{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T03:30:16Z","timestamp":1777087816258,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,1]],"date-time":"2015-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1425168000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["jmig.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,11]],"date-time":"2014-12-11T11:49:53Z","timestamp":1418298593000},"page":"342-352","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization Versus Interval Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation: A Comparative Effectiveness Review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Myrsini","family":"Ouzounelli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nancy L.","family":"Reaven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008","volume":"23","author":"Mosher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Vital Health Stat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000426425.33845.b2","article-title":"Benefits and risks of sterilization","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318224d4d2","article-title":"Reliability of laparoscopic compared with hysteroscopic sterilization at one year: a decision analysis","volume":"118","author":"Gariepy","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib4","first-page":"1","article-title":"Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006\u20132010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995","volume":"60","author":"Jones","year":"2012","journal-title":"Nat Health Stat Report"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.12.012","article-title":"The effect of tubal sterilisation through electrocoagulation on the ovarian reserve","volume":"80","author":"Goynumer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2006.04.002","article-title":"Essure: hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"51","author":"Hastings-Tolsma","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1248134","article-title":"Transervical sterilization","volume":"28","author":"Castano","year":"2010","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.3109\/13625181003597037","article-title":"State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: V. female sterilization","volume":"15","author":"Beerthuizen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.02.009","article-title":"Essure: a review six years later","volume":"16","author":"Connor","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.09.016","article-title":"Hysteroscopic sterilization: 10-year retrospective analysis of worldwide pregnancy reports","volume":"21","author":"Munro","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70658-0","article-title":"The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization","volume":"174","author":"Peterson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318194ecc6","article-title":"Failure and regret after laparoscopic Filshie clip sterilization under local anesthetic","volume":"113","author":"Mackenzie","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1522","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00726.x","article-title":"Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation","volume":"112","author":"Duffy","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg256","article-title":"Hysteroscopic sterilization using a microinsert device: results of a multicenter phase II study","volume":"18","author":"Kerin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00373-9","article-title":"Microinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"102","author":"Cooper","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2005.11.010","article-title":"Prospective analysis of office-based hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"13","author":"Levie","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.07.994","article-title":"Analysis of pain and satisfaction with office-based hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"94","author":"Levie","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.06.047","article-title":"A comparison of novice and experienced physicians performing hysteroscopic sterilization: an analysis of an FDA-mandated trial","volume":"96","author":"Levie","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.4065\/83.4.431","article-title":"Hysteroscopic sterilization in women with severe cardiac disease: experience at a tertiary center","volume":"83","author":"Famuyide","year":"2008","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01351.x","article-title":"The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"114","author":"Sinha","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2008.03.004","article-title":"Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population","volume":"15","author":"Shavell","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.09.063","article-title":"Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicebter study of 495 patients","volume":"93","author":"Panel","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.12.032","article-title":"Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting","volume":"82","author":"Ubeda","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1182","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.08.007","article-title":"Satisfaction and tolerance with office hysteroscopic tubal sterilisation","volume":"90","author":"Arjona","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60056-4","article-title":"Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation: results based on utilizing a new coil catheter delivery system","volume":"11","author":"Kerin","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01354.x","article-title":"Success rate and patient satisfaction with the Essure sterilization in an outpatient setting: a prospective study of 857 women","volume":"114","author":"Mino","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.05.014","article-title":"A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room","volume":"13","author":"Nichols","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib28","first-page":"541","article-title":"Failed female sterilization. A review of pathogenesis and subsequent contraceptive options","volume":"54","author":"Awonuga","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"930.