{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T13:24:23Z","timestamp":1768915463793,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,1]],"date-time":"2018-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525132800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["81370688"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["81370688"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["81671417"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["81671417"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Shanghai Science and Technology Development Medical Guide Project","award":["17411961000"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["17411961000"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.com.au","jmig.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,6]],"date-time":"2017-12-06T04:41:54Z","timestamp":1512535314000},"page":"724-729","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Risk Factors for Unsuccessful Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy: A Comparative Study of Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy (Pipelle) and Diagnostic Dilation and Curettage"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Bingying","family":"Xie","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cuifeng","family":"Qian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bingyi","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chengcheng","family":"Ning","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiaoying","family":"Yao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yan","family":"Du","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yue","family":"Shi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xuezhen","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5493-1500","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Xiaojun","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2012.719944","article-title":"Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling","volume":"32","author":"Kazandi","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.026","article-title":"The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis","volume":"134","author":"Polena","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.09.035","article-title":"Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling for the detection of high-grade endometrial tumors","volume":"196","author":"Huang","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.12.017","article-title":"Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma","volume":"113","author":"Leitao","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00105-Z","article-title":"Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy in predicting final histopathologic grade in endometrial cancer","volume":"86","author":"Larson","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.10.882","article-title":"Endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma with a background of complex atypical hyperplasia and final hysterectomy pathology","volume":"202","author":"Leitao","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.07.033","article-title":"Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma","volume":"111","author":"Leitao","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000362","article-title":"Predicting painful or difficult intrauterine device insertion in nulligravid women","volume":"124","author":"Kaislasuo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0050","series-title":"Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract","author":"Kurman","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2515","DOI":"10.1007\/s00432-016-2215-3","article-title":"Endometrial sampling devices for early diagnosis of endometrial lesions","volume":"142","author":"Du","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cancer Res Clin Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1028","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01773.x","article-title":"Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling","volume":"115","author":"Williams","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.5603\/GP.2016.0044","article-title":"Assessment of the usefulness of pipelle biopsy in gynecological diagnostics","volume":"87","author":"Piatek","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ginekol Polska"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2016.11.041","article-title":"Patient and provider factors associated with endometrial Pipelle sampling failure","volume":"144","author":"Adambekov","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1765","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1765::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-F","article-title":"The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis","volume":"89","author":"Dijkhuizen","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0080","first-page":"492","article-title":"The safety and acceptability of Pipelle endometrial sampling in premenopausal women in comparison to postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"68","author":"Rezk","year":"2016","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1136\/jclinpath-2014-202210","article-title":"Endometrial biopsy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: inadequate and unassessable categorisation is not clinically relevant","volume":"67","author":"Ewies","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Clin Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1136\/jclinpath-2017-204338","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial biopsy in relation to the amount of tissue","volume":"70","author":"Reijnen","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.5152\/jtgga.2013.01","article-title":"Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"14","author":"Abdelazim","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Turk German Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90884-4","article-title":"A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator","volume":"168","author":"Rodriguez","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2016.08.004","article-title":"Preoperative diagnosis of tumor grade and type in endometrial cancer by pipelle sampling and hysteroscopy: results of a French study","volume":"25","author":"Phelippeau","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f74864","article-title":"The oncogenic potential of endometrial polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"116","author":"Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465017313250?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465017313250?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,25]],"date-time":"2018-08-25T07:53:40Z","timestamp":1535183620000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465017313250"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465017313250"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Risk Factors for Unsuccessful Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy: A Comparative Study of Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy (Pipelle) and Diagnostic Dilation and Curettage","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.11.018","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AAGL.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}