{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T03:30:28Z","timestamp":1777087828510,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,1]],"date-time":"2016-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477958400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","jmig.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,31]],"date-time":"2016-08-31T02:46:12Z","timestamp":1472611572000},"page":"1158-1162","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Does Essure Cause Significant De Novo Pain? A Retrospective Review of Indications for Second Surgeries After Essure Placement"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Huse","family":"Kamencic","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1183-1788","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luke","family":"Thiel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Erwin","family":"Karreman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Thiel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01351.x","article-title":"The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"114","author":"Sinha","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib2","first-page":"207","article-title":"Efficacy, safety and patient acceptability of the Essure procedure","volume":"5","author":"Lessard","year":"2011","journal-title":"Patient Prefer Adher"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03292.x","article-title":"Complications of hysteroscopic Essure sterilization: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single center","volume":"119","author":"Povedano","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.05.006","article-title":"Analysis of adverse events with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization reported to the manufacturer and user facility device experience database","volume":"20","author":"Al-Safi","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib5","unstructured":"Brockovich E. Tell your story. Available at: www.Essureprocedure.net. Accessed January 21, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.02.009","article-title":"Essure: a review six years later","volume":"16","author":"Connor","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.08.022","article-title":"Dislodged Essure microinsert","volume":"80","author":"Booker","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.03.022","article-title":"Essure perforation and chronic pelvic pain","volume":"18","author":"Moawad","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0b013e31827cd32e","article-title":"Nickel-induced systemic contact dermatitis and intratubal implants: the baboon syndrome revisited","volume":"24","author":"Bibas","year":"2013","journal-title":"Dermatitis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib10","unstructured":"Essure permanent birth control\u2014FDA review of reported problems. Available at: www.fda.gov\/MedicalDevices\/ProductsandMedicalProcedures. Accessed September 25,\u00a02015."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib11","unstructured":"Bayer Healthcare LLC. Essure permanent birth control Instructions for se. Available at: http:\/\/www.hcp.essure-us.com\/assets\/pdf\/Link%20Essure%20IFU.pdf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2014.920795","article-title":"Essure and chronic pelvic pain: a population-based cohort","volume":"34","author":"Arjona","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00053-7","article-title":"Tubal sterilization and long-term risk of hysterectomy: findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization. The U.S. Collaboratvie Review of Sterilization Working Group","volume":"89","author":"Hills","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib14","series-title":"Health Indicators 2009","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib15","first-page":"1","article-title":"Prevalence of self-reported hysterectomy among Canadian women, 2000\/2001\u20132008","volume":"34","author":"Stakiewicz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Chronic Dis Injur Canada"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)02858-8","article-title":"Tissue response to the STOP microcoil transcervical permanent contraceptive device: results from a prehysterectomy study","volume":"76","author":"Valle","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00726.x","article-title":"Female sterilization: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilization","volume":"112","author":"Duffy","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.018","article-title":"Midurethral slings: evidence-based medicine vs the medicolegal system","volume":"214","author":"Nager","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.06.007","article-title":"Incidence and risk factors for chronic pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"22","author":"Yunker","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465016310147?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465016310147?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,8]],"date-time":"2018-09-08T18:22:31Z","timestamp":1536430951000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465016310147"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465016310147"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Does Essure Cause Significant De Novo Pain? A Retrospective Review of Indications for Second Surgeries After Essure Placement","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.823","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 AAGL. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}