{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T18:54:30Z","timestamp":1786992870100,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,1]],"date-time":"2017-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1498867200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","jmig.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,28]],"date-time":"2017-04-28T16:04:04Z","timestamp":1493395444000},"page":"833-836","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["In-office Hysteroscopic Extraction of Intrauterine Devices in Pregnant Patients Who Underwent Prior Ultrasound-guided Extraction Failure"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Shlomo B.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4674-8626","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jerome","family":"Bouaziz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8748-0427","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexandra","family":"Bar-On","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eyal","family":"Schiff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Motti","family":"Goldenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roy","family":"Mashiach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.10.787","article-title":"Contraceptive efficacy of intrauterine devices","volume":"198","author":"Thonneau","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.031","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome in women with an intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"201","author":"Ganer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027","article-title":"Controversies in family planning: desired pregnancy, IUD in situ and no strings visible","volume":"88","author":"Owen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.07.001","article-title":"IUD use in adolescent mothers: retention, failure and reasons for discontinuation","volume":"85","author":"Teal","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.07.006","article-title":"The safety of intrauterine devices in breastfeeding women: a systematic review","volume":"94","author":"Berry-Bibee","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes with an IUD in situ: a systematic review","volume":"85","author":"Brahmi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02389602","article-title":"Pregnancy with an intrauterine device in situ and preterm delivery","volume":"252","author":"Chaim","year":"1992","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.07.021","article-title":"Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system","volume":"190","author":"Backman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.03.004","article-title":"Ultrasound-guided hysteroscopy to remove a levonorgestrel intrauterine system in early pregnancy","volume":"86","author":"McCarthy","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.002","article-title":"Outcome of intrauterine pregnancies with intrauterine device in place and effects of device location on prognosis","volume":"89","author":"Ozgu-Erdinc","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1973","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.074","article-title":"Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae","volume":"90","author":"Pabuccu","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999306","article-title":"Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy","volume":"9","author":"Sachs","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00304-9","article-title":"Current opinion: consensus statement on intrauterine contraception","volume":"65","author":"Rivera","year":"2002","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1036","article-title":"Lost intrauterine devices during pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcome after ultrasound-guided extraction. An analysis of 82 cases","volume":"23","author":"Schiesser","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2009.133","article-title":"The prognosis of pregnancy conceived despite the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD)","volume":"38","author":"Kim","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib16","first-page":"S1","article-title":"The new WHO contraceptive guidelines","volume":"107S2","author":"Peterson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J\u00a0Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib17","first-page":"1","article-title":"U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013: adapted from the World Health Organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition","volume":"62","author":"Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)","year":"2013","journal-title":"MMWR Recomm Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2001.030","article-title":"The use of first trimester ultrasound in routine practice","volume":"29","author":"Sen","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.139.3.521","article-title":"Continuous sonographic monitoring of IUD extraction during pregnancy: preliminary report","volume":"139","author":"Shalev","year":"1982","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(75)90027-X","article-title":"Hysteroscopy in the localization and removal of intrauterine devices with \u201cmissing strings.\u201d","volume":"11","author":"Valle","year":"1975","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(92)90105-3","article-title":"Removal of intrauterine devices with missing tails during early pregnancy","volume":"45","author":"Assaf","year":"1992","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.1993.9.195","article-title":"Outcome of removal of intrauterine devices with flexible hysteroscopy in early pregnancy","volume":"9","author":"Lin","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.11.004","article-title":"Hysteroscopy in pregnancy-related conditions: descriptive analysis in 273 patients","volume":"21","author":"P\u00e9rez-Medina","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465017302649?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465017302649?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,2]],"date-time":"2018-09-02T03:55:11Z","timestamp":1535860511000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465017302649"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465017302649"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"In-office Hysteroscopic Extraction of Intrauterine Devices in Pregnant Patients Who Underwent Prior Ultrasound-guided Extraction Failure","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.03.021","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 AAGL. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}