{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T19:38:45Z","timestamp":1793302725977,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]],"date-time":"2022-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1656633600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]],"date-time":"2022-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1656633600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jmig.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,7]],"date-time":"2022-05-07T02:35:22Z","timestamp":1651890922000},"page":"832-839","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Knotless Barbed versus Conventional Suture for Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Hedi Benyamini","family":"Raischer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Manal","family":"Massalha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rula","family":"Iskander","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ido","family":"Izhaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3603-8452","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Raed","family":"Salim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13284","article-title":"Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study","volume":"123","author":"Macfarlane","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0002","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births in the United States, 2017","volume":"318","author":"Martin","year":"2018","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0003","article-title":"Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section","volume":"7","author":"Dodd","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0004","first-page":"107","article-title":"Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"6","author":"Greenberg","year":"2013","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0005","first-page":"51","article-title":"Bidirectional barbed sutures for wound closure: evolution and applications","volume":"1","author":"Paul","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Am Col Certif Wound Spec"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.01.002","article-title":"Decreased incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence after laparoscopic closure with bidirectional barbed suture","volume":"18","author":"Siedhoff","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.015","article-title":"Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure","volume":"20","author":"Einarsson","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.09.014","article-title":"The use of barbed suture for laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Tulandi","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1388368","article-title":"Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial","volume":"32","author":"Zayed","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0010","first-page":"343","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery","volume":"218","author":"Peleg","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1571","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.01.011","article-title":"Barbed versus conventional suture for uterine repair during caesarean section: a randomized controlled study","volume":"41","author":"Grin","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05314-6","article-title":"Maternal morbidity following caesarean deliveries with barbed suture for uterine closure","volume":"300","author":"Meyer","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2700","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2700","article-title":"The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration","volume":"339","author":"Liberati","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0014","series-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions","first-page":"205","article-title":"Chapter 8. Assessing risk of bias in included studies","author":"Higgins","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","article-title":"Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range","volume":"14","author":"Wan","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23425","DOI":"10.1038\/srep23425","article-title":"The efficacy and safety of knotless barbed sutures in the surgical field: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"6","author":"Lin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.03.008","article-title":"Role of barbed sutures in repairing uterine wall defects in laparoscopic myomectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis","volume":"23","author":"Zhang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1010","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14080","article-title":"Barbed vs conventional suture at cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"100","author":"Agarwal","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350614554235","article-title":"The role of knotless barbed suture in gynecologic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"22","author":"Iavazzo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0020","first-page":"64","article-title":"Tissue reaction and surgical knots: the effect of suture size, knot configuration, and knot volume","volume":"74","author":"Van Rijssel","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S26","DOI":"10.21037\/atm.2017.08.21","article-title":"Economic evaluation of different suture closure methods: barbed versus traditional interrupted sutures","volume":"5","author":"Elmallah","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0022","first-page":"27","article-title":"Pressure necrosis is the primary cause of wound dehiscence","volume":"28","author":"Bartlett","year":"1985","journal-title":"Can J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0023","series-title":"Wound Closure Biomaterials and Devices","author":"Chu","year":"1997"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001_bib0024","first-page":"82","article-title":"The use of barbed sutures in obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"3","author":"Greenberg","year":"2010","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465022001935?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465022001935?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T09:44:03Z","timestamp":1761558243000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465022001935"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465022001935"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Knotless Barbed versus Conventional Suture for Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 AAGL. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}