{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T04:07:02Z","timestamp":1784261222503,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,1]],"date-time":"2024-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719792000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,1]],"date-time":"2024-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719792000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jmig.org","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,18]],"date-time":"2024-04-18T16:24:10Z","timestamp":1713457450000},"page":"584-591","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["A Retrospective Cohort Study of vNOTES Extraperitoneal Versus Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy With Uterine Preserving Regarding Surgical Outcomes and Two-Year Follow-Up Results"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"31","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2398-9099","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yuya","family":"Dou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Li","family":"Deng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaolong","family":"Liang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Feng","family":"Cao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bingyu","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shuai","family":"Tang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5985-5244","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yanzhou","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","article-title":"Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence","volume":"89","author":"Olsen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004014.pub3","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women","author":"Maher","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","article-title":"Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"209","author":"Korbly","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1159\/000496346","article-title":"Uterus preserving prolapse repair: how long does it last?","volume":"102","author":"Illiano","year":"2019","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","article-title":"Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines","volume":"219","author":"Meriwether","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l5149","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5149","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial","volume":"366","author":"Schulten","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1342-7","article-title":"Five-year outcome of uterus sparing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a single-center experience","volume":"22","author":"Costantini","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0779-4","article-title":"Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature","volume":"20","author":"Dietz","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3959","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm9123959","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis on hysterectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications","volume":"9","author":"Housmans","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.08.616","article-title":"Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for hysterectomy: feasibility report of an innovative approach","volume":"19","author":"Su","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.01.022","article-title":"vNOTES hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: description of technique and perioperative outcomes","volume":"28","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1655","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v17.i13.1655","article-title":"Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress in humans since white paper","volume":"17","author":"Santos","year":"2011","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.10.017","article-title":"Transvaginal single-port laparoscopy sacrocolpopexy","volume":"25","author":"Chen","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.08.009","article-title":"Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study of 26 cases","volume":"26","author":"Liu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"905","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04418-x","article-title":"Transvaginal single-port laparoscopic pelvic reconstruction with Y-shaped mesh: experiences of 93 cases","volume":"32","author":"Li","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0016","first-page":"286","article-title":"Single institutional case series study in extraperitoneal sacral hysteropexy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery","volume":"11","author":"Wang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Chin J laparoscopic Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.09.565","article-title":"Extraperitoneal sacral hysteropexy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a single-center case series study (abstract)","volume":"26","author":"Wang","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0018","unstructured":"U.S. Census Bureau, \u201cU.S. interim projections by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin,\u201d 2005,http:\/\/www.census.gov\/ipc\/www\/usinterimproj"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3222-2","article-title":"Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a video tutorial","volume":"28","author":"Milani","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02396.x","article-title":"Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"117","author":"Price","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1004","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17030","article-title":"Standard practice of presacral exposure during transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for sacrocolpopexy","volume":"129","author":"Lu","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"607.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.008","article-title":"First sacral nerve and anterior longitudinal ligament anatomy: clinical applications during sacrocolpopexy","volume":"217","author":"Florian-Rodriguez","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0023","first-page":"17","article-title":"How to reduce the operative time of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy?","volume":"6","author":"Hoshino","year":"2017"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1591-0","article-title":"Natural orifice vaginal sacrocolpopexy (NOVAS): a cadaver feasibility study","volume":"23","author":"Noblett","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.08.001","article-title":"Mesh exposure and prolapse recurrence following transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for sacrocolpopexy: over 24 months of follow-up data","volume":"29","author":"Lu","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e315","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000917","article-title":"Laparoscopic cerclage sacrohysteropexy: comparing a novel technique for sacrohysteropexy to traditional supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocervicopexy","volume":"27","author":"Armstrong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.11.019","article-title":"Clinical outcomes in women undergoing laparoscopic hysteropexy: a systematic review","volume":"208","author":"Nair","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"849","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2011.11.039","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing rates of abdominal contamination and postoperative infection among natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and open surgery in pigs","volume":"75","author":"Azadani","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.05.015","article-title":"National analysis of perioperative morbidity of vaginal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy at the time of uterosacral ligament suspension","volume":"28","author":"Chapman","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465024001754?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465024001754?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,4]],"date-time":"2024-07-04T10:10:15Z","timestamp":1720087815000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465024001754"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465024001754"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A Retrospective Cohort Study of vNOTES Extraperitoneal Versus Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy With Uterine Preserving Regarding Surgical Outcomes and Two-Year Follow-Up Results","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.013","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 AAGL. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}