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.08.013","article-title":"Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement","volume":"91","author":"Gerritse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2011.30.6.803","article-title":"Clinical experience with contrast infusion sonography as an Essure confirmation test","volume":"30","author":"Connor","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.019","article-title":"Improving hysterosalpingogram confirmatory test follow-up after Essure hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"81","author":"Guiahi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib32","first-page":"717","article-title":"Laparoscopic pomeroy tubal ligation: a comparison with tubal cauterization in a teaching hospital","volume":"49","author":"Robinson","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180801920180","article-title":"Training of residents in laparoscopic tubal sterilization: long-term failure rates","volume":"13","author":"Rackow","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Contacept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500292205","article-title":"Laparoscopic laser sterilisation: an alternative option","volume":"25","author":"Erian","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.02.080","article-title":"Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: a systematic review of the Essure system","volume":"94","author":"Hurskainen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.11.007","article-title":"A summary of reported pregnancies after hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"14","author":"Levy","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.07.026","article-title":"Contemporary hysteroscopic methods for female sterilization","volume":"108","author":"Smith","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.10.005","article-title":"Unintended pregnancies after Essure sterilizations in the Netherlands","volume":"93","author":"Veersema","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib39","first-page":"30","article-title":"Randomized comparison between two microlaparoscopic techniques for partial salpingectomy","volume":"9","author":"Siegle","year":"2005","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.10.006","article-title":"Oral analgesia vs intravenous conscious sedation during Essure microinsert sterilization procedure: randomized double bind controlled trial","volume":"18","author":"Thiel","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.07.002","article-title":"Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization with Essure intratubal devices: a case-control prospective with inert local anesthesia or without anesthesia","volume":"138","author":"Lopes","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib42","first-page":"647","article-title":"Benefits and risks of sterilization","volume":"102","year":"2003","journal-title":"ACOG Pract Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0403200414","article-title":"The use of the laryngeal mask in gynaecological laparoscopy","volume":"32","author":"Viira","year":"2004","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x","article-title":"Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT","volume":"54","author":"Abdi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2007.05142.x","article-title":"A study of airway management using ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery","volume":"62","author":"Hohlrieder","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib46","first-page":"205","article-title":"Cost analysis of three anesthetic regimens under auditory evoked potentials monitoring in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery","volume":"45","author":"Horng","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Anesthesiol Taiwan"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03021826","article-title":"Advantages of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies","volume":"53","author":"Miller","year":"2006","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2010.02327.x","article-title":"Predicted effect site concentration of propofol and sufentanil for gynecological laparoscopic surgery","volume":"55","author":"Jung","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib49","first-page":"311","article-title":"Daycase laparoscopic gynaecological procedures-current trends in anesthetic management","volume":"12","author":"Onajin-Obembe","year":"2009","journal-title":"Niger J Clin Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.76660","article-title":"Ambulatory laparoscopic tubal ligation: a comparison of general anesthesia with local anesthesia and sedation","volume":"27","author":"Gupta","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Anaesthiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib51","first-page":"77","article-title":"Dexmedetomidine as a substitute for remifentanil in ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopic surgery","volume":"30","author":"Salman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib52","series-title":"Male and female sterilization. Evidence-based clinical guideline","year":"2004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000298621.98372.62","article-title":"Sterilization","volume":"111","author":"Peterson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.016","article-title":"Tubal sterilization: complications of laparoscopy and mini-laparotomy","volume":"134","author":"Huber","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2010.01.005","article-title":"A prospective cohort study of menstrual symptoms and morbidity over 15 years following laparoscopic Filshie clip sterilization","volume":"65","author":"MacKenzie","year":"2010","journal-title":"Maturitas"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.07.007","article-title":"Changes in menstrual pattern and ovarian function following bipolar electrocauterization of the fallopian tubes for voluntary surgical contraception","volume":"73","author":"Dede","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1659","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.326125501","article-title":"Imaging of mechanical tubal occlusion devices and potential complications","volume":"32","author":"Guelfguat","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03292.x","article-title":"Complications of hysteroscopic Essure sterilization: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single center","volume":"119","author":"Povedano","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002_bib59","series-title":"Essure [instructions for use]","year":"2013"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465014015933?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465014015933?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,24]],"date-time":"2022-04-24T06:12:17Z","timestamp":1650780737000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465014015933"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465014015933"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization Versus Interval Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation: A Comparative Effectiveness Review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.12.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}