{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,27]],"date-time":"2026-03-27T11:39:30Z","timestamp":1774611570921,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":77,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,1]],"date-time":"2017-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,1]],"date-time":"2017-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,17]],"date-time":"2017-07-17T23:30:47Z","timestamp":1500334247000},"page":"e164-e174","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["No. 214-Guidelines for the Management of Pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 Weeks"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Martina","family":"Delaney","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Roggensack","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib1","series-title":"International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib2","author":"Mary Hannah"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib3","first-page":"1145","article-title":"Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies","volume":"160","author":"Sue-A-Quan","year":"1999","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(63)90304-1","article-title":"Postmaturity","volume":"85","author":"McClure Browne","year":"1963","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90493-3","article-title":"Active management of prolonged pregnancy","volume":"168","author":"Votta","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)35533-8","article-title":"Fetal effects of prolonged pregnancy","volume":"85","author":"Evans","year":"1963","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib7","first-page":"296","article-title":"Perinatal characteristics of uncomplicated postdates pregnancies","volume":"69","author":"Eden","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib8","first-page":"547","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth","volume":"79","author":"Feldman","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109735","article-title":"Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies","volume":"184","author":"Smith","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10047.x","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality","volume":"105","author":"Hilder","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.319.7205.287","article-title":"Prospective risk of unexplained stillbirth in singleton pregnancies at term: population based analysis","volume":"319","author":"Cotzias","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br Med Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90134-2","article-title":"Assessment of fetal risk in postdate pregnancies","volume":"158","author":"Usher","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.11.1.50.53","article-title":"Post-term pregnancy: should induction of labor be considered before 42 weeks?","volume":"11","author":"Treger","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.446","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978\u20131993","volume":"189","author":"Olesen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib15","first-page":"338","article-title":"Gestational age-dependent reference values for pH in umbilical cord arterial blood at term","volume":"102","author":"Kitlinski","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib16","first-page":"207","article-title":"Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care","volume":"169","author":"Woolf","year":"2003","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1660","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127601","article-title":"Comparison of pregnancy dating by LMP, ultrasound scanning, and their combination","volume":"187","author":"Savitz","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib18","first-page":"676","article-title":"Classical and true gestational postmaturity","volume":"106","author":"Boyce","year":"1970","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(72)90525-X","article-title":"Time of ovulation and prolonged pregnancy","volume":"112","author":"Saito","year":"1976","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12022.x","article-title":"Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy","volume":"104","author":"Gardosi","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870110605","article-title":"Computer-assisted analysis of fetal age in the third trimester using multiple fetal growth parameters","volume":"11","author":"Hadlock","year":"1988","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.14010012.x","article-title":"Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as postterm according to the LMP estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate","volume":"14","author":"Tunon","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(88)90636-8","article-title":"Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"2","author":"Waldenstrom","year":"1988","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(90)91941-3","article-title":"Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial","volume":"336","author":"Saari-Kemppainen","year":"1990","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199309163291201","article-title":"Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome","volume":"329","author":"Ewigman","year":"1993","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3306","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1988.03410220090034","article-title":"The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations","volume":"260","author":"Kramer","year":"1988","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01068.x","article-title":"Algorithms for combining menstrual and ultrasound estimates of gestational age: consequences for rates of preterm and postterm birth","volume":"109","author":"Blondel","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S148","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(01)80278-7","article-title":"A\u00a0decrease in postdates pregnancies in an additional benefit of first trimester screening for aneuploidy","volume":"185","author":"Bukowski","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.065","article-title":"First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm induction rates: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"190","author":"Bennett","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib30","series-title":"Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term","author":"Crowley","year":"1997"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200312000-00023","article-title":"Nuchal translucency-based screening","volume":"46","author":"Welch","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2005.06.006","article-title":"First and second trimester evaluation of risk for fetal aneuploidy: the secondary outcomes of the FASTER Trial","volume":"29","author":"D'Alton","year":"2005","journal-title":"Sem Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib33","first-page":"273","article-title":"Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy","volume":"101","author":"Taipale","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.2.6096.1183","article-title":"Rapid increase in plasma prostaglandin concentrations after vaginal examination and amniotomy","volume":"2","author":"Mitchell","year":"1977","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90134-5","article-title":"Parturitional factors associated with membrane stripping","volume":"169","author":"McColgin","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib36","first-page":"S221","article-title":"Does cervical membrane stripping increase maternal colonization of group B streptococcus?","volume":"187","author":"Netta","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08302.x","article-title":"Sweeping the membranes to prevent post-term pregnancy and to induce labour: a systematic review","volume":"106","author":"Boulvain","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib38","first-page":"CD001328","article-title":"Stripping\/sweeping the membranes for inducing or preventing post-term pregnancy","author":"Boulvain","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib39","first-page":"539","article-title":"Membrane sweeping in conjunction with induction","volume":"96","author":"Foong","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib40","first-page":"71","article-title":"Outpatient management of the uncomplicated postdate