{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]],"date-time":"2026-02-16T18:36:44Z","timestamp":1771267004236,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596240000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596240000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,6]],"date-time":"2020-05-06T19:07:51Z","timestamp":1588792071000},"page":"953-956","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Is Hysteroscopy the Best Surgical Approach for Removal of Retained Products of Conception Following Surgical Termination of Pregnancy?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4561-7659","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Noam","family":"Smorgick","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sergei","family":"Kostin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tamar","family":"Tzur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Orna","family":"Levinsohn-Tavor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ron","family":"Maymon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zvi","family":"Vaknin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2008.27.3.357","article-title":"Occurrence and outcome of residual trophoblastic tissue: a prospective study","volume":"27","author":"Van den Bosch","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096","article-title":"Asherman syndrome\u2014one century later","volume":"89","author":"Yu","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3347","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.12.3347","article-title":"Prevalence of Asherman's syndrome after secondary removal of placental remnants or a repeat curettage for incomplete abortion","volume":"13","author":"Westendorp","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.11.020","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: meta-analysis and literature review","volume":"173","author":"Smorgick","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.11.016","article-title":"Intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic treatment for retained products of conception: what are the risk factors?","volume":"103","author":"Barel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.09.021","article-title":"Long-term complications and reproductive outcome after the management of retained products of conception: a systematic review","volume":"105","author":"Hooker","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.02.113","article-title":"Prevalence of intrauterine adhesions after the application of hyaluronic acid gel after dilatation and curettage in women with at least one previous curettage: short-term outcomes of a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial","volume":"107","author":"Hooker","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1159\/000010305","article-title":"A clinicohysteroscopic scoring system of intrauterine adhesions","volume":"50","author":"Nasr","year":"2000","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.08.003","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue is superior to ultrasound-guided curettage","volume":"18","author":"Rein","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1159\/000486674","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid gel for the prevention of intrauterine adhesion: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","volume":"83","author":"Liu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.05.001","article-title":"Intrauterine adhesion prevention after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"215","author":"Healy","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216320300992?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216320300992?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:36:35Z","timestamp":1761665795000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1701216320300992"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S1701216320300992"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1701-2163","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Is Hysteroscopy the Best Surgical Approach for Removal of Retained Products of Conception Following Surgical Termination of Pregnancy?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.01.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}