{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,2]],"date-time":"2026-11-02T21:10:13Z","timestamp":1793653813354,"version":"4.5.1"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]],"date-time":"2020-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1593561600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]],"date-time":"2020-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1593561600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,28]],"date-time":"2020-01-28T08:28:05Z","timestamp":1580200085000},"page":"853-860","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Comparing Foley Catheter to Prostaglandins for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"42","author":[{"given":"Eden","family":"Manly","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liran","family":"Hiersch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandra","family":"Moloney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Berndl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elad","family":"Mei-Dan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arthur","family":"Zaltz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jon","family":"Barrett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2704-1385","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nir","family":"Melamed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0001","first-page":"1","article-title":"Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age","volume":"155","author":"Osterman","year":"2014","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0002","first-page":"386","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","article-title":"Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Vaknin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13456","article-title":"A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour","volume":"123","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e13251","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000013251","article-title":"Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"97","author":"Zhu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0007","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0008","article-title":"Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term","author":"Thomas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-2115(96)02440-2","article-title":"Cervical collagen in non-pregnant women with previous cervical incompetence","volume":"67","author":"Petersen","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-8-82","article-title":"Collagen concentration and biomechanical properties of samples from the lower uterine cervix in relation to age and parity in non-pregnant women","volume":"8","author":"Oxlund","year":"2010","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.26719\/2004.10.4-5.547","article-title":"Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas","volume":"10","author":"Al-Taani","year":"2004","journal-title":"East Mediterr Health J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1011101","article-title":"Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone","volume":"35","author":"Lokkegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70149-3","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"180","author":"Sciscione","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2095","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-25","article-title":"Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial","volume":"13","author":"Henry","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017","article-title":"Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature","volume":"170","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1280","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000238","article-title":"Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Edwards","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2382","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1086331","article-title":"Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Wang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12577","article-title":"Induction of labour using balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel","volume":"57","author":"Brown","year":"2017","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2777","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1355906","article-title":"Foley catheter versus intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"31","author":"Barda","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2017.122","article-title":"Time-to-delivery and delivery outcomes comparing three methods of labor induction in 7551 nulliparous women: a population-based cohort study","volume":"37","author":"Wollmann","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E35","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.108.2.e35","article-title":"A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age","volume":"108","author":"Kramer","year":"2001","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00392-2","article-title":"Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"81","author":"Niromanesh","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90594-4","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter","volume":"172","author":"St Onge","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340500523685","article-title":"Randomized study on removable PGE2 vaginal insert versus PGE2 cervical gel for cervical priming and labor induction in low-Bishop-score pregnancy","volume":"85","author":"Strobelt","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70153-4","article-title":"Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil","volume":"177","author":"Chyu","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00069-6","article-title":"Prepidil compared to Propess for cervical ripening","volume":"104","author":"Vollebregt","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1175","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70127-9","article-title":"Effectiveness of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel (Prepidil), with immediate oxytocin, versus vaginal insert (Cervidil) for induction of labor","volume":"179","author":"Stewart","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.08.009","article-title":"Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized trial","volume":"138","author":"Marconi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70363-1","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel and a slow release vaginal pessary for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"179","author":"Ottinger","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.14.3.158.162","article-title":"Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary","volume":"14","author":"D'Aniello","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.06.039","article-title":"Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial","volume":"119","author":"Facchinetti","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610220130607","article-title":"Is Propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women","volume":"22","author":"Mukhopadhyay","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0034","first-page":"847","article-title":"Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis","volume":"97","author":"Hughes","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1159\/000491784","article-title":"Labor induction in late-onset fetal growth restriction: foley balloon versus vaginal dinoprostone","volume":"46","author":"Villalain","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S170121631930982X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S170121631930982X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:36:39Z","timestamp":1761665799000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S170121631930982X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S170121631930982X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1701-2163","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparing Foley Catheter to Prostaglandins for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}