pregnancy with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and membrane stripping","volume":"6","author":"Doany","year":"1997","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00015-4","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial of membrane stripping at term to promote labour","volume":"87","author":"Wiriyasirizvaj","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-2115(96)02405-0","article-title":"Stretching of the cervix and stripping of the membranes at term: a randomized controlled study","volume":"66","author":"Goldenberg","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13780.x","article-title":"Sweeping of the membranes is an effective method of induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"99","author":"el-Torkey","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09348.x","article-title":"Sweeping of the membranes at 39 weeks in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"105","author":"Cammu","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00046-4","article-title":"Stripping of membranes as a safe method to reduce prolonged pregnancies","volume":"87","author":"Berghella","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01193.x","article-title":"Sweeping of membranes in formal induction of labour","volume":"109","author":"Wong","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00004-5","article-title":"The effectiveness of sweeping membranes at term: a randomized trial","volume":"89","author":"Crane","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00870.x","article-title":"Membrane sweeping and prevention of post-term pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"113","author":"de Miranda","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1969.tb06180.x","article-title":"A\u00a0controlled trial of surgical induction of labor and amnioscopy in the management of prolonged pregnancy","volume":"76","author":"Henry","year":"1969","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Br Cmwlth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib50","first-page":"58","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: induction or observation","volume":"116","author":"Suikkari","year":"1983","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(83)90175-2","article-title":"Non-aggressive management of post-date pregnancies","volume":"15","author":"Katz","year":"1983","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.293.6554.1059","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: the management debate","volume":"293","author":"Cardozo","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999774","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial of induction at 42 weeks of gestation vs. expectant management for postdates pregnancies","volume":"4","author":"Witter","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1192","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6581.1192","article-title":"Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of in post-term pregnancy","volume":"294","author":"Augensen","year":"1987","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90359-0","article-title":"Management of prolonged pregnancy: Induction of labor versus antepartum testing","volume":"156","author":"Dyson","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib56","first-page":"105","article-title":"Alternative approaches to the management of gravidas with prolonged-postterm- postdate pregnancies","volume":"30","author":"Martin","year":"1989","journal-title":"J\u00a0Miss State Med Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909006139","article-title":"Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy","volume":"68","author":"Bergsjo","year":"1989","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib58","first-page":"231","article-title":"Induction of labor versus conservative management in prolonged pregnancy: controlled study","volume":"4","author":"Heden","year":"1991","journal-title":"Int J Fetomaternal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(92)90325-D","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: the management dilemma","volume":"37","author":"Herabutya","year":"1992","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Willan and the Canadian Multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A\u00a0randomized controlled trial","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70269-1","article-title":"The national institute of child health and human development network of maternal-fetal medicine units. A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy","volume":"170","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)00179-3","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome beyond 41 weeks gestation","volume":"59","author":"Roach","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib63","first-page":"270","article-title":"Management of prolonged pregnancy: A randomized trial of induction and antepartum foetal monitoring","volume":"14","author":"James","year":"2001","journal-title":"Nat J India"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00243-9","article-title":"Postterm with favorable cervix: is induction necessary?","volume":"106","author":"Chanrachakul","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib65","first-page":"101","article-title":"Prolonged Pregnancy: procedure guidelines","volume":"40","author":"Ocon","year":"1997","journal-title":"Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecologia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakravarti S, Goenka B. Conservative policy of induction of labor in uncomplicated postdated pregnancies. XVI FIGO World Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2000 Sept 3\u20138; Washington DC, USA (Book\u00a03). 2000:62.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)80498-1"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores","volume":"120","author":"Gelisen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255665.77009.94","article-title":"Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy","volume":"109","author":"Heimstad","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539500000681","article-title":"Postterm pregnancy: should all women have labour induced? review of the literature","volume":"5","author":"Hannah","year":"1993","journal-title":"Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib70","first-page":"1312","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"101","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib71","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"18","author":"Gulmezoglu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01004.x","article-title":"Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks gestation: nonsensus consensus","volume":"109","author":"Menticoglou","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11402.x","article-title":"A\u00a0randomised controlled trial of simple compared with complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42 weeks of gestation","volume":"102","author":"Alfirevic","year":"1995","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90240-8","article-title":"Postdate fetal surveillance: is 41 weeks too early?","volume":"161","author":"Guidetti","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80005-X","article-title":"The efficacy of starting postterm antenatal testing at 41 weeks as compared with 42 weeks of gestational age","volume":"159","author":"Bochner","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib76","series-title":"Practice Bulletin","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020_bib77","series-title":"Induction of labour. Evidence based clinical Guideline No. 9","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2001"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216317304607?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216317304607?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:30:14Z","timestamp":1761665414000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1701216317304607"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"references-count":77,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S1701216317304607"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1701-2163","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"No. 214-Guidelines for the Management of Pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 Weeks","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}