation and Ease of Use in an Animal Model"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Jon I.","family":"Einarsson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anna T.","family":"Grazul-Bilska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kimberly A.","family":"Vonnahme","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib1","unstructured":"Leung JC. Barbed suture technology: recent advances. In: Proceedings of the US Medical Textiles Conference 2004. Pittsburgh, PA; October 26\u201327, 2004:62\u201380."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1001\/archderm.143.7.869","article-title":"Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers","volume":"143","author":"Rashid","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch Dermatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib3","unstructured":"Rodeheaver GT, Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, et\u00a0al. Barbed sutures for wound closure: in\u00a0vivo wound security, tissue compatibility and cosmesis measurements. Transaction 229. In: Transactions of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials. Memphis, TN; April 27\u201330, 2004:232."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2008.06.004","article-title":"The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"15","author":"Greenberg","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1175","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.9913","article-title":"Bidirectional-barbed sutured knotless running anastomosis v classic Van Velthoven suturing in a model system","volume":"21","author":"Moran","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.10.003","article-title":"Use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: evaluation of perioperative outcomes, safety, and efficacy","volume":"18","author":"Einarsson","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.4293\/108680810X12924466007566","article-title":"Bidirectional barbed suture: an evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes","volume":"14","author":"Einarsson","year":"2010","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1348-1","article-title":"Small bowel volvulus following peritoneal closure using absorbable knotless device during laparoscopic sacral colpopexy [published online ahead of print January 6, 2011]","volume":"22","author":"Thubert","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1590\/S0102-86502010000100009","article-title":"Experimental model of the formation of pelvic adhesions by videolaparoscopic in female rabbits","volume":"25","author":"Balbinotto","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Cir Bras"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.09.011","article-title":"Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas","volume":"83","author":"Hurst","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.11.006","article-title":"Pregnancy and outcome of uterine allotransplantation and assisted reproduction in sheep","volume":"18","author":"Ramirez","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465011003402?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465011003402?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T09:33:57Z","timestamp":1761557637000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465011003402"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,11]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465011003402"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Barbed vs Standard Suture: Randomized Single-Blinded Comparison of Adhesion Formation and Ease of Use in an Animal Model","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.06.018","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}