{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,7]],"date-time":"2026-11-07T02:32:38Z","timestamp":1794018758898,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":66,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,1]],"date-time":"2021-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617235200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,1]],"date-time":"2021-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617235200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009491","name":"St Mark's Hospital Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009491","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,5]],"date-time":"2021-02-05T11:50:55Z","timestamp":1612525855000},"page":"511-523.e1","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":63,"title":["Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Roxana","family":"Geoffrion","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maryse","family":"Larouche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","article-title":"Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"24","author":"Barber","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i3853","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i3853","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"354","author":"Barber","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000286","article-title":"Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery","volume":"123","author":"Wu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73729","article-title":"Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"116","author":"Smith","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","article-title":"Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence","volume":"89","author":"Olsen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00829-9","article-title":"Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence","volume":"189","author":"Clark","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e234","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-201711000-00052","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 185: Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"130","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.4274\/tjod.93546","article-title":"Should we add unilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation to vaginal hysterectomy in management of stage 3 and stage 4 pelvic organ prolapse?","volume":"12","author":"A\u011fa\u00e7ayak","year":"2015","journal-title":"Turk J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.010","article-title":"Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate","volume":"217","author":"Ross","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000389","article-title":"Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse","volume":"23","author":"Anand","year":"2017","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12097","article-title":"Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse","volume":"137","author":"Chen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.09.015","article-title":"Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage","volume":"218","author":"Lavelle","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.031","article-title":"Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study","volume":"190","author":"Maher","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701332811","article-title":"Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse","volume":"86","author":"Marcickiewicz","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2216-6","article-title":"Iliococcygeus fixation or abdominal sacral colpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"25","author":"Milani","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0016","first-page":"475","article-title":"Comparison of effectiveness of vaginal and abdominal routes in treating severe uterovaginal or vault prolapse","volume":"45","author":"Ng","year":"2004","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1082","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.9027","article-title":"Laparoscopic reconstructive surgery is superior to vaginal reconstruction in the pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"11","author":"Park","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2666-0","article-title":"High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up","volume":"26","author":"Rondini","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00001.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function","volume":"111","author":"Roovers","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1369","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001717","article-title":"Readmission and Prolapse Recurrence After Abdominal and Vaginal Apical Suspensions in Older Women","volume":"128","author":"Sanses","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000704","article-title":"Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"25","author":"Smith","year":"2019","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318166d70a","article-title":"Vaginal prolapse surgery: comparing abdominal sacral colpopexy to uterosacral suspension","volume":"14","author":"Thompson","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Pelvic Med Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000345","article-title":"Perioperative Complications and Cost of Vaginal, Open Abdominal, and Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Vault Prolapse","volume":"23","author":"Anand","year":"2017","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.2017.0045","article-title":"Apical Prolapse Surgical Treatment Outcomes: Transabdominal Versus Transvaginal Approach","volume":"34","author":"Eftekhar","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3405-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse using validated questionnaires: 2-year prospective study","volume":"29","author":"Lone","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1687","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2761-2","article-title":"Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study","volume":"26","author":"Rahmanou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1384-5","article-title":"Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review","volume":"22","author":"Abed","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1085","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.05.006","article-title":"No. 351-Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"39","author":"Larouche","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","article-title":"Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"309","author":"Nygaard","year":"2013","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000006","article-title":"Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Anger","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1469","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3296-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"28","author":"Coolen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.12.089","article-title":"Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial","volume":"196","author":"Costantini","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1885-x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study","volume":"24","author":"Freeman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.11.025","article-title":"Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes","volume":"79","author":"Geller","year":"2012","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2019.07.043","article-title":"Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study","volume":"134","author":"Illiano","year":"2019","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000300","article-title":"One-Year Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy","volume":"22","author":"Kenton","year":"2016","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0768-7","article-title":"A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences","volume":"20","author":"Klauschie","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000036","article-title":"Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Nosti","year":"2014","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2869-4","article-title":"Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"27","author":"Paek","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c","article-title":"Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Paraiso","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-011-0748-2","article-title":"Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy","volume":"30","author":"Seror","year":"2012","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435 e1-5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.035","article-title":"Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy","volume":"206","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3181fa44cf","article-title":"Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes","volume":"17","author":"Tan-Kim","year":"2011","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7","article-title":"One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study","volume":"21","author":"Dietz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","article-title":"Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial","volume":"311","author":"Barber","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.004","article-title":"Pain and activity after vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence","volume":"221","author":"Barber","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h3717","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h3717","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"351","author":"Detollenaere","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1887","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03950-9","article-title":"Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques","volume":"30","author":"Husby","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.2827","article-title":"Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial","volume":"319","author":"Jelovsek","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l5149","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5149","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial","volume":"366","author":"Schulten","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2005.04.022","article-title":"Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse","volume":"48","author":"Costantini","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3182673772","article-title":"Abdominal sacral hysteropexy: a pilot study comparing sacral hysteropexy to sacral colpopexy with hysterectomy","volume":"18","author":"Cvach","year":"2012","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.02.012","article-title":"Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction","volume":"27","author":"Haj-Yahya","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.75","article-title":"Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept","volume":"188","author":"Hefni","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.006","article-title":"Effects of uterine preservation on long-term subjective outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"240","author":"Ng","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2775-9","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"27","author":"Pan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1635-5","article-title":"Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ?","volume":"23","author":"Romanzi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0059","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-006-0240-5","article-title":"Quality of life after surgery for genital prolapse in elderly women: obliterative and reconstructive surgery","volume":"18","author":"Barber","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0060","first-page":"273","article-title":"Uterosacral colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of laparoscopic and vaginal approaches","volume":"54","author":"Rardin","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000306","article-title":"Subjective and Objective Outcomes of Robotic and Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension","volume":"22","author":"Vallabh-Patel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.2017.60.2.207","article-title":"Comparison of sexual function between sacrocolpopexy and sacrocervicopexy","volume":"60","author":"Ko","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.09.023","article-title":"McCall Culdoplasty vs. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation after vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function in postmenopausal women","volume":"194","author":"Kokanal\u0131","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0064","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1481","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-2041-3","article-title":"Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair: role of hysterectomy","volume":"24","author":"Costantini","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Larouche M, Belzile E, Geoffrion R. Surgical Management of Symptomatic Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2021;137(6). In press.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004393"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001_bib0066","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000570","article-title":"Mesh Sacrocolpopexy Compared With Native Tissue Vaginal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","volume":"125","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216321000670?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216321000670?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:38:53Z","timestamp":1761665933000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1701216321000670"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"references-count":66,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S1701216321000670"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1701-2163","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}