{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,5]],"date-time":"2026-07-05T11:08:55Z","timestamp":1783249735822,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jmig.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,10]],"date-time":"2025-04-10T16:52:24Z","timestamp":1744303944000},"page":"775-783","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs Traditional Recovery Pathway After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-2761-9812","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chukwudi Isaac","family":"Ayogu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ayesha","family":"Javed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amanda Freitas","family":"Pompeu dos Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/78.5.606","article-title":"Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation","volume":"78","author":"Kehlet","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200211000-00015","article-title":"From Cuthbertson to fast-track surgery: 70 years of progress in reducing stress in surgical patients","volume":"236","author":"Wilmore Douglas","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(02)00866-8","article-title":"Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome","volume":"183","author":"Kehlet","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002819","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion no. 750 summary: perioperative pathways: enhanced recovery after surgery","volume":"132","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000259","article-title":"Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecology and gynecologic oncology","volume":"70","author":"Barber Emma","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1007\/s12032-018-1153-0","article-title":"Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery","volume":"35","author":"Micha\u0142","year":"2018","journal-title":"Med Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.08.006","article-title":"Enhanced recovery and surgical optimization protocol for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: an AAGL white paper","volume":"28","author":"Stone","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a","article-title":"Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery","volume":"248","author":"Kehlet","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.019","article-title":"Comparison of the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery and traditional recovery pathway in robotic hysterectomy for benign indications: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"31","author":"Bahadur","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0010","first-page":"69","article-title":"A randomized control study on the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol with conventional protocol in total laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"17","author":"Mukka","year":"2024","journal-title":"WJOLS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07475-5","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional postoperative care in patients undergoing hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"310","author":"Jinxia","year":"2024","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2751","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07469-3","article-title":"Intra- and post-operative outcomes of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"309","author":"Erkan","year":"2024","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2021.773653","article-title":"Fast-track in minimally invasive gynecology: a randomized trial comparing costs and clinical outcomes","volume":"8","author":"Lambat Emery","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0014","article-title":"Ultrasound image under artificial intelligence algorithm to evaluate the intervention effect of accelerated rehabilitation surgery nursing on laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"2022","author":"Yu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Comput Intell Neurosci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2535","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2535","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"339","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"d5928","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","article-title":"The Cochrane collaboration\u2019s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"343","author":"Higgins","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i4919","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne Jonathan","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280216669183","article-title":"Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and\/or mid-quartile range","volume":"27","author":"Luo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13382","article-title":"Recovery after enhanced versus conventional care laparoscopic hysterectomy performed in the afternoon: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"151","author":"Kilpi\u00f6","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.4103\/jmas.JMAS_86_21","article-title":"Role of enhanced recovery after surgery in total laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"18","author":"Inania","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Minimal Access Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1186\/s13741-021-00221-4","article-title":"New surgical realities: implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynecological laparoscopy-a prospective study","volume":"10","author":"Jimenez","year":"2021","journal-title":"Perioper Med (Lond)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2022.10.019","article-title":"The impact of enhanced recovery after gynaecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"168","author":"O\u2019Neill Alice","year":"2023","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2020.12.035","article-title":"Outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology \u2013 a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"161","author":"Bisch","year":"2021","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.11.015","article-title":"Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic\/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS\u00ae) society recommendations\u2014part I","volume":"140","author":"Nelson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.12.019","article-title":"Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic\/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS\u00ae) society recommendations\u2014part II","volume":"140","author":"Nelson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000356","article-title":"Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic\/oncology: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations\u20142019 update","volume":"29","author":"Gregg","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1471","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001683","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology: an international survey of peri-operative practice","volume":"30","author":"Prakash","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14386","article-title":"European enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) gynecologic oncology survey: status of ERAS protocol implementation across Europe","volume":"160","author":"G\u00f3mez-Hidalgo Natalia","year":"2023","journal-title":"Intl J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2154","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000002231","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery: current controversies and concerns","volume":"125","author":"Kehlet","year":"2017","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2023.04.009","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS\u00ae) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: addressing implementation challenges\u20142023 update","volume":"173","author":"Nelson","year":"2023","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465025001293?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1553465025001293?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,5]],"date-time":"2025-09-05T21:03:11Z","timestamp":1757106191000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1553465025001293"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S1553465025001293"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["1553-4650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1553-4650","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs Traditional Recovery Pathway After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2025.04.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 AAGL. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}