{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:46:05Z","timestamp":1761666365739,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598918400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598918400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,22]],"date-time":"2020-04-22T17:38:48Z","timestamp":1587577128000},"page":"1154-1157","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Bioethics of Translating Limited Evidence into Clinical Practice: Case Study of the Cerebroplacental Ratio"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0099-0089","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Naila","family":"Ramji","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6827-8063","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Klitzman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1258\/jrsm.2011.110180","article-title":"The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research","volume":"104","author":"Morris","year":"2011","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","article-title":"The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses","volume":"213","author":"DeVore","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0003","first-page":"249","article-title":"Fetal cerebro-placental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and diagnostic performance","volume":"44","author":"Nassr","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-017-0928-z","article-title":"Reduced growth velocity across the third trimester is associated with placental insufficiency in fetuses born at a normal birthweight: a prospective cohort study","volume":"15","author":"MacDonald","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18830","article-title":"Cerebroplacental ratio in reduced fetal movements: evidence of worsening fetal hypoxemia","volume":"51","author":"Binder","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15729","article-title":"Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss","volume":"47","author":"Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","article-title":"Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2017.02.006","article-title":"Review: systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"54","author":"Dunn","year":"2017","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024","article-title":"Discordance in fetal biometry and Doppler are independent predictors of the risk of perinatal loss in twin pregnancies","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.6.371.375","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and neonatal outcome in diamnionic monochorionic and dichorionic twins","volume":"10","author":"Gaziano","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0012","first-page":"110","article-title":"Association between the cerebroplacental ratio and fetal growth disorders in monochorionic twins. Short oral presentation, presented at: 28th World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. October 20\u201324, 2018; Singapore","volume":"52","author":"Ramji","year":"2018","journal-title":"Abstract available: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000490","article-title":"Clinical significance of cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"30","author":"Kalafat","year":"2018","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14782","article-title":"Author's reply re: should we implement universal screening with late pregnancy ultrasound to prevent stillbirth?","volume":"125","author":"Smith","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.003","article-title":"Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"218","author":"Figueras","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002","article-title":"Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"221","author":"Akolekar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17371","article-title":"The magnitude of change in the fetal cerebroplacental ratio in the third trimester and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome","volume":"50","author":"Flatley","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216320302218?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216320302218?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:37:54Z","timestamp":1761665874000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1701216320302218"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S1701216320302218"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1701-2163"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Bioethics of Translating Limited Evidence into Clinical Practice: Case Study of the Cerebroplacental Ratio","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.117","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}